Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Was FRA Chosen As LH Hub?  
User currently offlinePzurita1 From Greenland, joined Sep 2002, 1393 posts, RR: 14
Posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4254 times:

May be the answer might be very obvios to some of you guys, but I would still like to start this thread.

Why was Frankfurt considered to be the hub and main base of LH? At that time being, FRA was not the largest city, was not the capital city, was not the most industrial area, and was not that centrally located... instead, was a medium size city.

Any info will be greatly appreciated to solve my curiosity.

PZ


Next flight: IAH-DBX-MRU-ANT
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4206 times:

Yes, not the most central in Germany, but in Europe you don't get much more centrally located except for the possible exception of maybe Zurich. Also, Frankfurt has for a long time been the financial capital of Germany.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineEI A330-200 From Sweden, joined Apr 2001, 409 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4155 times:

I hate to be one of those people who tell you to do a search, but this question came up like last week. I believe it was chosen because at the time LH was choosing a hub, FRA was located in West Germany, it was centrally located, it was easily accessable, and it was the financial and business areas of Germany.


Long live Aer Lingus, the Flying Shamrock!
User currently offlinePanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2692 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4109 times:

FRA is the financial center of Germany- much like NYC is the financial center for the USA- the world, too, actually. Nevertheless, FRA had a great somewhat-centralized location, and an airport large enough to handle the # of flights LH wanted out of their hub. Also, a great place to connect when going from the USA to Asia, if you go the "long way".

User currently offlineKEno From Malaysia, joined Feb 2004, 1842 posts, RR: 27
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4025 times:

I wonder why Berlin wasn't developed to match FRA & MUC. It's the nation's capital and often claims the title "the centre/capital of Europe" since the unification. Why not give the former East Germany a piece of the action now?

User currently offlinePanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2692 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3993 times:

Did LH have trans-atlantic non-stops from Berlin at any time? How about the smaller German cities, like HAM or others. Have they ever had Trans-Atlantic service? I know that DUS has LTU and used to have CO and UA. Any other cities other than MUC or FRA?

User currently offlineSW733 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6365 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3974 times:

LH had an IAD - TXL nonstop a few years back, right? Didn't last long if I remember. What a shame, Berlin is a GREAT city

User currently offlinePHX Flyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 585 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3905 times:

That's an easy question to answer: It was the first major airport in West Germany that was opened to civilian air traffic after WWII.
Else Lufthansa might have stayed in Cologne, where LH 1 had one of their major hubs before the war, and where LH 2 was incorporated. As a matter of fact, their corproate headquarters is still in Cologne. However, that city did not have a functional civilian airport until 1957. By that time, FRA was already established as the primary gateway of West Germany.


User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3901 times:

KEno,

Berlin Airports are being coslidated. A brand new airport is being built and it will provide formidable competition to both MUC and FRA.

FRA can not grow very much anymore because of noise concerns. This is why LH has been puching more and more flights out of MUC.



User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3840 times:

Re: Berlin...

Wasn't really able to be developed for the longest time, due to the division and the fact it was surrounded by East Germany (GDR/DDR). Even after reunification 14 years ago, it was an "island' surrounded by a virtually nonexistent economy, and therefore there was no demand initially to put together a huge international gateway.

The German economy is in a recession, and while some improvements have been made to infrastructure in the former East, the economic center is still largely in the western area of the country. The German government has been spending $70 billion annually to rebuild the east, and now that the capital is back in Berlin, I still think it will take several more years before it becomes the true center of Germany again.

According to A-net user Leskova, TXL and Tempelhof are closed or will be closed within a matter of years, and the modern airport will be at what is now Schoenefeld Flughafen (SXF) south of the city, in what was formerly East Berlin. New runways and terminals are being constructed, and I think it's set to open in 2006 or 2007. BBI is the name of the project...Berlin/Brandenburg Flughafen, though SXF I think will stay as the IATA code for it. My feeling is that LH will keep their hub at FRA, but will still be the largest carrier by far at MUC and the new Berlin airport.

Hope that helps. Berlin is an AMAZING city..I love it there...last time was May '93 and I'm going back this July, I can hardly wait.


