Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
WN Adding Cities From PHL?  
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 43
Posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3405 times:

On today's US Airways video presentation, Dave Siegel said, "Southwest is coming to Philadelphia in May. They just announced today more flying in June and July, a new set of cities."

Sounds like Dave knows something that the rest of us don't--as well he should--and it sounds like he let the cat out of the bag. As far as I know, WN didn't make any announcements today. Anybody know what Dave's talking about?


I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSwacle From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 393 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3373 times:

Nothing frim that I know about, but rumor has it that WN will have upwards of 80 flights from PHL by summer 05, so...


Aircraft Flown: SF3 DH8 DH4 328 ERJ CRJ CR7 CR9 E70 E75 D9S M80 712 72S 732 733 734 735 73G 738 739 739ER 752 318 319 32
User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3297 times:

As it has been pointed out by a few people on here, WN has made moves at PHL that really haven't been seen before unless they intend on making an airport a large station. I have a feeling that PHL will come under WN fever fairly soon and quickly once they start serving here.


Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlinePHLapproach From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1250 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3300 times:

BN Service starts on May 9th, they plan to start off with 14 flights a day. WN will also be building about 4 new gates in terminal D. I believe most flights will be going to FLL, MHT and BWI many others also. But don't forget about Frontier coming in on May 23rd, I'm sure they won't be a threat to any body. I can't wait to basically see a different tail on every flight Big grin

User currently offlineCanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2843 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3277 times:

WN has been pulling people out of various cities to make this start. Most WN employees are pretty excited about the start of service to PHL, don't be surprised if you see lots of added service from them out of PHL.

I talked to some local WN people about the start, and it seems a lot of their employees in cities that were, perhaps, overstaffed are going there. As WN is not an airline to add lots of new service to any one city or create service to more than a couple cities per year, it is a very big announcement and/or opportunity.

I think someone mentioned in another topic about PHL that WN is setting up their own provisioning/catering there. Something I would assume they limit to cities that are less than 30 flights a day, who knows what they have planned there, but I would imagine anything is possible.



The beatings will continue until morale improves
User currently offlineBnatraveler From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 412 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3241 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Of the 58 (59 airports) cities WN has, there are no more than 10 (I don't know the exact number) provisioning bases.

For WN to open a provisioning base at the outset is definitely new--I don't beleive that they have ever done that before. New Orleans *just* got a provisioning base and they have been there forever.

I don't know a city where they have less than 50 flights per day that they have a provisioning base--so guess where they are going!


User currently offlinePHLapproach From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1250 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3127 times:

hmm, I see I made a mistake in my earlier post. I put BN instead of WN, opps.

User currently offlineUsairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3124 times:

According to the Philly Inquirer Southwest was planning on making an announcement about PHL today. They said that Southwest planned to double it's service in PHL over the summer and add another 3 or 4 destinations.

Not surprising, we all know more Southwest expansion at PHL is coming. Just wondering if Southwest will really make an announcement today.


User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4166 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3066 times:

There must be something WN sees at PHL that I don't. I flew there there in late February, on a MHT-PHL-Nassau route. My connecting flight from PHL-NAS was a 10:30am departure during a weekday...certainly not the 'peak' hour for departures. Anyway, we were among 17-20 jets in line for takeoff...on a spectacularly clear morning. Now, I know that WN depends on 'turn-time' to keep things in synch. One really late departure out of PHL cascades down the line, so that by the time that **one** jet ends its day, it could be HOURS late. Is this whole PHL thing doomed to wreak havoc on the WN recipe???

User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5209 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3035 times:

Not if Southwest's recipe is to destroy US Airways in Philadelphia. I agree about tha delays; PHL seems to be an odd choice--but once US is out there will be far less congestion and peak travel times. Things should become very interesting this summer.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineQuickmover From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2502 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3011 times:

Here it is.
Looks like armageddon.


Southwest Airlines Announces More Flights for Philadelphia; Aggressive Expansion Planned This Summer

......Effective July 6, 2004, Southwest will begin 14 additional daily nonstop flights to the following cities: Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood (one daily), Houston Hobby (one daily), Los Angeles International Airport (one daily), Manchester, N.H. (four daily), New Orleans (one daily), Raleigh/Durham (four daily), Tampa Bay (adding one nonstop for a total of two daily); and West Palm Beach (one daily).

As previously announced, Southwest Airlines will begin its Philadelphia service May 9, 2004, with a total of 14 daily nonstop flights to the following cities: Chicago Midway (three daily), Las Vegas (one daily), Orlando (three daily), Phoenix (one daily), Providence (five daily), and Tampa Bay (one daily).



