Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
QF's New Landing Slots At LHR  
User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 5004 times:

does anyone know what time QF's two new daily landing slots at LHR are for?

the only statement i remember from QF was that they were for "peak times"..

cheers

QF744


IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMiami1 From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 706 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4918 times:

I think the slots where for 730am and 1330pm or close too it. However the word from the management team is that its being given too a regional airline in the short term as BA have kicked up a storm. they dont wont QF flying into London from other cities other than those covered by the JSA "joint services agreement"..which is a real bugger coz it would/will be great when/if QF increase thier flights.

User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4901 times:

my thoughts are that, as soon as VS have the approval to fly LHR-HKG-SYD, QF will:

-Announce a daily SYD-SHA-LHR

-Announce an additional MEL/SYD/PER/BNE - SIN - LHR service

another option would be SYD-KUL-LHR, especially with the "expected" Air Asia tie-in...

i think the slots are up their sleve and they won't announce them until the VS start-up details are finalised...

QF744



IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5359 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4876 times:

I did hear that they have to utilize 1 of these slots this year or something similar.

They need a BNE-SIN-LHR same plane service I think and also a MEL-BKK service, weather or not they would be allowed 2 daily BKK-LHR flights I don't no.


User currently offlineANstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5316 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4794 times:

QF can only utilise 1 pair of these slots with an Australian flight as the current UK-Aus rights is 28 flights per week for an Australian airline.
QF currently operate 21 flights per week. This means they can only increase by another 1 daily flight.

To throw a spanner in the works, backpackers express ahs also applied for some of the remaining 7 weekly flights menaing QF may miss out.

The info is on the IASC website


User currently offlineEham From Netherlands, joined Sep 2003, 448 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4631 times:

they better can introduce some services into Amsterdam (AMS) !  Smile

way better airport than LHR  Big thumbs up


User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3332 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4578 times:

I did not know about the 28 flights a week allotment - interesting.

Is that aircraft specific as well? And does anyone know what New Zealand's allotment is to the UK or how to find out?

Thanks
MH



come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineCrosscheck From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4550 times:

Hi ANstar, I looked up the IASC site, but could not find any information about "backpackers express", is this a new Australian airline? Also the information stating that there were only 7 return flights left available each week, is over 2 years old, is this info still current? Surely Qantas wouldn't spend all that money on landing slots, only to find out that they didn't have and couldn't get IASC approval to use them. Is it possible they already have the approvals?

Thanks


User currently offlineBacxboys From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 42 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4493 times:

Many points to be raised Here!
QF will never start services via KUL both BA and QF looked at KUL a few years to replace the current SIN as as asian stopover point.
BA then axed services to KUL as it was pulling in too much leisure traffic and not enough front end premium business.
Also another major sticking point for QF at present is VS and its proposed SYD service via Hong Kong.
Untill Cathay can get over the EU hurdle and start Its LHR/JFK service which at present is also being objected to by BMI to name a few, these new services by QF will not start as Cathay and the Hong Kong government will not allow VS to start and in turn VS will object to QF extra services!
Its all tit for tat in this area! And as for QF starting a LHR/PVG service!!! I can just see BA allowing that! Considering its just had clearance to start itself and with China Eastern still hoping to start services from LHR as well.
Having slots and buying them is one thing,actually using them is another!!


User currently offlineANstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5316 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4415 times:

http://www.iasc.gov.au/iasccurr.htm

This lists the current applications with the IASC.

It states that in both cases QF are after the total remaining capacity.
It then has a last nite saying Backpackers Xpress has also appled for this capacity...

So Interesting... Thier PVG application has been approved and is listed under Determinations & Decisions.
I cut and paste the attached...

******

Qantas has applied for an allocation of capacity on the India route - advertised on 23 February 2004 - Closing date for notice of intention to submit an application is COB 1 March 2004
Qantas is also planning to resume services to Mumbai with effect from September 2004. Qantas is seeking an allocation of 2100 seats per week which is the full allocation available to Australian carriers.

Qantas plans to initially operate 3 B747 services non stop between Sydney and Mumbai and add a further 2 services from as early as April 2005.

Update:
On 27 February Backpacker Xpress notified an intention to apply for capacity on the India route - applications close at COB 24 March 2004.
---
Qantas has applied for an allocation of capacity on the United Kingdom route - advertised on 23 February 2004 - Qantas application - Closing date for notice of intention to submit an application is COB 1 March 2004
Qantas currently operates 21 services per week between Australia and London via Singapore and Bangkok. Qantas is now seeking an allocation of an additional seven services per week in order to expand its operations to 28 services per week. As with the India application above this is the full allocation available to Australian carriers.

