Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AS Posts 1st Qtr Results - Loss Of $42M  
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 14006 posts, RR: 61
Posted (11 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3244 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Alaska Air Group narrowed it's 1st Quarter loss - but it's still a loss.  Sad

Contact: Brad Tilden -or- Lou Cancelmi
206/392-5362 206/392-5170



SEATTLE — Alaska Air Group, Inc. (NYSE:ALK) today reported a first quarter net loss of $42.7 million, or $1.59 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $56.3 million, or $2.12 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2003.

First quarter results include an impairment charge of $2.4 million ($1.6 million, net of tax, or $0.06 per share), related to Horizon’s F-28 aircraft and related spare engines. The first quarter results reflect higher passenger revenue at both Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air compared to the same period in 2003, partially offset by exceedingly high jet fuel costs. Higher than expected winter traffic and improved yields resulted in an increase in passenger revenue of $77.8 million ($62.3 million at Alaska Airlines and $12.0 million at Horizon Air), or 16.4 percent, as compared to the same period in 2003. Aircraft fuel costs increased $18.0 million, or 20.1 percent, versus 2003.

"The first quarter is traditionally our weakest, and this one included the added burden of high fuel prices and a severe winter storm," said Bill Ayer, chairman and CEO of Alaska Air Group. "Despite these obstacles, we narrowed our year-over-year loss by $13.6 million, or 24.2 percent. But the bottom line is that we had a sizable loss, illustrating that we still have work ahead.

"I'm encouraged, though, by the fact that we continue to move in the right direction. This marked the seventh consecutive quarter we realized year-over-year improvements in our cost structure at Alaska and the sixth of seven quarters at Horizon. One particularly gratifying aspect to the quarter was that revenues increased due largely to double-digit growth in passenger boardings at both Alaska and Horizon. That's a strong endorsement of our value proposition - outstanding service at the right price, delivered by caring employees."

Operationally, Alaska Airlines' passenger traffic in the first quarter increased 13.9 percent on a capacity increase of 10.0 percent. Alaska’s load factor increased 2.4 percentage points to 69.1 percent compared to the same period in 2003. Alaska’s operating revenue per available seat mile (ASM) increased 4.6 percent, while its operating cost per ASM excluding fuel decreased 1.6 percent. Alaska's pretax loss for the quarter was $53.2 million, compared to $70.6 million in 2003.

Horizon Air's passenger traffic in the first quarter increased 26.1 percent on a 12.3 percent capacity increase. Horizon’s load factor increased by 6.9 percentage points to 65.0 percent compared to the same period in 2003. Horizon’s operating revenue per ASM decreased 0.8 percent, while its operating cost per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charges decreased 8.9 percent. The decrease in Horizon’s revenue per ASM and cost per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charge is largely due to the addition of Horizon’s contract flying for Frontier Airlines. This flying represented 16.2 percent of Horizon’s capacity during the first quarter and 7.4 percent of its passenger revenues. Horizon's pretax loss for the quarter was $10.4 million, compared to a pretax loss of $15.3 million in 2003.

Alaska Air Group had cash and short-term investments at March 31, 2004 of approximately $830 million compared to $812 million at December 31, 2003. The increased balance primarily reflects cash generated from operations and the financing of two Alaska aircraft, partially offset by the purchase of one aircraft, capitalized overhauls and debt repayments. The company’s debt-to-capital ratio, assuming aircraft operating leases are capitalized at seven times annualized rent, was 78 percent during the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to 77 percent as of December 31, 2003.

[Edited 2004-04-23 16:22:35]

"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDash8tech From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 732 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3211 times:

We're getting there....1st quarter is always tough though. Fuel is a killer, heck I can barely afford to get to work on these prices!  Embarrassment

User currently offlineFullThrottle From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3163 times:

They will do better the next three quarters. That is not that bad of a loss compared to other companies. AS is a great company and I am excited to be an intern in the summer.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AS Posts 1st Qtr Adjusted Net Profit posted Sat Apr 22 2006 08:47:42 by EA CO AS
AS Posts 2nd Qtr Results - $17.4M Profit! posted Thu Jul 21 2005 17:40:43 by EA CO AS
AS Posts 4th Qtr And Year-End Results posted Thu Jan 30 2003 16:55:41 by EA CO AS
America West Posts 1st Qtr Profit posted Tue Apr 20 2004 21:09:09 by Flyboyaz
YX Posts A 2nd Qtr Loss Of 8.2 Million posted Thu Jul 28 2005 18:55:03 by AirTran737
AS Posts 3Q06 Results posted Tue Oct 24 2006 19:01:03 by EA CO AS
US Airways Posts Q2 Loss Of US$62 Million. posted Fri Jul 29 2005 16:04:05 by 7LBAC111
Bmi Posts Pre-Tax Loss Of US$17.8M For FY posted Tue Mar 30 2004 23:48:40 by Singapore_Air
Northwest Airlines Posts Q1 Loss Of US$396 Million posted Wed Apr 16 2003 16:47:56 by Singapore_Air
Continental Airlines Posts Q1 Loss Of US$221 Mil. posted Tue Apr 15 2003 14:10:07 by Singapore_Air