Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TWA And The 741 Relationship  
User currently offlineMD11LuxuryLinr From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1385 posts, RR: 14
Posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3217 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jordi Grife - IBERIAN SPOTTERS


Before the flight 800 accident, TWA was starting to repaint their 741s and it seemed like they were planning to hang on to them for at least a few more years. From what I remember, TWA quickly retired the aging 741 fleet after the accident. If flight 800 never crashed, and TWA was still around in full form, would they still have the 741?


Caution wake turbulence, you are following a heavy jet.
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRthrbeflying86 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 243 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3203 times:

I don't know...if you look around this site there are very few left (passenger, at least). Not even Northwest has them  Smile.


I'd rather be flying.
User currently offlineAir1727 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3194 times:

Most likely, no. Even before flight 800, the 747s were already on a tentative retirement schedule. Reducing the fleet age was one of the number one priorities in planning as far back as 1997.

User currently offlineJOSS21 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3176 times:

I would think that they would invest in a newer more cost effective product. They were getting a lot of heat (mostly press generated) about their aging fleet.

User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 35
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3169 times:

Ryan,
I too have noticed this. The only reasoning that I can come up with is the fact that the aircraft were due to be repainted and were to remain in the fleet a few years after doing so, however the TWA 800 incident somewhat accelerated their retirement from the fleet. Looking through the photos, there were only a handful of the -100 fleet that received the new colors. Most were reitred out in the stripe scheme.



Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3145 times:

For some reason, TW painted just 1 741 and 1 L10 in the new scheme, both fairly shortly before retirement.

I always thought it was a PR exercise.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineMD11LuxuryLinr From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1385 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3139 times:

.."They were getting a lot of heat (mostly press generated) about their aging fleet."...

That was one detail that just about every news organization made sure they 'shared' in every report about flt 800 right after it happened. The plane was only, what, 24 or 25 years old at the time of the accident? Aging? Yes.. Old? Not to people who know better, like the smarter aviation enthusiasts.  Big grin



Caution wake turbulence, you are following a heavy jet.
User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 35
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3124 times:

Pity that everyone doesn't understand that though Ryan. I'll take a 1970's vintage 727 over a brand spanking new 737-800 any day of the week and if that 727 is properly maintained it's just as safe or if not safer than that -800. Old, smoky, and loud---that's the way it should be in my humble opinion. Shows how the media really has an effect on things---inaccurate portrayals (in regards to an aircrafts age) if you want my opinion.


Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineMD11LuxuryLinr From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1385 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3094 times:

.."Old, smoky, and loud---that's the way it should be in my humble opinion"...

 Laugh out loud

Hey Bryan.. So when is your next trip? Hopefully, it's on a NW DC9!!  Big grin



Caution wake turbulence, you are following a heavy jet.
User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 35
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3091 times:

Actually,
My next trip is in June and I'm throwing around the idea of flying HP PHL-LAS-PHX-SAN A319 *737-200* 757-200. Not many of the old stogie-bearers flying around anymore much to my chagrin.



Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3034 times:

TWA was actually planning to expand flights from JFK to Europe and add capacity (using more 747-100's) some of which were to be leased back from Tower Air.

The strategy was abandoned following TWA 800.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3389 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2938 times:

The whole problem with the media these days. They tell half the story, and from then on the majoritity of the public will believe that side and nothing but that side.

Example being the media going on and on about AC employees refusing to take cuts to save the airline while not saying a word about the management getting their millions which they dont deserve, which is making the employees look bad when all they are doing is standing their ground while the management tries to knock them down... Another Example is one old plane crashes and media makes it sound like all old planes are unsafe when really with the proper maintenance and a well trained crew a 20 year old slab of smoking metal can be just as good as what a brand new hunk of plastic will ever be...


CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineDETA737 From Portugal, joined Oct 2000, 612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2910 times:

In May of 1995 TWA put out a proxy statement that covered their fleet plans until the end of 1997. Plans were to have 11 747s by the end of 1995, 9 by the end of 1996 and 8 by December of 1997. So their fleet was supposed to consist of 8 747s, 26 767s, 90 MD-80s, 32 727s and 58 DC-9s. At the beginning of 1996, the plans were revised. The 747 fleet was to consist of 13 747s by 1999. The two with the most cycles on them were to be retired and three used 742s were to be added. Also the 757s were arriving in 1997 with 15 in the fleet by year's end.

