Ghost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5165 posts, RR: 52 Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1501 times:
Good for AM! I think MX and AM should fight for getting more passengers from the US, Canada to CUN its simply amazing CUN's traffic and prescense from world carriers and Mexican airilnes lacks of prescene.
I've been told that in the last year (2003) CUN traffic raised 100.000 operations from the usual. Today also CUN gets around 500 operations in 1 day compared to MEx with 900 in one day. Traffic its dramaticaly increasing day by day. Lets see what else AM come's up with now that FF is leading the airline.
Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
CAL From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 498 posts, RR: 9 Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1494 times:
Well the CUN service is to remain , Not seasonal. I worked for AeroMexico in MIA for a few years and my Father is the US Director of Sales and Marketing. The aircraft will be an MD-80 series most of the time. The aircraft goes MEX-MIA-CUN-MIA-MEX. Hope that's some good info for you. If you need anymore info about AeroMexico ask me. Can find out some stuff for you.
PS. I pray that AeroMexico does not get taken over with the Mexicana name.
CAL........Continental Airlines....... Work Hard, Fly Right
EddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7430 posts, RR: 43 Reply 6, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1462 times:
Yes, it seems to me that Mexican carriers need to do more international routes to/from CUN. I think they won't get a lot of passengers who pay the highes, unrestricted fares (although there will be some business passengers due to the heavy investment from Europe in the Mayan Riviera), but they will have very high load factors so I think they can manage to make a profit, even if it is small. I look forward to seeing more MX and AM international routes ex-CUN.