Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CN-235: What Was Wrong With It?  
User currently offlineLVZXV From Gabon, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 31
Posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3590 times:

Since only about a dozen of these funny looking machines ever flew commercially, what in particular made this plane inferior to say the ATR-42, Dash 8 and Fokker 50?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Remi Dallot


How do you say "12 months" in Estonian?
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBlueairbureau From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 69 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3561 times:

The problem ranges from range to speed to purpose. The cn-235 was designed primarily as a military cargo transport with the ability to transport troops. A search of it's history will reveal it is great in this role. If you look at the rear of the aircraft you can see the tell tale signs of this. All the tail feathers are raised to allow a rear cargo door as needed. Because of it's original intention as a military transport certain aspects of performance were considered sacrificeable. Speed was the big hit. It's slow compared to most of the other aircraft in the 40-50 seat range. Looking at Jane's books you loose about 30-40 knots in cruise. Range also seems to be a problem. The more you load it up with weight the shorter it's range. It's because the wing is designed to get good loads out of unprepared (rough)fields for a prescribed distance which was predetermined by a military board. This is somewhat opposite of what airlines seek in a commuter(regional)aircraft. The only exception seems to be the early Dash 8's. Even De havilland had to fail with the Dhc -4 Carribou and, Dhc- 5 Buffalo. Both were good military fourty seaters but fell short on efficiency for paying passenger purposes. In the end, this plane is a success. It has garnered some market share that's not military. It's well suited to hot, short, rough runways. Otherwise there are better choices in this market. Politics helped to but, that's a whole other story!

User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3498 times:

Does anyone know the reason why Air Namibia doesn't operate them anymore? They used to fly on the WDH-MUB-VFA run three times a week.

Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineCapital146 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2125 posts, RR: 38
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3418 times:

I seem to remember Binter Canarias operating them during the 1990's on its inter-island network in the Canary Islands.

Unfortunately, these quirky aircraft are no longer used by the airline.

Like a fine wine, one gets better with age.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Was Wrong With DL 116? posted Mon Sep 4 2006 09:41:11 by JMO-777
What Was Wrong With The A342? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 03:11:55 by YULWinterSkies
What Was Wrong With The 747-300? posted Sat Feb 16 2002 20:00:15 by Airplanetire
BAe ATP, What's Wrong With It? posted Sun Feb 13 2005 23:25:07 by Gg190
The A3XX, What's Wrong With It? posted Thu Jun 22 2000 17:02:35 by Nchua64
What Is Wrong With Silverjet? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 18:35:49 by Continental123
What Is Wrong With AA? posted Mon Nov 27 2006 07:06:48 by Tonytifao
What Is Wrong With BKK? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 08:51:09 by GneissGuy
What Went Wrong With Delta's MD-90s? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 19:22:02 by 1337Delta764
What Is Wrong With This A/c? posted Wed May 17 2006 08:41:00 by Alespesl