Finally on July 2, 1996 TWA said they would be leasing two 747-100s and one MD-83. Also the airline purchased one 747-200 and signed a letter of intent for a second. This was just before the crash of flight 800. At that time TWA seemed to be turning around. The STL hub was profitable the airline actually managed to make a profit the second quarter. At that time TWA still had a decent transatlantic schedule with flights to Athens, Barcelona, Cairo, Frankfurt, Lisbon, Madrid, Milan, Paris, Rome and Tel Aviv from JFK and London and Paris to St. Louis. Following the crash of flight 900 the 747s were retired by February of 1997 and Athens and Frankfurt were dropped.


Here's TWA's 747s at the time of flight 900 (July 19, 1996)

747-131s (originally delivered to TWA in 1970 and 1971) *= flight 900
N53110, N53116, N93104, N93107, N93108, N93109, N93119*

747-143 (ex Alitalia)
N128TW (leased from July of 1996 until September)

747-156 (ex Iberia acquired in 1980)
N133TW, N134TW

747-238 (ex Qantas leased in May of 1996)
N307TW

747-257B (ex Swissair)
N303TW

747-284B (ex Olympic Airways)
N305TW

The 747 disposed of before the crash of flight 900 was an ex-KLM 747-206B (N307TW). N93104 and N93105 were also supposed to leave the fleet by year's end.


User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7456 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2778 times:

I didn't even know TWA painted thier 741's in new colors . I did , however , see the 1 L1011 that was painted in new colors in storage in LAS in '99 and then again in GSO in 2002. Probably beer cans by now  Sad.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3507 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2621 times:

I herd that TWA was looking to starting a STL-NRT route before flight 800. They was going to use 747 200 on this route. Some of these 747 200 was going to replace the 747 100 in there fleet. There was also a plan to replace there 747's and L1011's with A330's but that fell though before flight 800.

User currently offlineNomadic From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 425 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2574 times:

Re: 747400sp

Acording to the TWA employee hotline at the time, the Company had been awarded the STL-NRT route and was looking at starting up sometime in 1997.

They also had A330's on order for quite some time but this was re-negotiated and replaced by a large order for 318s, which of course they were never able to take delivery.


User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3507 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2438 times:

Nomadic

Thank you for the information. I did not know they was awarded the route. It would have been interesting to see how that service turn out.


User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6531 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2412 times:

TWA was going to operate STL-NRT with a 767-200ER in an all (or nearly so) Trans World One configuration.


Steve/MSY


User currently offlineDETA737 From Portugal, joined Oct 2000, 612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2371 times:

TWA applied for service to Japan on March 1, 1996. They applied for daily flights from St. Louis to Tokyo and 3 weekly flights from St. Louis to Osaka. The flights were to be flown with 747-200s. TWA finally recieved the route authority in 1998 though they could not get any landing slots at Narita making the route authority pointless. The service was supposed to be started with 767-200ERs that TWA was supposed to acquire. However, the service was then postponed and was supposed to be inaugurated no later than June 1, 1999. This deadline passed and TWA never ended up serving Tokyo.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
TWA And The A-330s? posted Wed Jul 16 2003 20:57:54 by M.Seles_Fan
TWA And The 777 posted Sun Sep 8 2002 17:06:01 by JFKTOWERFAN
Status With TWA And The Merger? posted Thu Nov 22 2001 04:08:10 by SJCguy
TWA And The 717 posted Tue Mar 7 2000 20:30:47 by Matt D
TWA And The Youngest Fleet posted Sun Feb 6 2000 03:12:40 by DC-9-10
TWA And The 717? posted Thu Feb 3 2000 04:49:23 by Stlbham
TWA And The Best Merger Partner. posted Thu Oct 21 1999 21:56:42 by Markdc10
TWA And The A-318 posted Tue Aug 24 1999 18:13:35 by AirT85
TWA And ATL In The Mid 90's posted Wed Jun 16 2004 18:59:10 by Jerion
Why Did Twa Sell To Aa? And The Twa Story? posted Sat Feb 7 2004 22:57:23 by Bmi330