Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would The 707 Have Flown Without The Comet?  
User currently offlineSpike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1170 posts, RR: 5
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2900 times:

How far ahead was the development of the Comet to the 707? Who really developed the avionics that first flew a commercial lump of metal into the sky? And what lessons were learnt from both jets?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 977 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

The Comet flew many years before the 707, so in that respect, it did beat the 707. However, the Comet was plagued by a serious design defect- square windows and metal fatigue. Turbojet engines allowed the Comet to cruise higher than any airliner before it, requiring a pressurized cabin. Long story short, square windows put unequal pressure on the window corners and metal fatigue was more extreme than exepected, causing depressurizations and crashes.

The 707 was built with a stronger aluminum alloy and rounded windows, eliminating these risks. The 707 was far superior in range, payload, and economics, and the rest is history.

To answer the question "Would the 707 have flown anyway" I would say yes the 707 would have eventually been built. The 707 was spurred by a potential Pan Am order and a potential KC-135 contract, not a pissing contest with de Havillan. In fact, Douglas, Lockheed, and Boeing lobbied Congress in the 1950s for funding to build a passenger jet before the Comet, but Congress denied them any public funds.

Regards,
DFW

[Edited 2004-03-28 20:14:05]

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13208 posts, RR: 77
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2792 times:

Yes, but maybe not as soon, no doubt work was speeded up when the Comet appeared, even before the 1954 Comet 1 grounding Comet 2 and bigger Comet 3's were under development, Pan Am optioned some of the latter.
Though some airlines, notably the CEO of AA, at the time doubted that jets would have an impact for many years, clearly the emergence of the Comet got things moving .
Had the Comet 1 not had the problems (which you can bet that other manufacturers took notice of, DH after all were being extremely pioneering, sometimes you pay for that), the Comet 2 and especially Comet 3, could have sold in the US domestic market, I doubt that Boeing, Douglas, Lockheed, or any major US planemaker would have just stood and watched that happen.


User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2747 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Of course it would have. France developed the Caravelle and your not asking about that. As has been said all manufacturers note the others problems and all nations technologies build on each others, that's called progress. But the individual programs are shaped by the perceived markets and expected market share.

I'm assuming you are alluding to the unnecessary acrimony pouring out from the A380 and 7E7 projects. These are completely different aircraft meant to fill completely different rolls. I do not understand why each cannot be left alone to compete by themselves. We can only assume that this vehemence stems from the old 'subsidy by any name' complaint (my quote) from both sides.



Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineClassicLover From Ireland, joined Mar 2004, 4636 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2635 times:

The first flight of the Comet versus the 707 is 1949 versus 1954. So the Comet was way ahead of the 707. I think the proposal for the Comet was first mooted in 1943.

As far as I am aware, all of the systems used in the Comet were of British design and manufacture.

Lessons learned? A lot was learned about metal fatigue for jet airliners, which was vastly different to the previously known effects with piston engined jets. That's what the Comet taught people. Additionally, the Comet was not made overly well. Thin metal structure (this can be forgiven), flight controls with no feedback... other things...

Lessons learned from the 707? That jet aircraft can be successful and are the way of the future.

Trent.  Smile



I do quite enjoy a spot of flying - more so when it's not in Economy!
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5236 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2600 times:

Yes, the 707 would have flown without Comet crashes. First of all, it was an outgrowth of the KC-135 program. That meant that Boeing had the finances to create a commercial jetliner.

Second, the Comet never had the range and payload of the 707. Even the Comet 3, which was first on the North Atlantic run, only carried about 2/3rds of the Boeing payload, and it didn't have the range to fly West Coast to Europe.

Third, I think the Comet flew at about 500 mph, while the 707 flew at around 600 mph. On a 4000 mile flight, the 707 is about 1 hour quicker.

Lastly, the 707 was a better design, since it didn't bury the engines in the wing. That made engine maintenance easier.


User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5520 posts, RR: 28
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2587 times:

Ah, but no matter how much I love the 707 (and I do), the Comet 1 was such a graceful ship, thanks in large measure to the engine placement.


...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlineClassicLover From Ireland, joined Mar 2004, 4636 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2578 times:

The Comet 4 was first on the North Atlantic run, Ckfred.

The Comet was slower, that is true. However, I wouldn't say that burying the engines in the wing is a "better design".

From what I've read, the Comet 4 was an absolute delight to fly compared to the Comet 1 and the 707.

You might want to read "Comets and Concordes" by Peter Duffey. He flew the Comet 1, Comet 4, 707 and the Concorde (among others) and has some very interesting insights on the aircraft. The book is a top read!

Trent.  Smile



I do quite enjoy a spot of flying - more so when it's not in Economy!
User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1872 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2541 times:

In my opinion, the 707 would have flown. However, without the Comet, it would have been the first, and, as a consequence,probably experiencing the same problems as the Comet.
All the jet technology was new, with no computer simulation and design. As a result, progress comes from previous experiences. And if you are the first, you experience all the problems. If you are the second, you can review your design.
Teva



Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineKEESJE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2505 times:

Would the 707 have been a succes if it was based on the Comet design ?

I don't think so ..



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Plane (Reg) You Have Flown On The Most Times? posted Fri Mar 26 2004 21:55:16 by Jkw777
Different A/C You Have Flown On The Same Route posted Sun Mar 7 2004 00:56:09 by ElectraBob
The Worst Airline You Have Flown On And Why posted Fri Nov 21 2003 16:11:08 by Qantasclub
List The Airlines You Have Flown On posted Thu Aug 28 2003 05:33:42 by Jafa
Name All The Airlines That Have Flown BOS-NYC-WAS posted Mon May 12 2003 08:14:41 by Zrs70
How Many Airlines Have Flown The A320-100? posted Wed Jul 10 2002 11:34:04 by Cmchardyfl
The Fastest You Have Flown? posted Sun Jan 13 2002 12:13:36 by Dauphin
Why Would Airlines Make The A380 Have More Comfort posted Mon Apr 9 2001 01:33:57 by Boeing in pdx
The Number Of Times You Have Flown Before posted Fri Dec 15 2000 19:21:36 by United Airline
Aircraft That You Have Flown The Most On... posted Wed Aug 2 2000 01:50:10 by TWA902fly