User currently offlinePHX Flyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 585 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3830 times:

<< Any other cities other than MUC or FRA? >>

From 1960 until the early 80s LH had a daily flight CGN-JFK, and in the early 90s they operated CGN-EWR an CGN-IAD


User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3805 times:

Berlin.. being the largest city in all of Eastern Europe (I believe close to 5 million) and the capital of the most powerful economy in Europe... will eventually (once the new airport has been developed) develop into a large hub. No question about that. Whether it will be LH.. I don't think so. But there will definitely be some NEW airline that will recognize the potential some day.

Just my two cents...


User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3658 times:

LH was not permitted to operate flights to Berlin until 1990. Today, Berlin is an economically struggling region (20% unemployment) and yields are VERY low. (TXL-IAD was not able to make any profit, despite VERY high load factors).

Two words about BBI: It's a pretty important project for the entire eastern Gemany region, but I don't see it coming before 2012 or later. Official plannings are now counting on winter 2010 for entry into service, but then again, MUC was planned to open 1972, and it opened in 92.

Also, in the 1940s, FRA was in the race of becoming Germany's capital, but that way before a hub system was developed.

Now LH operates the "meshed hub" FRA/MUC, which begin to act more and more like a single large hub; as opposed to other airlines that operate two or more hubs, the FRA and MUC schedules are highly coordinated to one another.

I don't see Berlin becoming any kind of LH hub, at least not before 2015 or 2020; but it is possible that Air Berlin develops Berlin as a hub in not too distant future; we'll see

SailorOrion


User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1107 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

Besides FRA and MUC, DL has a daily flight from STR to ATL. LH (with Privatair) has a Business Jet service to ORD six times a week. DL also used to fly STR-NYC but this one was axed as well as their service out of HAM.

Like SailorOrion said, the economy in and around Berlin is very weak. It is the center of Germany in many ways but for sure not it's commercial center. And that won't change within the next decade. Easy Jet will open a base there and that might work out. But LH and other carriers which look for business pax, will not use Berlin as a hub, even with the opening of BBI, which is years away.

I agree with what was said above. Berlin is a great city. But you won't fly there nonstop from another continent any time soon.


User currently offline747SPA330MD11 From Germany, joined Dec 2003, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3457 times:

******
PanAm330:

Did LH have trans-atlantic non-stops from Berlin at any time? How about the smaller German cities, like HAM or others. Have they ever had Trans-Atlantic service?

********

In 1991 or 1992 I flew with PanAm on Airbus 310 Non Stop EWR-HAM
For me this was an excellent connection, because I hate Frankfurt Airport. Now for my flights to Asia I use to go via Amsterdam and fly KLM.

Best regards,
Jan



Save the 747 SP !!
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17118 posts, RR: 66
Reply 15, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3446 times:

KEno said:
I wonder why Berlin wasn't developed to match FRA & MUC. It's the nation's capital and often claims the title "the centre/capital of Europe" since the unification. Why not give the former East Germany a piece of the action now?


It's only been a little over a decade. Give them time.


PanAm330 said:
FRA is the financial center of Germany- much like NYC is the financial center for the USA- the world, too, actually.

`
Was that last bit really necessary?






"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineMozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2204 posts, RR: 13
Reply 16, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3413 times:

A couple of additions here:

FRA was not the largest city, was not the capital city, was not the most industrial area, and was not that centrally located

Frankfurt was almost the capital of Germany after WWII. When West Germany had to pick a capital, FRA was the top contender because of its economic and financial importance and also for historic reasons (Paul Church meeting in the 19th century, a sort of first pan-German assembly). Moreover, it is quite centrally located for Western Germany. The most "central point" would be somewhere between Kassel and Siegen, i.e. in perfect no man's land. FRA was a good choice.

Did LH have trans-atlantic non-stops from Berlin at any time? How about the smaller German cities, like HAM or others. Have they ever had Trans-Atlantic service? I know that DL), Germany">DUS has LTU and used to have CO and UA. Any other cities other than MUC or FRA?

