Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airline Between LCC And Regular  
User currently offlineNudelhirsch From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 1438 posts, RR: 19
Posted (10 years 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2018 times:

Hi,

do You see a market for airlines who offer a mixture between LCC and regular carrier? Like offering meal plans for acceptable price on prebooking, offering good service, still operating minor and even sometimes important airports?

As here in Europe a battle started about domestic flights (LCC are about to win) and holiday-routes (LH stepping into FRA-PMI) or so, I think LCC are a part of the market, which have a stable position by now.

Oppinions?

cheers.....




Putana da Seatbeltz!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2007 times:

We had something like that here in the states pre-9/11. It's called Midwest Express and after 9/11 they changed their operations around along many of their routes to be more like the traditional LCCs. They even changed their name: Now called Midwest Airlines. That was a mistake, but I don't think many realize it yet.


Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineWmupilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 1473 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 1985 times:

ATA - Higher quality LCC. Business Class, Prereserved Seats, Onboard Food, Frequent Flier, Newer Aircraft, and IFE.

The same could be said for AirTran, Frontier, Jet Blue. I concider these airlines to be a higher quality of LCC.

Southwest would be the bottom line Low Cost Carrier. No prereserved seats, No Food, No IFE, mix of older and newer aircraft, they do have a very popular frequent flier program though. Otherwise that's about it.



JetBlue - Bringing humanity back to air travel
User currently onlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4880 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

Well put Elwood.

I'm surprised Midwest didn't reconfigure the entire fleet, say 40% premium and 60% economy or "saver" as they phrase it. Keep enough 4x4 biz class seats to maintain the very loyal customer base they have, albeit at reduced levels now.

That would have saved the headache of running two operations with two different fleets, and they might have maintained a yield premium. Remember Midway 1? They bought the remains of Air Florida and ran that as Midway Express to Florida, and ran Midway Metolink (biz class) service everywhere else. That sure didn't last long. Not to mention the more recent endeavors at United, US Airways, Delta and Continental.

Better two types of service in all aircraft than the split fleet scenario, especially for an airline of Midwest's size.




Next Up: STL-TPA-BWI-PWM-BWI-STL
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LCC Between Brussels And Madrid? posted Thu Apr 20 2006 03:03:08 by Checo77
LCC Airlines Between Paris And Rome posted Thu Aug 26 2004 16:37:06 by Soups
Looking For A LCC Link Between AMS And Berlin posted Tue Feb 24 2004 02:52:56 by LHMark
Diffs Between Manufacturer And Airline Manual? posted Thu Dec 4 2003 19:41:04 by Jgore
Airline Route Between SNA And SAN posted Mon Mar 12 2001 18:36:07 by UsAirways_757
Resumption Of Flights Between Gibraltar And Spain posted Thu Dec 14 2006 16:50:02 by Columbia107
Comparisons Between 346 And 773ER posted Fri Dec 1 2006 12:15:16 by BOEING747400
Comparisons Between 345 And 772LR posted Fri Dec 1 2006 12:12:10 by BOEING747400
Crazy Low Fares Between India And The UK posted Fri Nov 10 2006 11:06:10 by TheDiplomat
SQ Service Between MXP And BCN posted Mon Nov 6 2006 23:57:27 by RetroLivery