User currently offlineWagz From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 517 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2986 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The article in the Inky today also mentions US's arrival and departure pushes currently used, of which there are 4. In my experience, there will be a huge arrival cascade of US flights, then a huge departure bank of mainly US flights (which we were lucky enough to watch up on the A Parking deck on Sunday).

Our friend Dave mentioned restructuring those 4 banks of flights so that flights arrive and depart more smoothly now, instead of all at once. I beleive it was intended to reduce the ammount of manpower required, but it sounds like it might also help alleviate delays on the ground. That could definately be advantageous to WN.

The artcile also mentioned a WN announcement today along the lines of doubled service by July. I think someone else already noticed odd schedule changes for existing cities around that time as well (ie: way more than 30 minutes between flights, hinting that new flights would fill the gaps).

All in all, it should get very interesting around here soon.

EDIT: I just saw Quickmover's message. 28 daily flights in less than 2 months at PHL. Considering BWI started at 8 flights daily, this indeed looks like all-out war in PHL.

Joe Wagner

[Edited 2004-03-25 19:19:49]


I think Big Foot is blurry, Its not the photographers fault. Theres a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside
User currently offlinePHLapproach From Philippines, joined Mar 2004, 1250 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2927 times:

Here is a little WN PHL route map with some starting prices and more cities to be served via PHL. http://www.southwest.com/cities/philadelphia.html

User currently offlineJeffie813 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 239 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2905 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

WN is great at jumping right into the fray.

here @ PBI, we already have two daily non-stops to PHL on US and FL has a daily non-stop to PHL also. i wonder if FL's flight will survive the "fight".


User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3420 posts, RR: 16
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2826 times:

WOW, no doubt they are trying to rid aviation of US now. WN has never grown a city this fast. I guess Siegel is right, they better right the US ship real soon or it's over...I hope it doesn't happen, but it just doesn't look too good for US right now...

User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2725 times:

I find most fascinating the PHL-LAX service...Southwest vs. Frontier in this market...their first "head-to-head" battle so to speak...should be very interesting...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2700 times:

Anyway, we were among 17-20 jets in line for takeoff...on a spectacularly clear morning. Now, I know that WN depends on 'turn-time' to keep things in synch. One really late departure out of PHL cascades down the line, so that by the time that **one** jet ends its day, it could be HOURS late. Is this whole PHL thing doomed to wreak havoc on the WN recipe???

From what I heard, WN will be operating out of the currently unoccupied terminal towards the end of the runways. This means after a Southwest aircraft lands, it can roll almost straight into its terminal, whereas a US aircraft must taxi the lenght to the runway back to the US Airways terminal. This signifcantly reduces WN's turnaround time and keeps them moving within their performance goals.

Has anyone from Philly heard this? I read this in the Dallas Morning news months ago, so I might be getting some of the details wrong  Big grin

Regards,
DFW


User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 32
Reply 17, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2695 times:

I too have noticed this Greg. I think it's going to basically be a battle of products when it comes to WN v. F9 PHL-LAX. They both have low cost structures so they should be able duke it out on the price front pretty closely to eachother (which is great because US and UA will have to lower their fares to LAX if they want to try to hang on). WN, you get a 73G with nothing special. F9, you get an A319 with PTV's and DirectTV. This battle will be one to watch.


Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineJetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3019 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2666 times:

I really do think that this is an attack on US. I would think that PHL-LAX, PHL-RDU, PHL-MHT, PHL-PBI, and PHL-FLL are all profitable (or not big losers) for US. This is really going to hurt US and can kill them if they don't shape up. I really don't hope it happens, but it doesn't look good for them.

But on the bright side, I'm happy to see WN expanding and giving the good people of Philly low fares to cities that have long had a monopoly by US.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 32
Reply 19, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2649 times:

DFW,
Actually you're kind of ass backwards there  Smile The main runway for landings at PHL is 27R, and I'm sure that WN will have no problem setting down on 35 if the winds are right. Anyways yes, 27R is the main runway for landing. The threshold of the runway starts basically a bit before Terminal F. By the time you roll out, you're already down to Terminal B or further (I'm using this reference point as general when landing in a 737/A320 aircraft or something comparable of size. US aircraft can turn right off of the runway and scoot right into Terminal A (or A-West for Int'l service), B or C. NW, HP, CO, UA, and DL have the longest taxi-back times (as will WN if they get stuck in a conga line trying to get back to D).

And it's always fun trying to get form Terminal D or E to 27L to take-off. If you're there in a high-traffic time, it's excruciating waiting to take-off as all of the departures are coming from every which way congregating on the taxiways in between the two runways. Oh it's a lot of fun.

