Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
When Will We Stop Seeing "eyebrow Windows" On 737  
User currently offlinePropilotjw From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 589 posts, RR: 7
Posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 9728 times:

They took the "eyebrow windows" off the new production 717's and I was wondering if they were going to stop having them on the 737 anytime soon? I have talked to pilots on the MD-80 and 737 and they say that they really dislike them and they spend time trying to find stuff to put up to block the hot sun from coming through. Just wondering.

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTZTriStar500 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1452 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 9310 times:

Last year, Boeing approached to operators about this very topic and the studies were underway to remove them. I believe it will cut over next year to no eyebrow windows on the NG models. They will also offer a Service Bulletin to install blanking plates in those aircraft with existing eyebrows. I don't remember exact dates and more details as I have this at work.


35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
User currently offlineAirxLiban From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4511 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 9220 times:

are we talking about those windows above the cockpit?


PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
User currently offlineJe89_w From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 2360 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 9170 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Yes, the windows above the cockpit are called "eyebrow" windows because they look like eyebrows.

User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 8992 times:

Those are the 737's trademark, why remove them now? Those are actually cool looking.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 8863 times:

Eyebrow windows are existing from the 707/720/KC135 days...
They then continued to exist in 727 and 737s.
Then in the DC8, you find them too (larger) and the DC9 same size as well.
xxx
They did not bother me at all. Used to pack newspapers inside them.
Even had one shattered in a 707, funny thing.
"Skipper got mad, and hit his fist on it" - is a possible legend on the picture.
xxx
Are you a pilot, yes...? - If not, what bothers you...?
I do not worry about your IFE, so leave that worry to pilots and design engineers.
Airplanes are expensive enough, so why generate a TSO for a few more $$$,$$$.
The "looks" of an airplane is the least important thing for me.
If it flies good and brings revenues to my airline - is my only worry.
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlinePatches From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 8722 times:

I think it would make the 737 look more even more modern without the butt ugly eyebrow windows, It would look more like the 757,767,777 and with the wing-tips they recently added to the 737, I think this plane has many more prodution years left. One more thing, are there any pictures out their with a 737 without eyebrow windows? Thanks, Patches.

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17030 posts, RR: 67
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 8694 times:

As the Skipper says, looks have little to do with it. Most passengers can't tell the diff between a 737 and a 747, let alone care about eyebrow windows.

If the customers (pilots) dislike them, they will go.

BTW I am assuming that they used to be used for navigation?



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlinePropilotjw From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 589 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 8415 times:

"Are you a pilot, yes...? - If not, what bothers you...?
I do not worry about your IFE, so leave that worry to pilots and design engineers.
Airplanes are expensive enough, so why generate a TSO for a few more $$$,$$$.
The "looks" of an airplane is the least important thing for me.
If it flies good and brings revenues to my airline - is my only worry."

The reason Boeing stopped with them on the 717 was because not having windows there saves weight and there is also less maintenance when you don't have 4 extra windows. Thank you for your concern Skipper but this thread was only asking IF and/or WHEN Boeing will stop putting them on the 737. There was no comment from me about the looks of the aircraft. I am a pilot. I don't care about inflight entertainment. Removing the windows will save money as well.


User currently offlinePl4nekr4zy From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 465 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8274 times:

Those are the 737's trademark
What makes them the 737's trademark? Are you forgetting about the 707, 720, 727, that shared the same basic forward fuselage?

and with the wing-tips they recently added to the 737, I think this plane has many more prodution years left. One more thing, are there any pictures out their with a 737 without eyebrow windows?
Why would the "wing-tips" (they're called winglets Big grin) have anything at all to do with its production future? And there are no real pictures of a 737 minus her eyebrows because there aren't any to take pictures of.

And Propilotjw, take it easy on the Skipper, seems you were a little offended. Insane I agree with what he said about leaving these things up to the design engineers and such. Obviously airplanes are not designed to look cool, but I do think the eyebrow windows look pretty kick-ass...



"Don't forget to bring a towel!"
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3389 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8213 times:

I hope they dont get rid of all of em... if you ask me the 737 looks really good with the eybrows! Oh well, i suppose every great thing on this earth has a begining and an end. And I guess if they gunna go to the trouble of doing it there must be a good enough reason.



CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineSpike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1170 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8169 times:

It just goes to show how old a design the 737 really is, NG, winglets or not.

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17030 posts, RR: 67
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8053 times:

"If it ain't broken, don't fix it." The Russians still fly the Soyuz (ok, the "NG" Soyuz), well over thirty years after it first flew. It's safe and reliable too.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4782 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8018 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"It just goes to show how old a design the 737 really is, NG, winglets or not."

Which makes me wonder. Why after all this time, has it become a big enough issue to have the "eyebrow" windows removed?



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineFlyingColours From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2315 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8017 times:

I think the "Eyebrows" were used for star navigation in the early days but someone can correct me if I am wrong.

