DfwneedsQF From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 59 posts, RR: 0 Posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4255 times:
Well I enjoy the polished quality of the plane but could they expand on it and maybe change it up a bit. I would love to see the ideas for a new livery or maybe more specialty liveries like America West does.
DfwneedsQF From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 59 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4207 times:
Well maybe AA could spice things up and add some more specialty liveries. I mean delta looks interesting because of all the different liveries ,but AA only has te normal and the retro which maybe they could incorporate into more planes. As long as its not the 777 in retro its fine with me.
Ckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 4923 posts, RR: 1 Reply 7, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4143 times:
AA is not big on dramatic changes. The pilot uniforms got a makeover in the mid 1990s. They went from a dark postman blue to navy blue. Unless you flew AA regularly, you probably wouldn't notice.
That said, AA will probably freshen the livery within the next few years. AA's current livery came out in 1969. In that time period, UA has made 3 major revisions. DL has made 3 or 4. NW has made 3. CO has made 2. TW made 2. Even F9, WN, NK, and HP have had one livery change each.
My guess is that AA will go back to 1950s-style font for the lettering, and the logo will have a less-stylized eagle.
Delta767300ER From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2562 posts, RR: 12 Reply 10, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3944 times:
I personally like AA's livery. It sure shines in the sun! It would take me a long time to get used to another livery. I was bearly getting adjusted to Delta's 1997 scheme when they started with the Wavy Gravy scheme.
Goingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 18 Reply 11, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3909 times:
You "let's change the livery lovers" do realize that when that happens, they don't just paint the planes but have to replace stationary, business cards, signage at airports, replace billboards and a myriad of other expensive things when the livery is changed...don't you? Not a real wise idea for a company on the edge of bankruptcy to be doing.
Skyguy From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 467 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3779 times:
There is an economic reason why AA have not updated their livery. Apart from the fact that when the present livery was introduced they wanted it to look 'timeless', there is reason for that polished metallic look.
Painting an aircraft adds several hundread lbs of weight to an aircrafts frame, this all adds up if you think about the number of flights and take-off/landing cycles a typical aircraft goes through in a year. This is extra weight that has to be carried for which fuel has to be expended. Now, given that the extra cost of fuel expended in carrying this extra hundred pounds of weight is small, multiply that amount per aircraft times take-off/landing cycles in year times number of aircraft in AA's fleet - it all begins to add up. AA have been particularly picky about weight management of its empty aircraft, they want to make it as low as possible so that fuel costs are made as efficient as possible. Robert Crandall, the authoratarian CEO of AA and predecessor to Don Carty (before he resigned last year) was a fanatic where this was concerned and once even banned steel coffee spoons used for on board, saying that it was extra weight being carted around and an item with minimum utility. His legacy still remains at AA and current management are still obsessed at cutting not only costs but weight management as well of an aircraft to minimize repetetive fuel costs.
This may sound kind of far fetched but I read about this about 10 years ago in AA's own press literature, so its straight from the horses' mouth.
SO, having said that, despite the costs of changing livery which is significant but not prohibitive, if they do change at all, it will be for another polished metal look. In which case its going to be something that changes the font or colors etc. etc. but nothing more dramatic than that. I doubt that we will see fully painted AA aircraft, though some of their aircraft are painted grey because of the material the aircraft is made off does not lend to the bare metal look.
"Those who talk, do not know, and those who know, do not talk."
Goingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 18 Reply 16, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3722 times:
Actually, while no paint does result in weight savings (Eastern went to bare metal for just this reason), Southwest found with their "Silver One" aircraft that the bare metal required them to keep it out of service longer than the other aircraft in the fleet because they had to polish it to keep it looking good. So they painted it what they call "silver", but I call "battleship gray".
DeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 36 Reply 19, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3527 times:
First off Curt,
I've refrained from making any such comments in the past regarding people's interest on the subject of AA and a new livery. Something can only be discussed so much before there is nothing else to say about it and it's all redundant. I have nothing against your AA fantasy liveries, and quite frankly I enjoyed looking at them. However, the question of whether AA needs a new livery is getting old--as per the par with NW DC-9's etc. et alii
I have not in any way condemned any one person for asking this question and everyone is within their means to ask. However, I think that it's been established many times as to why has not changed their current livery and quite frankly from where I sit it doesn't warrant any more discussion. A simple search of the civil aviation forums would provide a myriad of threads discussing this same thing.
I don't think that what myself and my cohorts are saying here is that it's not out of the question to come up with fantasy liveries and show them to everyone. But when you have people going: "When will AA change it's livery? Why haven't they done so already" it gets old after a while. We're beating a dead horse here. The threads on this topic all say the same thing and it's a waste of valuable bandwidth. Quite frankly I think that it's very crass of you to tell us to just ignore what we don't like. If something bothers you, you should speak out about it-not ignore it. So this topic has reached the point where it is "ne plus ultra" so to speak and no more needs to be said about it.
[Edited 2004-04-17 21:22:26]
Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Schweizair From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 139 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (9 years 8 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3477 times:
I like AA's livery but wish they would use something for special occasions. Southwest's Lone Star One and Shamu are nice examples. AA could do something similar. On the other hand, it probably helps save money because they don't need much paint for a new plane. Does anybody know how much more it would cost for AA to paint a plane completely in one color?