[Edited 2004-03-26 00:12:54]


Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2581 times:

Actually you're kind of ass backwards there

Lol.. that's the last time I use the Dallas morning news for anything aviation related. Thanks for setting me straight.  Smile

Regards,
DFW


User currently offlineMD11LuxuryLinr From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1385 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2537 times:

It's even better in crappy weather when the winds shift to the east. Arriving WN jets are going to have to leave 9R and take the long trek down sierra (passing lines of stacked up US jets on the taxiways waiting to cross 9L)and hold on echo. If they're lucky, there will be a heavy jet depart and they'll get to cross while the next is holding for the wake. For departing, they'll have to taxi waaaaaaaaay down to 9L and join the six dozen US craft already in line...

Good luck WN  Big thumbs up



Caution wake turbulence, you are following a heavy jet.
User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4166 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2494 times:

...From what I heard, WN will be operating out of the currently unoccupied terminal towards the end of the runways. This means after a Southwest aircraft lands, it can roll almost straight into its terminal, whereas a US aircraft must taxi the lenght to the runway back to the US Airways terminal...

Well, that's all well and good when they are landing in a certain direction. But when they land in the OTHER direction that 'advantage' turns into a huge 'disadvantage.' And, you talk about landings. For every landing, you have a take-off, and the scenario I was describing has to do with departures. Now, as a resident of New Hampshire not far from MHT, I'm thrilled at us getting 4x daily to/from PHL. I hope it all works well. I have literally seen a WN jet STOP at its gate 30 seconds after touching down at MHT...that's 30 seconds after the wheels hit the concrete. That's incredible, but it's also something that'll never happen at PHL. Now, I realize that WN also serves other (even busier) airports...LAX to name one. I guess if they can make LAX work they can make PHL work. Go WN!


User currently offlineERJ From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 245 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2413 times:

There's an unoccupied terminal at PHL? I thought they were going to operate out of D, which as of Tuesday morning wasn't empty.

As a Philly resident, I only care that Southwest's arrival will force the other airlines to drop their fares. I don't plan to ever fly them out of PHL, but the competition should save me a hundred bucks or so from PHX on HP.

Now that I think about it, maybe the rapid expansion of WN in PHL could be political. US employs a lot of people there and Mayor Street and Governor (former Philly mayor) Rendell are very interested in making sure jobs stay there. Perhaps the plan is to replace the jobs that will be lost as US fails. Anyone second this theory??


User currently offlineUa815 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2371 times:

When I was down at PHL last Saturday, the curbside check-in sign for Southwest (already up and illuminated) was at E. Wasn't ATA moved from E to A-East to make room for WN?

25 PHLapproach : I think last Sunday I did see ATA was over at E, but the A-East is wrong they are not over there.
26 Post contains images Tjwgrr : PHL routes:
27 USflt1778 : ATA moved to Terminal A-East in January. Some of their signage is still in place at Terminal E (e.g., skycap counter at the curb) but they are long go
28 Post contains images Wagz : Alright, to make things a little clearer for my discussion: http://www.myairplane.com/databases/approach/NorthEast/PHL_.pdf Hmmm, the forum software d
29 USAFHummer : I also think WN will use 27R for takeoffs as well when the arrival flow slows down as thats nice and close to E and avoids all the problems of 27L tak
30 DeltaMD11 : I honestly don't see a problem with a 27R taekoff as long as you don't have another aircraft on finals and you have adequate spacing between someone o
31 Post contains images OPNLguy : >>>If the WN pilots touch down on the first 5 feet of concrete and slam on the brakes (and I wouldn't put it past them), Now, c'mon, do we really need
32 Post contains images PHLapproach : Now I'm gonna keep this simple. WN will operate the same as all the other airlines in PHL, US, HP, ATA, FL, BA, LH, AF, DL, UA, NW, AA and others (sor
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways Is More Flights To 12 Cities From PHL posted Thu Jul 22 2004 19:05:24 by ScottysAir
Why Doesn't WN Move From PHL To PNE posted Fri Jul 29 2005 07:16:16 by Jdwfloyd
WN: No Connecting Service To GEG From PHL posted Tue Oct 5 2004 20:24:59 by PHLBOS
WN Destinations From PHL posted Tue Dec 16 2003 08:20:57 by Nm19371
USAirways Cuts Local Fares To 17 Cities From CLT posted Wed Oct 25 2006 21:46:45 by KarlB737
Official WN IAD Cities And Fares! posted Fri Jul 14 2006 01:30:38 by OOer
US Airways To End Service To Four Cities From PIT! posted Sat Mar 25 2006 00:34:55 by CentPIT
Why WN To Nashville From OKC? posted Wed Mar 22 2006 02:59:58 by Starstream707
April 2 Midwest Airlines Adding Flights From MKE posted Thu Feb 9 2006 23:59:02 by MidEx717
WN's New Destination From PIT? posted Wed Jan 25 2006 22:54:35 by Kubus