Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Three New US Routes For Aer Lingus?  
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12432 posts, RR: 37
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5066 times:

I was reading an article in Irish Air Letter, an authoritative and long running monthly magazine on, well, Irish aviation. It said that if the current bilateral restrictions were scrapped, EI would add THREE (not two, as previously thought) new US routes within three months. As you know, EI has been growing very fast - and successfully - in Europe, so it's not surprising that the Irish government took this very seriously and it has already begun negotiations with the US authorities. Basically, what is expected to happen is an easing in the ratio of flights which have to stop at SNN, or operate to SNN as a supplement to DUB flights. Thus, if it went from 1:1 to 2:1, airlines would still operate the number of flights they currently fly to SNN, but have a "free" extra flight to/from DUB.

It does sound crazy, but the Shannon lobby has to be pacified, for Irish political reasons. What the US authorities will make of this is anyone's guess, but it's certainly better than a poke in the eye with a stick. EI will be the biggest beneficiary of a change, so maybe the three US carriers will ask for more and there may well be a time limit on this, so that the link will be phased out eventually. The EU will also want to take an interest in it.

The fly in the ointment is getting new aircraft. EI is currently reviewing its long haul fleet needs, with leases on the current 333s running out soon. A fine aircraft, but I think that with new technology available and the need for longer flights, better aircraft could be found. Also, if EI wants to launch services as fast as it says it does, whichever manufacturer can deliver this is obviously going to be in a good position when the time comes to replace the fleet. With EI having already ordered A320s, Airbus must be seen to be in pole position. BUT . . . EI wants to operate these routes quickly and it's in the gift of the US authorities. Now, guys, if you were to take Boeings, ooh, I think we could make things happen quite quickly . . .

Of course, it depends on 777s being readily available. Don't forget, Boeing would have an incentive to do business, as EI would be an ideal 7E7 customer.
Fanciful, perhaps? Why? If Boeing has any hope at all of getting its foot in the EI door again, this could be it. They might as well give it all they've got.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32734 posts, RR: 72
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5013 times:

Miami would undoubtley be one of the three routes. San Francisco would highly likely be the second. Dallas probably the third.

However, I wouldn't hold my breath on changes happening soon. As you mentioned, until Ireland does something about to the 50/50 rule, they are going to have a hard time getting new route authorities.



a.
User currently offlineTrident2e From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4961 times:

Kaitak - that's a very interesting post. Looks like you're an Irish citizen, so can you briefly explain why there is such political pressure to operate transatlantic flights through SNN.

Thanks.


User currently offlineSam the Lab From Ireland, joined Aug 2001, 232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4890 times:

Political pressure to keep up the business at Shannon ensuring that goms are kept in their soft jobs.

User currently offlineHaveric From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1247 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4843 times:

If US were to go under, I definitely see them coming to PHL.

User currently offlineTrident2e From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4835 times:

What's a gom then? Sounds interesting.

User currently offlineDstc47 From Ireland, joined Sep 1999, 1471 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4825 times:

Why should the US agree to any retention of the Shannon stopover in any future bilateral?

What does Ireland have as a bargaining counter - nothing.

It imposes costs and obligations on all carriers, but particularly on any US carriers who chose to serve Ireland. It is alien to any open skies agreements such as those made with others.

So what the Irish will look for and what the US will agree to could be very different,


User currently offlineMlsrar From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1417 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4800 times:

If US were to go under, I definitely see them coming to PHL.

I would have serious doubts about that, given the ability to feed and codeshare with AA. I could see DFW and MIA as logical expansion options, giving preferable South-American connections, but its just my .02.

I am also in agreement that there should be no retension of the SNN stops.



I mean, for the right price I’ll fight a lion. - Mike Tyson
User currently offlineARN From Sweden, joined Feb 2001, 263 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4751 times:

If they would extend runway 10/28 in Dublin beyond current 2637 meters to normal standards, it would almost reach into the Limerick area, given the smallness of this country.

