Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Beautiful Airport For Rent! (YMX)  
User currently offlineYULtoPEI From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 218 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3120 times:

What to make when an airport does not serve any more an airport?
It is what ADM (aeroports de Montreal) will try to discoverer in two weeks while trying to rent YMX !!!

the Experts of ADM are at present to prepare an international invitation to tender.

all option are open, ADM said that some promoter ask some offer for doing hospital, a casino, a exposition center or a movies studios. But two others projects are very interesting. To create a a center of formation and drive for the commercial aircraft or with the new security rules in all airport, a center of formation for the future custom officer.

But said James Cherry of ADM " no question of rent YMX to an enterprise who would like to establish passenger flight or heavy industrial industry"
in addition of this two things, all other option are open.

Are you interesting....
this is the feature of this beautiful place...

the ground of the airport area are so big, a modern open surfaces terminal, a granite floor and a parking of 5813 places.
the Extra things : an hotel of 355 rooms with 3 restaurants, one bar, one ballroom and a atrium.

and for complete the last update of the airport...
1993 - 5M$ for the parking
1993 - 2M$ for the unloading passager dock
1995 - 7M$ for new the footbridge and slots
1998 - 3M$ for cargo expansion

if you want to do a offer please go on http://www.admtl.com

regard




PEI in Colombia!!!. [Canon T2i]
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineYULtoPEI From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3046 times:

ahhh yes i forgot.... Picture!!! :-d


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Marian Musil
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jean-Pierre Bonin



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jean-Pierre Bonin
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Maxime Prévost-Desjardins



Thank's to all this photographers.



PEI in Colombia!!!. [Canon T2i]
User currently offlineAeroflot777 From Russia, joined Mar 2004, 3008 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2991 times:

Why isn't this airport used now?.......

User currently offlineSAA-SAL From Belgium, joined Nov 2000, 356 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2890 times:

Yes, could someone well informed please give us the reason why this airport is falling in complete dissuse. I seem to remember that it was to far from the city center; but then why did they construct it in the beginning? Looking at the photos it still looks good. What a shame


SAA B747 SP, Luxavia B747 SP
User currently offlineUTA_flyingHIGH From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2844 times:

When they built YMX in the 70's, they based themselves on Montreal's growth up to that date and projected the city would keep on growing at that rate, thus needing a large airport far apart from the city.
Wrong move as Montreal's expansion did not go at all as planned and YMX stayed in the middle of the countryside with the rabbits and wolverines (hey, it's Quebec).

UTA



Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
User currently offlineQb001 From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2053 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2731 times:

Just to add to what UTA said.

The plan also was to shut down YUL. But that didn't happen because AC opposed to it. As for why AC opposed to closing down the old, dusty YUL and refused to move to the nice and modern YMX, your theory is as good as any.

For a time, there was a split between YUL and YMX: YUL served the North American market and YMX served the international market. That split proved to be a total catastrophe for Montreal.

So, after it took the airport authorities 25 years or so to realize their mistake, they decided it was time to focus on using only one airport.

They had the choice between shutting down the old, ugly, dusty, dark, no room to expand or add runways, submitted to a curfew YUL, or the new, beautiful, clean, bright, with room to add 4 runways and terminals, and free of any curfew, YMX.

And, as anyone in their right mind would do (cough cough), they decided to shut down YMX.

So, that's the (very very very sad) story.

Everything is not lost for YMX though. It is still used for all cargo operations (Fedex, UPS and others). And it is also used to shoot movies, when an airport setting is needed. One of GM's recent commercial was shot there, and Steven Spielberg's next film - apparently the story of a man who had to stay 18 months or so at JFK - was also partially shot at YMX!



Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory.
User currently offlineAirbusfanYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2002, 1434 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2700 times:

Conventional wisdom is that YMX was built so far away from Montreal and without any quick links to the city (i.e. train/subway) that it failed.
Unlike IAD (Dulles) where development filled in between the main city and the airport, no such major development/Housing/industries are located between Montreal and YMX. My $0.02
There are others here that may be able to give you more quantitative analysis.

Cheers,
Kaz



t.dot photography
User currently offlineZrb2 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 896 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2637 times:

Do they not have automobiles and buses in Montreal? Seems strange that the main reason it didn't prosper is because of no mass transit.

User currently offlineAC183 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 1532 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2591 times:

When YMX was built it was assumed that SST's were on the way. So it was distant from the city because the idea was that long runways and large separations from population due to noise were necessary.

Montreal is on an island, and faced with the drive from YMX through Laval, over congested bridges and through the city to get to the business districts - and the lack of a rail link as an alternative to that - made YMX undesirable.

The largest passenger market in Canada is YYZ-YUL. YMX is too far from the city to serve the market for short haul traffic. The need to serve both long and short haul markets from the same facility made returning to YUL the only possible choice.


User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2534 times:


YMX was doomed right from the start.

YMX was not a mistake in itself. The first faux pas were the previsions made by obscure so-called aviation experts that lead govt officials to believe that aerial traffic in Montréal would be about 4 times bigger by 2000. Had it been true, YUL would never have been able to cope with that kind of traffic…

In late 60’s, non-stop flights were still limited in terms of distance. Hence, the need to make a stop halfway made people in Montréal believe that YMX would be an ideal stop for flights between Europe and Western, Southern USA and Central America.

Obviously, new jumbo jets with higher range made that stop needless in the 70’s.

And even worst, the site was not even chosen when they designed YMX so they designed the main terminal in the Northern part of the site without knowing that most people would be coming from the South, making it even more inefficient considering the infrastructures there…



E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16283 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2407 times:

The first faux pas were the previsions made by obscure so-called aviation experts that lead govt officials to believe that aerial traffic in Montréal would be about 4 times bigger by 2000.