I think the windows do look cool but I doubt that I will shed a tear when they go I mean, Looks are not what decides if a plane is ecenomical. To Some the AN-224 is ugly (Honest) yet its the biggest thing out there and does its thing, nobody does not charter the aircraft because it might look ugly to them. In the end all that matters is the money in the bank.

Cutting them out will also save on MX... True and that is another reason why they are going to go.

Skipper... You punched out a window????

Phil
FlyingColours



Lifes a train racing towards you, now you can either run away or grab a chair & a beer and watch it come - Phil
User currently offlineTZTriStar500 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1452 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 7819 times:

More info from the Boeing source.....the eyebrow windows were a hold-out from the 707/727 design and were originally intended for forward vision during a turn. Boeing's contention is that with TCAS technology and the recent 717 removal, that they may no longer be necessary, but wanted operator/pilot imput before proceeding. The production cut-in for no eyebrows was planned for the 3rd quarter this year. Eyebrow windows last about 7-9 years or 5000 hours and cost from $1800-2500 a piece. Weight savings would be approx. 25 pounds. I have not heard any more information whether this proposal will actually happen.


35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
User currently offlineBoingGoingGone From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7724 times:

It just goes to show how old a design the 737 really is, NG, winglets or not.

Or how proven a design is.


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17030 posts, RR: 67
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7671 times:

Using the "old design" argument for the 737NG is like saying the A330 is just a slightly upgraded A300...

Yes, it is a tube with wings, but so are most planes from the DC-3 to the 7E7.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineSpike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1170 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7637 times:

Bo(e)ingGoingGone: The most perfect nose known to date 707/727/737. I think many people will always still see the 737-100 as 'the little pig' as it was known. The eyebrows gave the intelligent 'face' on all three types.

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17030 posts, RR: 67
Reply 19, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7595 times:

731 was also known as "Fat Albert". Cute.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineYossarian From Zambia, joined May 2001, 62 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7542 times:

Having flown the DC9 quite a bit, I can say that I personally found the eyebrow windows very useful in a turn. TCAS may make that redundant but a good lookout is always a good thing.

User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7502 times:

Actually, the 707 does not share the same nose as the 727/737 (which are identical. The only common part from the 707 to the smaller birds is the front windscreen--even the eyebrows and other cockpit windows on the crown are slightly different. Other than the front 'windows'--there are no other common external parts.

User currently offlineSpike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1170 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 7420 times:

I think it was Lufthansa that first termed the 737 as 'little pig', but I also think they were the actual world-wide launch customer for the type.

Can someone download an artists impression of a 737 without its eyebrows? It would look like it had been to a bad party!


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 23, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7316 times:

The Eyebrow windows on the 737s are very hard to look through, they make you fee like you are looking through a magnifying glass at some point. It made me feel kinda weird looking through those windows.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 7201 times:

If you go to Boeing's media center and click on the topic "737 Still Outsells All Boeing Products" (or the such)----there is the rendering of the 737 without the eyebrows.

User currently offlinePl4nekr4zy From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 465 posts, RR: 3
Reply 25, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 7053 times:

Are you forgetting about the 707, 720, 727, that shared the same basic forward fuselage? - Me

Actually, the 707 does not share the same nose as the 727/737 (which are identical. The only common part from the 707 to the smaller birds is the front windscreen--even the eyebrows and other cockpit windows on the crown are slightly different. Other than the front 'windows'--there are no other common external parts. - Greg

I should have been more clear in my first post, I meant they all share the same basic nose/cockpit features and top fuselage. The 727/737 has a smaller lower fuselage section because they weren't meant to carry as much cargo or something.




"Don't forget to bring a towel!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Will We See A B787 "In The Flesh"? posted Thu May 25 2006 17:39:35 by Speedmarque
When Will We See Europe - HNL Non-stop Service? posted Sun Nov 18 2007 12:03:50 by HNL-Jack
When Will All B6 A320 Have 36" Pitch (rows 1-11)? posted Sat Feb 17 2007 17:49:55 by JerseyGuy
When Will US Airlines Return To The "black?" posted Fri Feb 4 2005 18:16:44 by 7E72004
When Will We See More Room On AA 777s posted Mon Apr 2 2001 04:52:49 by FlyVirgin744
When Will We See An A380 In Alliance Livery? posted Fri Jan 13 2012 02:25:27 by MCO2BRS
When Will We See A Plane Like Concorde Again? posted Fri Oct 14 2011 12:44:37 by LGWflyer
When Will We See A Delta A330-200 posted Sat Aug 22 2009 09:36:01 by Blueman87
When Will We See PR's 777-300ER? posted Fri Jul 31 2009 19:32:10 by JetBlue777
When Will We See A320s In Delta Colors posted Sun Jul 13 2008 21:29:21 by Rwex414