Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No EK At NRT?  
User currently offlineND From Belgium, joined Feb 2004, 280 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

I've always read posts from board members here saying how slots at NRT are valuable and prestigious and yesterday I was analyzing the EK route map only to find NRT not be one of the destinations. Why is this? Is it because they've simply been unable to get a slot?

Also, how hard is it to obtain a slot at NRT relative to getting slots at LHR?

[Edited 2004-04-09 15:08:06]

[Edited 2004-04-09 15:08:44]

ND - Hated By Many, Confronted By None
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBa319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8743 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3093 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This is a good question,especially since EK has just added a 4th daily LHR flight.

Having visited NRT on spotting trips twice in the last 12 months or so,there are several 'dead' spots where nothing is going in,i'm sure EK could 'squeeze' a flight in,unless the slot times are not good for their onward connections?

User currently offlineND From Belgium, joined Feb 2004, 280 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2983 times:


I don't know if bumping is allowed, but I would really love if this question would be answered instead of me reposting!

ND - Hated By Many, Confronted By None
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 5354 posts, RR: 47
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

Slots at NRT fetch a very high premium price and are very very difficult to obtain. If EK had managed to purchase NRT slots in the mid 1990s (95-98 timeframe), then we would have seen them flying there now instead of KIX.

However as things now go, KIX was an easier slot to obtain than NRT and make no mistake about it, NRT was always going to be the first choice but somehow due to slot constraints it wasnt meant to be.

In anycase EK codeshare with ANA on the KIX-NRT-KIX route so it aint all that bad.

If you look around, I dont recall any new carrier introducing NRT flights since 2000...many have increased frequency but I cant recall any new entrant since 2000 at NRT!!!

User currently offlineDiesel33 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 329 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

I believe that EK codeshares on the KIX-HND-KIX routing and not the NRT one advised.


User currently offlineND From Belgium, joined Feb 2004, 280 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2863 times:

You guys mention the money issue, but I don't see that as a problem for EK considering the fact that they've ordered 46 A380s! Airlines are grabbing each other's throats for slots at Heathrow (heck, even Gordon Bethune whined about it) and somehow Emirates manages to get slots so easily. I'm just trying to figure out how they've had such "bad luck" with NRT.

ND - Hated By Many, Confronted By None
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 29179 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2836 times:

Slots are extremely valuable at NRT. Several new slots were made available just recently with the opening of the 7100ft 16L/34R runway. Unfortunately the shortness of this runways has limited it to mostly arrival traffic and smaller/lighter aircraft operating on short hops within Asia, not long range intercontinental flights.

In addition the availability of commercially advantages slots can be even more difficult to get than simply getting a slot allocated. I;m aware of a recent three way slot trade between airlines to allow one carrier to operate some semblance of a regular schedule. The slots they were originally allocated were a mix and match of slots thru out the day which obviously does not work from an efficient marketing and aircraft scheduling vantage.

From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2774 times:

In anycase EK codeshare with ANA

JAL, not ANA

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No AZ At IAD? posted Wed Nov 1 2006 03:45:28 by Mk777
Why No WN At LGB? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 18:02:18 by 28L28L
Why No Engines At The Front? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 04:23:17 by GAIsweetGAI
Why No Props At ORD? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 08:16:38 by FlyingNanook
LAN Airlines: Why No Pics At Heathrow In Database posted Sun Sep 10 2006 12:28:18 by BA787
Why No Expansion At Stewart? (NY) posted Sat Jul 15 2006 05:12:16 by EmSeeEye
Why No B6 At ISP? posted Thu Jun 29 2006 16:57:12 by Emseeeye
Why No 757's At Sydney? posted Tue Jun 20 2006 04:19:21 by Final47
Why No FL At BNA posted Wed Jun 7 2006 23:21:32 by AirBerlin
Why No EK DXB-AMS? posted Sun Nov 27 2005 00:32:27 by LxLucien