Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Asiana Vs Korean And All Nippon Vs Japan Airlines  
User currently offlineMusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1090 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 7451 times:

Hello all,

can anyone compare the services of these airlines respectively?
I noticed each company offers a lot of flights from HKG to korea and japan respectively.

do you have any insight on services provided onboard these airlines, and the fleet they using?

cheers


Lufthansa Group of Airlines
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCXCPA From Hong Kong, joined May 2000, 387 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 7346 times:

Forget Asiana and Korean Air if you do not want to travel during mid-night. Both airlines offers two flights from HKG to ICN (one of the two flights take off at mid-night, the remaining flight takes off around noon) each day respectively.
However, I would prefer Asiana because of pretty flight attendant.  Love

If you go to Japan, both airlines are much similiar, however the fleet of ANA is much better, because ANA may use their 777 to HKG route, JAL never use 777 to HKG, sometimes may use the very old 747 and DC-10.  Sad


User currently offlineCessna172RG From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 7315 times:

Personally, I like ANA better. Better service, and the flight attendants have always been a dream. But, ANA and JAL are pretty similar to eachother. The both operate the 747-400D, the 777-300, the 777-200, tons of 767s, JAL has lots of 737-400s, ANA (and ANK) has lots of 737-500s and two 737-400s used for quick island hopping flights out of Tokyo and Fukuoka. ANA does fly the A320 and A321. JAL just merged with JAS, and now they have MD-80s, MD-87s, MD-90s, and A300s.

If you want fleet variety, pick one. Depends on your fancy. If you like classic 747s, fly JAL out of YVR or HNL. If you like 777s and want Star Alliance points, fly ANA. If you want to fly on a supercharged 747 for only about an hour, fly from Haneda to Itami in a 747-400D on either airline.

Everything in Japan is service oriented. The flight attendants will do their best, as opposed to US FA's who seem to do the bare minimum. Try JAL once and ANA once for yourself. You will either think that they are both pretty gosh darned similar, or that you like one over the other. Either way, you get more service in coach on either carrier over anything that is currently flying stateside.



Save the whales...for dinner!!!
User currently offlineMusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 7237 times:

thanks a lot everyone

i am just trying to get more details since i dont want to stick with CX all the time. I dont really like CX that miuch personally.

Thanks again



Lufthansa Group of Airlines
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Korean Air Expands Codeshare With Japan Airlines posted Tue Jun 21 2005 08:23:25 by Kalsky
Keen To Know: Asiana Airlines Vs. Korean Air posted Wed Jun 22 2005 10:48:01 by Smeagol
Asiana Vs Korean posted Sat Dec 28 2002 08:52:01 by BOEING747400
Asiana VS. Korean Air posted Fri Feb 2 2001 23:42:33 by Erela
787 Vs 767 And 757 posted Sat Nov 4 2006 23:20:19 by EBJ1248650
Old School Vs. New School Airlines posted Fri Oct 7 2005 20:54:12 by Grantcv
Boeing And Japan Airlines Complete 787 And 737 Agr posted Tue May 10 2005 02:42:25 by USAF336TFS
All Nippon Airways And LHR posted Thu Sep 16 2004 21:26:32 by Mxp
All Nippon Airlines Eliminating Japanese Titles? posted Fri Jun 4 2004 21:46:26 by TranStar
Boeing And Japan AirLines Celebrate 150th Widebody posted Thu May 8 2003 07:12:37 by United777