Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Next Airbus?  
User currently offlineA380900 From France, joined Dec 2003, 1116 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2677 times:

What's the next step for Airbus?

Counter the 7E7?
Start building smaller jets (like Embraer)?
A330 NG?
Any other idea?

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUA2162 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 496 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2640 times:

The triple-decker A390ER! Complete with a gym and 200 seat movie theater! Big grin

User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8142 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2584 times:

It'll definitely be a 7E7 equivalent. Something that is long overdue - a 767 / A300 / A310 replacement. It'll sell like hotcakes, the biggest sector in the market probably. They had a half-hearted stab at it a while back, an A330 with an A300-600R wing. Didn't grab people's interest. When they get around to it, this new plane might be the A329, that's what they're looking at, a smaller and lighter A330. No need for an A300NG, the current version is still young and cutting edge.


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3221 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2498 times:

As well as looking at an NG wide-body twin to counter the 7E7 and replace the A310, 762, A300, 763, A332 - with an A3XX-300 and 200 series with ER options - they're going to need to look at an NG A320 before too long. One with composites and lighter weight materials as well as new engines and so forth because Embraer might beat both Boeing and them to it if they're not careful.

IMHO
MH



come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

I don´t see that Airbus will build smaller jets and compete with Embraer and Bombardier. They should concentrate on the A380, perhaps A380SR and so
on, since I still think A and B civilian aircraft will be one company in the future
and the natural choice will be the B7E7 for that size of aircraft.


User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

Cedarjet, actually, I think the A330 with the wing of the A300-600R was the version that some airlines wanted, but Airbus wanted to keep the A330 wing on the proposed A330-500 - the main downside to that being that the aircraft would have to (continue to) use the same gates as for B747/B777/A340 operations - and the airlines wanted something that could use the gates that were used for B767/A300s at the airports. Airbus wanted to offer the aircraft as a shortened A330-200 which, through software, could have it's engines either rated at a lower or higher thrust, thus making the airplane either a medium-haul or long-haul plane... but that was something that the airlines simply didn't want (at least not with the same wing on it).

For that much, I'll agree with the general sentiment here that they'll, most likely, concentrate on something to counter the B7E7, followed by a new generation A320.

Regards,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 854 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2343 times:

OMG........not another war!!!!!!!
Jeeeeeehhhhhh  Nuts

Michael//SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineJet-lagged From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 874 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2248 times:

A twin engine 340! And then, a twin engine 380!!

User currently offlineRoberta From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2027 times:

Well considring the A300 has exactly the same dimensions as the 7E7 i think it is fairly obvious what will happen. They might as well upgrade the A310 while they're at it

User currently offlineQb001 From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2053 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1950 times:

I dream of a 310NG (new wings, new avionics, new engines, FBW). That would rock...


Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory.
User currently offlineRoberta From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1862 times:

i also dream of that Qb001

i think we are the only two though

anyone else?


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 984 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1764 times:

OMG........not another war!!!!!!!

No one is starting a war. Do you have to piss your pants every time someone says Airbus and Boeing in the same sentence?

anyone else?

Put me down. I doubt anything could be carried over from the A310 line, but a simmilar sized aircraft would go over well with me. I think Airbus would do well by overhauling the A330 line (A350 for the heck of it) with new systems, materials, aerodyamics ext. and offer the following-

A350-200- update of the A332 with 8000nm range
A350-300- update of the A333 with 7000nm range
A350-400- stretch A333 with 7500nm range, 350 pax capacity (A340-600 replacement)

It would be almost impossible to configure a short-range/shrink version from this without starting from scratch. I don't think Airbus is in the position to spend massive amounts on an A330 update, so maybe a solution would be to update the A330 followed by a strong A320 replacement to fill the gap.


User currently offlineAzmd80 From Italy, joined Nov 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1675 times:

A305: a low cost enhanced A310 with new wing, cockpit and engine, that can fille the gap between A321 and A 330 200: it coud be used on ahort high density route and from long low density (as trans pacific or asiatic) to replace all old 767 300 and 310, with high commonality with 330 and 340.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Next Airbus? posted Sun Apr 18 2004 04:35:58 by A380900
Next Airbus... posted Mon Mar 8 2004 05:05:10 by Francoflier
Airbus 380 To Get Approval Next Tueday posted Wed Dec 6 2006 17:37:18 by LHStarAlliance
Is Airbus The Next Enron? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 05:57:44 by Tangowhisky
What Will Come Next For Airbus? posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:07:28 by JamesJimlb
Airbus A380 Who's Next To Jump Onboard? posted Sat Sep 2 2006 13:34:11 by WINGS
BAE To Force Airbus Buyout Process Next Week? posted Sat Jun 3 2006 05:57:28 by NAV20
What Is The Next Major Program From Airbus? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 17:30:49 by Grantcv
Airbus A380 Next MSN Flight posted Fri Sep 30 2005 20:49:50 by AirworldA320
Airbus' Next Step posted Wed Apr 27 2005 23:20:17 by Moose1226