Qantas plans to operate an additional three services from November 2004 and the remaining four would be added over the 12 months to November 2005.

Qantas is seeking permission to price and market its services, and share/pool revenues/profits on the route, with British Airways as long as such practices are authorised under the Trade Practices Act 1974 or otherwise authorised by the Australian Competition Tribunal, in event of review by that Tribunal.

Update:
On 27 February Backpacker Xpress notified an intention to apply for capacity on the United Kingdom route - applications close at COB 24 March 2004.



User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4207 times:

so, does anyone know why QF purchased 2 additional daily landing slots?

something is going on here.... possibility of an offshore-registered carrier owned by Qantas taking on the slot?

or possibily as additional equity if they buy into Air NZ and transfer the slot to the Kiwis?

there could also be the possibility that the Australian-based carrier alotment may increase in the next 12 months?

someone working at BAA would be able to help us on this one!

QF744



IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8466 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4124 times:

If QF got the slots for a good price then it is worth it as an investment. I can see QF adding an Australia to LHR flight on a daily basis, especially if it can go through HKG.

User currently offlineSydscott From Australia, joined Oct 2003, 3188 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4094 times:


"so, does anyone know why QF purchased 2 additional daily landing slots?"

If you dont have the slots it doesn't matter how many new air services you get under the air services agreement you can't fly them to Heathrow!!! One must put the horse before the cart and now that QF has the access it is inevitable that route capacity will be expanded.

"something is going on here.... possibility of an offshore-registered carrier owned by Qantas taking on the slot?"

Definitely not. I can't imagine QF giving up the slots to anyone. They will use them to LHR via Hong Kong, Shanghai or Singapore. It doesn't matter which city it goes through because QF will profit share with BA anyway so both airlines are happy in that BA gets a new service without having to use its own slots & QF gets to fly more 747's/A380's to LHR.

"or possibily as additional equity if they buy into Air NZ and transfer the slot to the Kiwis?"

Two points. Firstly the ANZ/QF partnership will not go ahead. Competition authorities have put a stop to it and QF has already spent the money earmarked for the ANZ acquisition anyway. Secondly why on earth would you spend the money buying LHR slots only to give them away??? You wouldn't. Let the Americans/EU work out a new agreement and then sell them to the highest bidding US airline if your not using them.

"there could also be the possibility that the Australian-based carrier alotment may increase in the next 12 months?"

Very likely. I would say the Australia/England bi-lateral will have some work done on it shortly.

The question I have over the new LHR slots is where is the 747-400 capacity going to come from to fly them??? QF certainly doesn't have any lying around and I doubt that QF would fly the 747-300's to LHR. Does this mean QF will buy more 747-400's this year???


User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4066 times:

good points there Sydscott...

i guess if they do ratify the air sevices agreement, then that will help..

wasn't there talk of QF taking some 744s from BA?

they could always use some of UA's that are sitting in the desert!!

if there is an increase, i agree... it will be out of Shanghai, Hong Kong and Singapore for the stop-over...




IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Landing Slots At DCA posted Wed Jul 5 2000 23:41:31 by 747firstclass
AF/KLM Spinetti: Could Help CO Get Slots At LHR posted Thu Jun 15 2006 07:48:21 by Scotron11
Malev Has Swapped Slots At LHR For LGW With BA posted Tue Jun 6 2006 16:24:38 by Richardw
Landing Runways At LHR posted Thu Jan 19 2006 12:47:06 by Madairdrie
Who Controls The Slots At LHR posted Sat Oct 22 2005 20:36:47 by SunriseValley
BA And QF Will Share T5 At LHR! posted Fri Oct 21 2005 12:52:01 by Concorde001
New Airline Structure At LHR When T5 Opens posted Tue Jun 7 2005 00:52:20 by FlyAUA
Air New Zealand Slots At NRT posted Wed Mar 16 2005 11:01:39 by ZK-NBT
BA "babysitting" VS Slots At LHR posted Sun Nov 28 2004 12:43:37 by GKirk
Gulf Air Opens New F/J Class Lounge At LHR posted Sat Sep 4 2004 01:36:20 by GF-A330