True, but why was Montreal the only city to build a massive airport that was not needed? Pickering was shelved as the same time that YMX was approved. It just proves that YMX was nothing more than a make-work project for Quebec.

Aviation is booming. Passengers have more than doubled since 1975 and yet here in Canada we are closing an international airport that should never have been built. How embarassing for Montreal, Quebec and Canada.

What a waste of tax dollars.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineQb001 From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2053 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2272 times:

Unlike IAD (Dulles) where development filled in between the main city and the airport, no such major development/Housing/industries are located between Montreal and YMX.

I'm sorry to say this is entirely false.

There are 2 regions in Quebec that are very prosperous. First, there's the golden triangle, going from Montreal to Sherbrooke to Quebec City, where the unemployment rate is around 4%.

The other is the region north of Montreal, through Laval and all the way to Mt-Tremblant (the highway 15 corridor), with an unemployment rate of around 6%. This region has the largest population boom in Quebec. That's where I live. And that's where YMX is located.

From Montreal to YMX now, it's an almost uninterrupted chain of houses and industries.

As I said, there are absolutely no rational to support the decision to close YMX instead of YUL. The reasons that we were told to justify this closure proved to be lies, the same way GWB justifications to invade Iraq are lies (more catastrophic consequences with those lies - of course).

Any theory to explain that decision is as good as the next. Those who really know don't speak. But it is a major waste of money, no doubt about that.


True, but why was Montreal the only city to build a massive airport that was not needed?...It just proves that YMX was nothing more than a make-work project for Quebec.

First, nobody knew at the time it was not needed. Actually, if the government had stuck to the original plan, YMX would be fully functional now and YUL would not exist. Also, keep in mind that Montreal was still under the euphoria of the very successful Expo 67 and the Olympics were coming to town. All of those events created this atmosphere were investments were needed.

I would have preferred that YMX was not built in the first place. But now that it's built, it should be used to it's full potential and in order to do so, YUL should be shut down. But as I said, don't look for any rational as to why the opposite happened...



Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory.
User currently offlineSkywatcher From Canada, joined Sep 2002, 460 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

The reason AC didn't want to move is because they have a major mantenance base at YUL employing in excess of a thousand employees with hundreds of miliions of $$$ invested.

Please stop the biased post mortem about YMX. It's over.The arguing went on for 25 years to the detriment of the economy of Montreal as a whole.Stop it already.

The more interesting question is what will happen with the facilities now. This should be really interesting.


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16283 posts, RR: 56
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2154 times:

Actually, if the government had stuck to the original plan, YMX would be fully functional now and YUL would not exist. Also, keep in mind that Montreal was still under the euphoria of the very successful Expo 67 and the Olympics were coming to town. All of those events created this atmosphere were investments were needed.

Yes, I agree QB001. The ADM (or its predecessors) should have closed YUL immediately after opening YMX or soon after.

The more interesting question is what will happen with the facilities now. This should be really interesting.

Yes, I agree Skywatcher.





Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4980 posts, RR: 51
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2123 times:

Another YMX/YUL debate.

If YUL was closed, who would pay for the new highways, the high-speed train, the new runways and terminals that would be needed to accomodate the traffic.. wake up



User currently offlineTcfc424 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2108 times:

Why doesn't someone utilize the possibilities this property has and turn it into a convention center/corporate retreat property? Companies could hold their annual or quarterly conventions here, flyinga chartered aircraft straight in without having to concern themselves with security...It has a hotel on site, facilities for catering, room for providing entertainment...Seems perfect for the hunter as well...

If anyone wants more ideas along this thought process, email me...I am a marketing major and always looking for interesting and unique projects.

Mike S in AUS


User currently offlineYULtoPEI From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2042 times:

I totally agree with you Qb001.
I was lived couple of year at St-Janvier (mirabel) and you said : From Montreal to YMX now, it's an almost uninterrupted chain of houses and industries... Exactly. Couple of year before, the high density housing stopping around Boisbriand - St. Therese, but now is completely around YMX.

I don't understand why ADM don't use YUL for only regional and USA routes... Like YUL-YYZ, YUL-YQB, etc...
and YMX for all international route....
I like two both but I think close completely YMX of passager flight is bad idea...
maybe is because my first 2-3 flights in my life was in YMX. And it's all beautiful memory.

Regards... espacially to Qb001 and all of you writing in this threat.



PEI in Colombia!!!. [Canon T2i]
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A Second Airport For Seattle? posted Sun Aug 27 2006 21:53:24 by Dsa
Is Second Airport For Atlanta Possible? posted Wed Jul 19 2006 13:33:23 by 747Lord
New Airport For The Mayan Riviera (CUN Area)! posted Sat Jun 3 2006 07:31:21 by SFOMEX
An Airport For Just 900 Passengers?! posted Wed May 10 2006 23:40:18 by Mozart
Kennedy Space Center - Runway For Rent posted Wed Mar 15 2006 23:08:11 by Desh
On The News: New Airport For NYC? posted Tue Feb 14 2006 08:36:12 by Rampart
New Int'l Airport For Valencia, Venezuela? posted Sat Jan 7 2006 19:23:28 by B757200
Possible Airport For West Cumbria, UK posted Wed Jan 4 2006 14:44:51 by CKT789
30 Minutes In Munich Airport For Transfer? posted Wed Nov 16 2005 12:45:03 by Parisien
New Airport For PFN Update posted Tue Oct 11 2005 23:33:25 by KarlB737