DaV From Italy, joined Jun 2001, 669 posts, RR: 9 Posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 9467 times:
Sorry to ask a probably dumb question, but I was looking at some pics in the db of cargo planes and noted that a good amount of them are shoot in Anchorage. So why so many cargos in Alaska? What's so important there to even base a cargo carrier (Polar Air Cargo)?
Iowa744fan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 931 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 9316 times:
First, from what I have learned, there are some people who get annoyed at questions that they think are "dumb", but my opinion is don't worry. If you have a question and are curious about it, that is what a forum is for. So, I say, don't worry if you think the question is "dumb". Just ask away.
Now, to the question, as mentioned by AFC_ajaz00, Anchorage is a very convenient fueling stop. Often, the weight of the cargo is much higher than the weight of say passengers (obvious differences such as flowers and textiles, versus some heavier machinery, etc.) Anyway, the aircraft could operate a segment, say New York - Hong Kong nonstop, but weight from fuel would account for a significant proportion of the MTOW (max. take off weight), and the airline would have to limit the amount of cargo that it can carry (again, the density of the cargo plays a role). This is the same for passenger flights on extreme long haul flights. Because the amount of cargo carried is what determines revenue, most airlines would rather fly a fully loaded aircraft and make a stop in say Anchorage to refuel. The cost of landing, refueling, and taking off again is generally more than made up for in the additional revenue from operating a full flight.
Another benefit to some carriers is the ability to use Anchorage as a sorting hub for flights in each direction. Fed Ex, UPS, and Northwest all have large facilities up there for doing this. This similar to a hub facility for passengers and imrpoves efficiency. To my knowledge, the Asian airlines tend to just land, refuel, and take off. They generally only operate from one city at one end (i.e. Cathay Pacific Cargo flights come from only Hong Kong and go to several U.S. cities, hence no need to transfer cargo. Northwest flights come from several U.S. cities and go to several Asian cities, so there is some need to transfer cargo). At the moment, I don't know of any Asian airlines that transfer cargo in ANC. When I was there, they just pulled up and parked in the space between the two terminals, refueled, changed crews, and were off again. It is quite impressive if you can hit a busy time for them. Quite a few 744Fs of the Asian cargo carriers there and up close to see.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8148 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 9230 times:
ANC is not only an important refuelling stop for transpacific air cargo flights, but also NW's very profitable air cargo subsidiary is based there, too! However, that could change once more and more A380-800F's become operational, as unlike the 747 freighters the A388F has the range with a near-full cargo load to fly from the US West Coast directly to Japan (and possibly PEK/PVG) non-stop easily.
Mizzou65201 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 8920 times:
It's the "great circle" at work. It's a whole lot faster to circle the earth up at the top than 'round the middle. Thus you get polar routes from Europe and trans-pacific routes between Asia and the US that are much shorter with a northern leg than "straight across."
Add a major inter modal location in ANC (air-sea-road) and you've got yourself a prime cargo hub.