I think the Berlin question was answered above. Just want to add that the TXL-IAD service was introduced in spring 2001 and axed after 9/11. Juergen Weber, Lufthansa CEO at the time, pleaded with the local Berlin businesses to make use of that flight (daily A 340) as this would be a test for LH of Berlin's attractivneness for longhaul travel. Bear in mind that air traffic wise Berlin is a bad joke: LH flies mainline jets only to domestic destinations, the few international destinations that are served only see CRJs and the like. Other airlines do have some presence, but notable intercont players like DL (which did JFK-Berlin TXL) and SQ (which did SIN-VIE-Berlin SXF) pulled out. The European players are there, but compared to what you get to see in say Munich or even DL), Germany">DUS, Berlin is backwaters. The reasons for Berlin's lack of attractiveness are very well explained by StevenUhl777.

Other German airports: there is a long history of LH intercont flights from cities other than FRA in the 80s and 90s (before that I don't know):

HAM: used to see a 747 twice a week that went FRA-HAM-ANC-NRT-OSA, up until the mid 80s I think. Later on, an A310 did TXL-HAM-EWR for a very short period of time. LAter on, there was a HAM-DL), Germany">DUS-JFK service, in the end it was a 737 going from HAM to DL), Germany">DUS connecting to a 310 to JFK.

DL), Germany">DUS: THe DC10, later 310 service to JFK with feeders from HAM and for some time also from MUC, later turned into an A340 to EWR. That was axed after 9/11. Today, LH uses Business Class-only BBJ and A319LR to EWR and ORD. Also, in the past there were DC10s going FRA-DL), Germany">DUS-MIA and FRA-DL), Germany">DUS-YYZ

CGN: Cologne has an interesting history. There was an effort by LH around 1989 to establish CGN as a hub. Alongside a number of European flights they also introduced A310 flights to IAD and EWR - at the time those were the first LH flights to these destinations.

MUC: MUC used to have its DC10s to JFK and to ORD during the 80s (I still remember a DC10 at the old Riem airport), later on there was an A310 doing MUC-DL), Germany">DUS-JFK, which later turned into a nonstop service. Today, LH serves 18 intercontinental destinations from MUC (YUL, YVR from this spring on, BOS, JFK, EWR, CLT from this spring on, MIA, ORD, SFO, LAX, JNB, DXB, TEH, DEL from this spring on, NRT, PEK from this spring on, PVG-CAN as one flight), plus a number of Star Alliance partner flights: UA to IAD, AC to YYZ, TG to BKK. In the past, there had been LH flights to BKK, SIN and KIX.

What is interesting to see is that there are some destinations that are only served out of MUC and no longer from FRA, such as CAN or CLT or at the time KIX. In terms of number of European and domestic flights, LH says that MUC is as big as FRA today.


User currently offlineHz747300 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 1704 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3381 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If you go to the Frankfurt and grab the walking tour brochure from the Sofitel, you will read that Frankfurt was the commerce capital of the Germanic area since it was granted free trade rights by the emperor in and around 1100AD.

In Frankfurt now, it is really easy to see why. The city itself may not be large, but the amount of business there would justify it now certainly.



Keep on truckin'...
User currently offlineStefandotde From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3364 times:

First of all: Berlin isn't in Eastern Europe.
Also there is lots of industry and lots of companies in and around FRA. BER has Berlin, nothing much in the surroundings.
Also FRA has excellent surface transportation possibilities - direct trains to Frankfurt Airport (trains are very important for Germany, so airlines have very cheap feeder services to FRA, not to BER).
That's the point.


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17118 posts, RR: 66
Reply 19, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3354 times:

If nothing else, the stock exchange is there. Although London is more important, Frankfurt is by far the most important financial center of continental Europe.

Mozart: Great history lesson, thx! I believe the reason that Frankfurt was not chosen is because Bonn could more easily be seen as a temporary solution until reunification (yes they already thought about it waaaay back).

However, it would seem that money snubs it's nose at politics, as usual.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineMozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2204 posts, RR: 13
Reply 20, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3312 times:

Starlionblue,

one of the other deciding factors for the choice of Bonn instead of FRA was that a certain Konrad Adenauer (Chancellor of West Germany for more than a decade after WWII) was from there.