If the same conditions would have been implemented in other countries, half of the US-bound SK-flights would have to land in Billund on route from CPH, flights from MXP had to land in Turin and flights from MAD had to descend into Santiago de Compostela etc.



User currently offlineStyles From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4730 times:

Interesting news. For some reason EI seems to be set on US expansion at the expense of any new non US long haul routes, such as the much rumoured CPT service as well as possibly KUL and/or SIN. I suppose EI would prefer to go with Airbus for long haul a/c but the point about needing metal soon if they were to go ahead may also open the door for Boeing to make a pitch. It is not too far off the mark to consider the political implications of a Boeing purchase. Will EI be returning the leased a/c at the lease end? If so, is anyone aware of the time line?

As for possible new US gateways I agree that MIA and SFO are good bets, but you may also see MCO as one.


User currently offline747firstclass From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4624 times:

The US might agree to a 2:1 ratio only on a specified, cast in stone, very, very short term transition period to the Shannnon requirement being permanently lifted.

User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12432 posts, RR: 37
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4573 times:

Okay, a few point:

A "gom" is a "gombeen man"; it's difficult to describe this to a non-Irish person. I believe the phrase has its origins in literature. Basically, it means a kind of croney - that might be the nearest description, but not a terribly bright one.

The SNN stopover dates back to about 1958, when the first EI t/a flights were operated, although SNN had already been designated the main transatlantic terminus for Ireland, back in 1945, when Ireland and the US signed their first bilateral. Up until the mid 1960s, many airlines - TWA, TCA (later Air Canada), Sabena, Swissair (ah, those names!) operated through Shannon, but as time went on and jets had longer range, they didn't need to, but Shannon had to be kept going, to Aer Lingus was lumbered with the obligation of flying through SNN. Remember that the Shannon region - including Limerick, Tipperary (not a long way from Shannon!) and Galway elects a significant number of TDs (Irish MPs) to the Dail, or parliament, so the government doesn't want to upset them.

Thankfully, things are getting better now and nonstop flights have been allowed since 1994, subject to the 50/50 provision. I think 747FirstClass is correct in saying that the US may agree to a deal which would allow a phased abolition of the stopover.

ARN; what do you mean by this? There are 120 miles between DUB and SNN; the current runway length is a little short, but A330-200s have been known to fly n/s to the US from the shorter runway, 16/34, which is only 6,800'. Modern twin jet airliners are very powerful on departure and the 330s are no exception. There is actually enough room WITHIN THE AIRPORT BOUNDARY to add another 1500' or so to the runway.

As for what routes might be added, MIA and SFO would seem to be the first two. PHL is a possibility if US Airways goes pop, but I'd imagine DFW would be left to American, as a codeshare with EI. Seattle, Denver and Phoenix have also been mentioned, but it will be interesting to see which one is picked (after the first two, which most people seem to agree on). However, MCO could also be chosen as an alternative to MIA.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Colour Scheme For Aer Lingus posted Mon Mar 17 2003 10:25:05 by Unique
New Airbus For Aer Lingus posted Tue May 16 2000 00:14:35 by AerLingus A330
Ryanair Launches Takeover Bid For Aer Lingus posted Thu Oct 5 2006 09:25:08 by Cxsjr
Status Of New US Routes? posted Sat Jul 15 2006 08:29:02 by Mah584jr
More 'Buses For Aer Lingus posted Mon May 1 2006 13:28:33 by EI321
New Hawaii Routes For DL posted Fri Dec 16 2005 18:20:48 by Skibum9
Any New LoCo Routes For BUD In The Summer? posted Mon Dec 12 2005 17:09:58 by Ushermittwoch
E-Jets Opening Up New US Routes? posted Tue Nov 8 2005 11:02:58 by FLY777UAL
New US Routes? posted Sat Sep 10 2005 21:38:10 by BHXDTW
Whats The Next Step For Aer Lingus? posted Tue Aug 30 2005 00:31:53 by EI321