Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Emirates Chooses SFO Over LAX  
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4794 posts, RR: 43
Posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3903 times:

Ok the wait is over, put all those rumors to rest as this is official on EKs website under flight schedules :

DXB-SFO route :
0815 DXB 1210 SFO EK 225 345-FJY - 15:55 Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su

SFO-DXB route :
2100 SFO 0025 DXB EK 226 345-FJY - 15:25 Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su

Schedule is valid from 1st Jan 05 to Mar 26th 05.

So all u SFO spotters start celebrating  Big grin

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3015 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3868 times:

I know why they are doing this.

It's so they can fly their A380 there when they get it!  Wink/being sarcastic Wink/being sarcastic Wink/being sarcastic



Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4932 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3820 times:

Brons2

I know why they are doing this.

It's so they can fly their A380 there when they get it!


Makes perfect sense to me too!!!  Big grin  Big grin  Big grin







Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineLH477 From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 584 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3789 times:

When is it coming to YYZ?

I thought that second the North American destination after JFK?




Come on you gunners......!!!!!
User currently offlineETStar From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3759 times:

Is this going to be a non-stop flight? What's the reason behind "Brons2: I know why they are doing this. It's so they can fly their A380 there when they get it!"?

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4794 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3737 times:

Yes all of EKs North American flights will be nonstop!!!

Next on the list are ORD-IAD-YYZ and LAX according to reports. Definitely ORD and YYZ for sure by the end of 2005!!!


User currently offlineNetdhaka From Bangladesh, joined Feb 2004, 183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3731 times:

It would be interesting to see if they will be able to fill up A380, if they choose to fly A380 to SFO. LAX might seem a better destination for them, as they are new in this market.

User currently offlineCoTXDFW777AA From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3727 times:

Do you think they will create a semi alliance to feed passengers from United's network. Why don't they serve IAH they already are good with CO and IAH has alot of oil traffic.

-COTXDFW777AA



Texas- it's like a whole different country!
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4932 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3683 times:

ETStar

Is this going to be a non-stop flight? What's the reason behind "Brons2: I know why they are doing this. It's so they can fly their A380 there when they get it!"?


SFO is ready to handle the A380-800 and LAX haven't made any changes to handle such an aircraft let alone the B747-400.

I hope this clears things up  Big grin





Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineFA4UA From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 812 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3651 times:

OK, so the A345 gets in at a bit past noon to SFO and then sits for nearly 9 hours? That doesn't sound right. Do they hop from SFO to another location? Just seems like a poor use of a very expensive asset. Most wide bodies, after an international run, can be turned in two to three hours without any problems... so why the 9 hour sit?

FA4UA



The debate continues... Starwood or Hyatt... which is better
User currently offlineND From Belgium, joined Feb 2004, 280 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3642 times:

I heard IAH was on the list...


ND - Hated By Many, Confronted By None
User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2008 posts, RR: 23
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3570 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

OK, all you armchair airline CEO's out there... There is no way EK will generate sufficient traffic from SFO (my home city) to fill an A380. This is unfortunately the typical adolescent wishful thinking so prevalently found here on a.net. The A345 is perfect for the route because the capacity is a much better fit with the anticipated traffic. Why SFO? Bechtel & Chevron. Why have a plane sit 9 hours? Ask QF and NZ... they've been doing it for years at LAX.


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4794 posts, RR: 43
Reply 12, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

The A 380 of EKs can only be filled up from NYC and LAX and maybe just maybe ORD...it all depends too onward alliance connections offered by CO (from EWR)-UAL (from ORD and LAX) etc.

Yes the A 345 is perfect for IAD-SFO and YVR...however I would prefer the A 346IGWs instead of the A 345s for ORD and YYZ launch flights as they have the potential to fill in the extra seats on the A 346!!!


User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5618 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3438 times:

"SFO is ready to handle the A380-800 and LAX haven't made any changes to handle such an aircraft let alone the B747-400."

What the heck does this mean??? LAX is the #1 Pax 747-400 airport in North America.
4-5 Daily QANTAS
3-4 Daily Korean Air + 1-777
3-4 Daily JAL
3-4 Daily Air New Zealand + 763s
4- Daily UAL + many 777s/763/76s
2-3 Daily British
2 Daily Asiana
2 Daily China Airlines
1-2 Daily Lufthansa + A340
1-2 Daily Air France soon to be 1 744 + 2 777s
1-2 Daily EVA Air
2 Daily Cathay Pacific (A340-600 being replaced)
Daily Virgin Atlantic + A340
Daily KLM
Daily Singapore + A340-500 + 777-200 (both daily
Daily THAI ( going to 4 wkly)
Daily Air China
Daily ANA (no 777 lately)
Daily NWA
Daily Philippine + A340
6 wkly Malaysian
4 wkly Air Pacific

Plus Air India 744 coming this year!

That's handling quite a few 747-400s in my book!