Also FRA has excellent surface transportation possibilities - direct trains to Frankfurt Airport (trains are very important for Germany, so airlines have very cheap feeder services to FRA, not to BER).

True, but that did not matter when FRA was picked as LH's hub. LH started developing FRA a long time before FRA and FRA Airport had great railway connections. It is true that historically FRA was well connected to the rest of Germany, but historically COlogne had actually been much better connected. Moreover, the German railway system developed step-wise after the war as most of it had been destroyed, so there was no way the LH folks after the war could judge the actual situation of the railway system in the 1970s or 1980s.


User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3289 times:

Arguments for FRA:

- economic capital (!!)
- opened after WW II (Berlin Bridge)
- in the center of Germany
- almost became capital of Germany after WW II

Berlin.. being the largest city in all of Eastern Europe (I believe close to 5 million) and the capital of the most powerful economy in Europe... will eventually (once the new airport has been developed) develop into a large hub. No question about that.

Berlin indeed is a great city... but it was sourrounded by East Germany, as stated before. So, having the German hub there made no sense... and getting traffic rights for BER was not possible for everyone, like LH, as said

There is the ambitious project in developing Schoenefeld SFX to a huge a/p. But in my eyes, this strategy will fail. I lived 3 years in BER, and it is absolutely in the middle of nowhere (surrounded by thousands of village) and has no economic structure and opportunities. It is a great city, but tourism isn't enough. Then, FRA and and MUC have much better structures and oportunities, economy... in the case of FRA, the Rhein-Main Area is very strong. Making another hub in Berlin makes no sense


User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4857 posts, RR: 20
Reply 22, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

Another reason that Bonn was chosen over Frankfurt in 1949 is that the back-then chief of the CDU and first chancellor of Germany Konrad Adenauer was in favour of it as it was close to his own home town.

Germany is, unlike many other European countries (France, the UK), a polycentric country, where the cultural, financial and political centres are not in the same city. Therefore, a decision for the one, main hub wasn't as easy as it was with Paris or London.


User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3225 times:

Generally great text, Racko...

Germany is, unlike many other European countries (France, the UK), a
polycentric country, where the cultural, financial and political centres are not in the same city. Therefore, a decision for the one, main hub wasn't as easy as it was with Paris or London.


and it was probably the federal structure which made Germany so successfulpost WW II. Since the economic capital - unlike others, as you say - was chosen to be in FRA, no wonder FRA has become the hub.
The Adenauer interpretation is correct, too... and although Bonn became capital, Cologne is too far from the center to become a big airport. It was clever to decentralize capital, economy...


User currently offlinePzurita1 From Greenland, joined Sep 2002, 1393 posts, RR: 14
Reply 24, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3085 times:

Thank you all for your great input, summarized by Mrniji.

PZ



Next flight: IAH-DBX-MRU-ANT
25 Post contains images PHX Flyer : Sorry, in light of all this misinformation that has accumulated here, I can't help posting some annotations to put some things straight (My apologies
26 Post contains images Mrniji : Dear PHX Flyer, I strongly appreciate your comments, because you show that you comprehensively attempt to answer the questions. Many things you say ar
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Was LH Flight From FRA To BHX Diverted To MAN? posted Sat Nov 26 2005 18:28:37 by Aeronick
Why Doesn't LAX Work As A Hub? posted Wed Oct 17 2001 16:00:21 by Lindy field
Why Was The 737 Original Built? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 20:28:05 by 747400sp
Why Was BA So Short Lived In SJO? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 06:14:26 by Tomascubero
How Is YYZ As A Cargo Hub? posted Sat Oct 21 2006 17:53:30 by RicardoFG
FRA-PEK On LH! posted Sat Oct 7 2006 20:33:39 by Thepilot730
AMS-FRA-JNB With LH J/cl - Awful posted Thu Sep 28 2006 14:47:00 by QM001
Why Was Concorde Not Allowed In The US? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 03:59:28 by Remcor
Why Was There A PIA A310 In Boston (BOS) Today? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 04:59:40 by Reggaebird
Why Was Jetblue Flight 352 Diverted On Aug 18th? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 01:46:17 by Treebeard787