Concord977 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1261 posts, RR: 28 Reply 21, posted (9 years 8 months 20 hours ago) and read 3365 times:
Not to dwell . . . BUT:
My irritation comes more from some of the hostile emails I have received, moreso than the comments in this thread. I have received comments such as: "were you drunk when you drew this?" or "the only thing this scheme needs is a tomahawk to be complete" or "so-and-so's drawings are so much better than yours", etc.
I am not too concerned whether people like my drawings or anyone else's. But I just cannot believe how negative, arrogant and condescending people can be in this forum.
The bottom line is that you saw the title of the thread before CHOOSING to enter the thread. Then, you made it your point to enter the thread for the purpose of being negative and letting people who AREN'T tired of talkling about this subject know that you ARE tired of it.
Most of us are not here to save lives. But I guess that you are. I've been searching for that life-and-death forum of yours but I haven't found it yet.
Diamond From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3279 posts, RR: 64 Reply 22, posted (9 years 8 months 20 hours ago) and read 3336 times:
Concord is right. You are being an idiot. He nailed it when he called your group cynical.
I've noticed that you initiated each of the topics below. I wonder if any of those were ever talked about before. I wonder if each of these are really important enough to be here.
Why copy a news story off the internet and regurgitate it on here? The front page of this website already has a news area.
America West Reports Record Traffic For February
PHL Spotters - Meet On The 21st Of March!
Swiss A330's -- What's Going On With Them?
Liveries That Change Looks In Different Light
Jan Zurakowski Canadian Aviation Legend Dies At 89
Kudos To United Airlines - You've Won Me Over!
Flying Out Of PHL On Christmas Eve; High Loads?
TSA Luggage Searches - Guidelines?
Help With Aircraft Reg#'s From Previous Flights
What Aircraft Type Have You Flown Most This Year?
Heathrow A-Z On Discovery Wings Tonight
Caravelle On Discovery Wings Tonight
Remember AA 587
Airliner Into Knxx (NAS JRB Willow Grove)-What?
Song Doing Better Than Forecasted-more Planes
Airports Not Named For Anyone/thing - Ideas?
Boeing 737-100 - Who Still Operates Them?
Spotting At SAN On 7/29-JOIN US!
Bringing Back The Old Times-What Do You Want Most?
Airline Review Magazine; What Do You Think?
I'm Flying Swiss This Summer, Need Feedback
America West A318's-What's The Deal?
Usps Charter Two 747's; Mail Troops
The War Against Spotters-New Level (Arrest)
Airline Review Feb 2003 Issue
Aviation Literature-Reviews, Comments, Must Reads!
CRJ Flight Attendants
Comairs Last EMB-120's
What To Expect In Cvg?
Americans F-100 56 Seats
Flying On Comair, What Could I Expect?
National Retired Their SunKing And Another Appears
American And Their New Interiors
The Death Of Sky Train, Another Glitch
The SunJet International Legacy
United Airlines New Look? Interiors?
How Much Longer Is The DC-9 Going To Be Used?
The End Of MetroJet?
Continental DC-9's Live On!
The Airtran 717-200 Experience
TV Censorship Gone Too Far?
Good With Computers? I Need Some Help!
Someone With Web-design Experience Needed
Good With Computers? I Need Help With Problem!
Forum Idea- E-mail Thread Replies
Anyone Here A Naval Vetran?
Apollo 13- Houston, We Have A Problem
Hotel Stuff Wanted!
Anyone Been To Branson?
DeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 36 Reply 23, posted (9 years 8 months 4 hours ago) and read 3230 times:
I'd rather not continue this discussion, but I have to get a few closing comments in here. Half of those topics you posted above I never initiated so you better take a second look. Moreover, out of the ones that I did, only 3 are based upon news articles and they brought about good hearty discussions. I'd like you to share your comments with everyone on here that makes a post around a news story, I'm sure that they would appreciate that notion. I also like how you're reverted to the childish art of namecalling--you're such a fartknocker So before you make a poor attempt at reaming someone out, make sure you have yourself and your facts in order.
Now that I've gotten that straightened up, Curt:
Nobody deserves the aforementioned e-mails that you received above. You're perfectly within your means to come up with fantasy liveries and show them to the aviation community. As I remember it, the threads concerning your livieries had a lot of good comments/suggestions/kudos, what have you. And please understand that in no way am I condemning that. What we are saying is that people are habitually asking the same questions and the threads are nothing but the same old answers and assertions. It's getting to be an old regime.
That's all I have to say on the subject. The defense rests.
Edit: Oh and from now on I think that on my part I'm going to make better use of the Suggest Deletion feature when a topic comes up that has been discussed to death. A small oversight on my part from the get-go. And upon further research on my end it lists me as the thread started for some of those topics above but I never started those threads---the AA F100 56 seat thread stood out when I first saw that. I didn't even know AA operated 56 seat F-100's up until a week or two ago when someone made a post about them. And I certainly never posted anything on the civil aviation forum about u-boats. Just a few examples, but there are more like that in that list. Must be a glitch in the forum software.
[Edited 2004-04-18 18:16:39]
Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Airtran737 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3662 posts, RR: 13 Reply 24, posted (9 years 8 months 4 hours ago) and read 3199 times:
I swear this topic is brought up almost as much as "When will NW retire their DC-9's?" and "Which is better, Airbus or Boeing?" and "When will NW retire their DC-9's" Did I mention that one already? Well in the five seconds it took me to type it, I'm sure at least two people asked "When is NW going to retire their DC-9's?"
Nice Trip Report!!! Great Pics, thanks for posting!!!! B747Forever