Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B6, HP, AA, UA, CO, DL In NYC-CA Game  
User currently offlineJetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3018 posts, RR: 14
Posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5063 times:

In the past week, I read 2 articles stating that the transcon markets are becoming more and more competitive. And with the competition comes lower loads, less money, and more angry airlines. Here are the articles:

http://www.btnmag.com/businesstravelnews/headlines/othernews_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000461643

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/2004-03-15-transcon_x.htm

From the articles, I learned 2 very important things about the trancon market from NYC-CA:

- ATA is stopping EWR-SFO
- HP is losing money on JFK-SFO

My questions are: what do you think will happen? What airline will be the next to drop routes/frequencies? What are the airlines' next moves?

Any input, helpful information, and opinions are very much welcomed.

JetBluefan1


Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2692 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5027 times:

Well, I can tell you right now that my flights from EWR-LAX on CO on 762s were oversold in both directions on Dec. 27 - Jan. 3. The gate agents at LAX were really frustrated because, according to them, "all our flights to EWR are oversold, almost everyday."

Apparently, although the yields might not be great, CO is filling their planes. I'm sure that the other majors are doing fine as well - it seems as if the LCCs are really having the difficulty. Maybe people are heading to the established airlines on a flight of that length for things like widebody service and real meals.


User currently offlineAA787 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 611 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4925 times:

Who would like to venture a guess as to the airline that does the best on these routes?

Just curious,
AA787



ET In NYC
User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4889 times:

I'd say UA does the best out of SFO, and AA does the best out of LAX. SFO has the premium market in the SF Bay Area by the balls, and both AA and UA have the lucrative S.A.G. contracts out of LAX.

User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4886 times:

make that UA has the premium market in the SF Bay Area by the balls.

User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 4853 times:

Cory,

ATA's flights were packed around the prime holiday travel dates you mention (Dec. 27 - Jan. 3). The problem is the flights left with only between 30 and 60 customers the majority of the year. Without a hub at either end to make connections, it was a tough route once the competition heated up and capacity increased (keeping all fares low) -- even though the red-eye only had to cover direct variable costs since the aircraft sits idle overnight at SFO if not flying the red-eye. I have the impression that a lot of important lessons were learned. I'd look for another attempt to be made with a different destination for the reason cited above -- the aircraft overnights at SFO between Hawaii turns if not flying. This makes it fairly inexpensive to experiment with new red-eye routes.

joe


User currently offlineWmupilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4725 times:

I think it was a smart move to pull out. We can better utilize the aircraft elsewhere. Let everybody else slug it out and lose money. We were smart and stupid to try and take everybody but we where even smarter to get out before we really got hurt.


JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently offlineFutureatp From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 222 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4624 times:

As far as HP goes

I work for HP in PHX. Last month I overheard some of our pilots joking about the load on the SFO-JFK route just being about 10 pax or so. But last week I heard(from conversations overheard from pilots) that the particular route is now picking up. Sorry I cannot provide more exact details about the load factors. Dont even know if that route is at a profitible level yet for HP.

John



User currently offlineJetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3018 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4520 times:

I think it was a smart move to pull out. We can better utilize the aircraft elsewhere. Let everybody else slug it out and lose money. We were smart and stupid to try and take everybody but we where even smarter to get out before we really got hurt.

I do agree that a non-profitable route should be pulled - no arguing there. But I really don't think that "everybody else" is losing money. The thing is that ATA is not established in NYC or SFO. There were absolutely no connection opportunities - just O&D. In NYC, B6, DL, AA, UA, and CO all have very loyal followings in NYC, and in SFO, UA, HP, and to a lesser degree, B6.

Now let's say - for example - if ATA flew SFO-LAX, SFO-PHX, LGA-FLL, LGA-CO / KMCO), USA - Florida">MCO, then they'd be more well known in those cities, therefore helping them gain customers more easily on their EWR-SFO flights.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineWmupilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4466 times:

The thing is that ATA is not established in NYC or SFO

ATA is well established in SFO. We have great publiciy in that city and the loads out of SFO are great. I agree that there where no connection oppurtunities on the transcon flights so why would people take them. The only place you could go was EWR-HNL with a stop in SFO.



JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently offlineYanksn4 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1404 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4442 times:

With Frontier Airlines having a "mini" hub in Los Angeles, are they one day going to start a LAX-LGA flight? Would they be that crazy to do that?



2013 Airports: EWR, JFK, LGA, LIS, AGP, DEN, GIG, RGN, BKK, LHR, FRA, LAX, SYD, PER, MEL, MCO, MIA, PEK, IAH
User currently offlineJetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3018 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4398 times:

With Frontier Airlines having a "mini" hub in Los Angeles, are they one day going to start a LAX-LGA flight? Would they be that crazy to do that?

Only on a Saturday, the only day that the perimeter "law" isn't followed.

Also, if F9 were to start LAX-NYC, I don't think they'd be too happy. With 6 airlines already serving the route, I just don't see F9 entering an already congested market. And if they were to start LAX-NYC, it'd have to be though JFK (which already has B6, UA, AA, HP, DL), or EWR (CO, AA?, UA?).

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA/UA/CO New Uniforms posted Mon Jul 24 2006 22:05:30 by Tsaord
RUMOUR: UA/CO Merger In The Works? posted Thu Jun 29 2006 15:49:15 by Dc10s4ever
UA,CO, DL, US Flights From AMS Full? posted Tue Mar 1 2005 17:24:32 by Junior1970
US/DL/UA/CO/AA/NW Merger posted Thu Nov 16 2006 22:25:36 by JBo
AA/UA/US/CO/DL At LHR posted Fri May 20 2005 21:33:23 by Junior1970
AA,UA,DL,NW,CO,US. Choose Your Pick. posted Mon Oct 13 2003 22:06:13 by GoAibusGo
AA, DL, UA, CO And NW's Future Fleets posted Wed Jun 20 2001 20:53:13 by Boeing747-400
AA, UA, DL Raise Fares posted Sat Oct 28 2006 06:26:44 by SkyvanMan
Logic Of CO And DL In Same Alliance? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 19:29:58 by PanAm747
Financial Update: AA&CO Shares Soar, DL Needs Time posted Fri Oct 20 2006 23:31:06 by Dutchjet