BN747






"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineSparky747 From Ireland, joined Feb 2004, 52 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3372 times:

Emirates always seem to park the aircraft up after the long trips. They did this in SYD and MEL before the introduction of the AUK flights. My guess is that it has to do with the flight connections in DXB. Most EK flights leave DXB at or around 0800 and then again at 0200. The arrivals into DXB are then timed at or around 0000 and again at or around 0500. If you are at DXB airport around these times then you will see what I mean. It gets very busy!

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4794 posts, RR: 43
Reply 15, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3360 times:

The main reason for those SFO timings is due to the best connections avbl for EKs tgt mkt which are the pax of the Indian Subcontinent region and neighbouring Arab states and East/Southern Africa!!!

User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4932 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3275 times:

BN747

"SFO is ready to handle the A380-800 and LAX haven't made any changes to handle such an aircraft let alone the B747-400."

What the heck does this mean??? LAX is the #1 Pax 747-400 airport in North America.

Maybe I should of clarified my self on this one....I have read about the bays at LAX being very tight and when handling the B747-400 aircraft they are towed into the bay on arrival.....

Sorry about that BN747 I'm a fan of the B747-400 too!  Big grin





Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineSV777KiloAlpha From Saudi Arabia, joined Dec 2003, 267 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3229 times:

A quick question:

What would the flight plan be like? Will they fly over Europe then cross the north Atlantic and into Canada, then north western US?
I can't see how they can do that in just 16 hrs? LHR-SFO takes 11hrs!!

 Big grin
HZ-AKA



PPL since 2006
User currently offlineRednose From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2002, 46 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3174 times:

According to the great circle mapper:

DXB (25°15'18"N 55°21'51"E) SFO (37°37'08"N 122°22'30"W) 7041 nm

This route takes then virtually over the North Pole, crossing Russia, the polar sea and Canada on the way.


User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3488 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3017 times:


EK will fly to SFO westbound,across the Atlantic,or eastbound,across the Pacific ? I bet on the first probability no ?


User currently offlineAs739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6153 posts, RR: 24
Reply 20, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2974 times:

FA4UA...many carriers have their planes sit for a ong time. Why does it make no sense? If the plane turns around and leaves its get into Dubai at a bad time. NZ will do the same thing when they starts in June. CX currently sits 12 hrs. NW NRT flight sits 6 hours. Before the scedule change SQ had a 772 sitting for 12 hours. Thats just in San Francisco. Look at LAX with all the Qantas,Air Pacific, and Air New Zealand planes sitting like all day. Its all about schedule.

Why is it such a suprise SFO got Dubai over LAX? They stated a year ago that JFK and SFO were going to be first and everyone chatted about it. Now they decide on SFO and people are surprised?

ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineAmhilde From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 643 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2814 times:



Sorry airhead question here but i dont want to sort out the math this early this morning- but what are the flight times on this route?



Hang on tightly, Let go lightly
User currently offlineRareBear From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 553 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2724 times:

Based on the distance stated above, I would expect a flight duration of 14-15 hours. Any other routing would increase this time.


Illegitimus non carborundum
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12482 posts, RR: 34
Reply 23, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2662 times:

It's actually written beside it, on the first post: 15h55 out, 15h25 back.



User currently offlineLEGACYINS From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2080 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2512 times:


As As739x stated, the EK routes were announced last year to include JFK and SFO only. There is nothing on their web page specifically stating LAX, IAH or other N.American sites. Yes, there is a site stating possible future route expansion but nothing definite.

Besides some individuals beliefs, the world does not rotate around LAX. SFO Is a separate destination and has nothing to do with LAX. This EK flight really does not have to do much with the companies based in the Bay Area but with the diverse populations from the sub continent. DXB Is a short flight from India/Pakistan/Yemen. These are the individuals who are going to be on this aircaft.

I'm looking forward to the flight touching down on SFO's 28s



John@SFO
User currently offlinePlanesarecool From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 4124 posts, RR: 11
Reply 25, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

QF009 from Melbourne and Singapore to London Heathrow arrives at 05:25 and then departs at 22:00. This means it sits on the ground for 16 hours and 35 minutes. It always happens at major airports.

-Stephen


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
United P.S. SFO To LAX! posted Wed Oct 18 2006 19:58:18 by Gkpetery
Who Will Take Over LAX-KIX? posted Fri May 12 2006 01:34:51 by UALAX
Landing In SFO Over Hills? posted Tue Jan 17 2006 02:24:02 by Apollo13
US SFO And LAX Hubs At Their Peak posted Sun Nov 20 2005 09:44:48 by Jfrworld
Song To Start BOS-LAX/SFO; BDL-LAX posted Wed Jun 1 2005 13:28:30 by DAL767400ER
UA Adds SAT-SFO SAT-LAX posted Thu Jan 13 2005 21:07:14 by CMB320
UA To Start SFO-COS, LAX-RNO, MYR-ORD, MYR-IAD posted Mon Dec 27 2004 21:13:19 by Iowaman
OO Facilities At SFO And LAX posted Mon Nov 15 2004 03:16:18 by Flyboy80
SQ B777-300ER To Serve SFO & LAX Nonstop? posted Sun Sep 5 2004 11:17:05 by Zvezda
VFR Routes Near/over LAX posted Thu Aug 19 2004 19:51:56 by Timz