Espion007 From Denmark, joined Dec 2003, 1691 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 35526 times:
if you dont know already some A.net members have flamed the website letsroll911.org.why?well because the site says its got "proof" of a missile on the 767 that crashed into the 2nd tower on 9/11 in a few blurry,grainy frames.
now,after trying to show them why this is impossible,they are saying were denying what happened because we cant handle the truth,we dont know anything about aviation bla bla bla.looks what he put on the front page now!
Apparently they dont like to be told the truth.oh well,gotta go,the black helicopters are watching me,and those 747s are spraying the atmosphere with their chemtrails!
LY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 33563 times:
CanadianNorth, that was about the first thing we asked. The genius figured that both 767's that crashed into the WTC (and the two 757's for that matter) were actually replaced in mid air with two other 767's previously modified by the government to become remote-controlled, missile-launching jetliners. Needless to say, this all took place in a secret government base (which must be somewhere in the Northeastern United States according to the time frame). What happened to all those people from the original civilian flights? Why they were all loaded onto flight 93 (all 230 of them on a 757 configured to carry about 170) which was then shot down over Pennsylvania. The real sad part is that they came up with all of the above garbage based on a single, extremely low quality frame of a video. Pathetic morons...
Garnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5450 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 33556 times:
There are two differing schools over there right now
1) The planes that crashed into the WTC were substituted for the real flights sometime after the real flights became airborne, the real flights were then diverted to a military airfield and the occupants done away with, pressed into service in the military (those unable to serve were then killed) or the occupants all loaded onto the airplane that crashed in PA (again, really 3 subschools in this one school)
2) The planes that crashed into the WTC were not planes at all, but cruise missiles fitted with hologram generators, as someone has found something or other to indicate that there was no Flight 11 or Flight 77 on 9/11.
South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
Pmanchuk From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 33225 times:
My god, what a freakin' nutcase... I don't know whatelse to say. Hmmm, there's a reflection on the fuselage... couldn't be the sun or anything like that... must be a missile.... WHAT A FREAK!
I mean come on... isn't it every day that our own government sends out "special" 767's that are mysteriously swapped mid-flight with commercial airliners... just to crash into buildings? Oh, and let's not forget... the buildings didn't fall down because of the impact, no... they were really rigged with explosives to demolish them. I've heard some stupid stuff in my life, but this just goes FAR beyond idiotic!
Someone desperately needs a shrink AND FAST! I wonder if this guy has a "JFK & the 2nd shooter" website too... or maybe "UFO's... the REAL story".
BR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 33165 times:
Why do I get the feeling that Mr. Missile pod is like Newton off of Men in Black II. 40 something years old and still lives with his momma. Mr. Missilepod needs to go outside and see that the sky is really blue.
Espion007 From Denmark, joined Dec 2003, 1691 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 33049 times:
I wonder if this guy has a "JFK & the 2nd shooter" website too... or maybe "UFO's... the REAL story".
umm id like to say right now i also think there was a 2nd shooter.Ive seen one and only 1 video of kennedy actually being shot and well it sure doesnt look like the shot came from behind.unless someone can prove otherwise,thats what ill belive.what if the shot really came from the grassy knoll?
well im not going to start a crazy creepy conspiracy site,saying crazy stuff like the alphabet predicted kennedy's death bla bla bla
Assasination Book Depository Cuban connection Dead president Execusion of suspect
Like i man at the globe theatre once said "we mean not to offend..."
As for the missile pod,i like to get a laugh out of people trying to argue with aviation enthusiasts and actual pilots.Is like me trying to tell a doctor that you dont need a liver to live
Dan2002 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 2055 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 32177 times:
Yeah, and if you look really close to the video of the second plane, right after the missile hits the tower, and after the nose goes in, you can see between the little pixels, a chemtrail, and a big one!
A guy asks 'What's Punk?'. I kick over a trash can and its punk. He knocks over a trash can and its trendy.
B757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 31379 times:
Hmmmm I wonder how many of those were just logging in to see what a nutter this guy is?????
Every forum where I'm a member of has had at least one thread talking about how crazy this nutcase is so that is why he is getting lots of hits. Everyone wants to see just how crazy he is so we can make fun of him.
Greasespot From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 3091 posts, RR: 20
Reply 21, posted (11 years 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 31259 times:
For a dumb web site a lot of people have looked at it. Yeah I am just as guilty as everyone else I have looked at it also.. I dunno believe it or not is is interesting reading it. More to just see what he writes next...
Sometimes all you can do is look them in the eye and ask " how much did your mom drink when she was pregnant with you?"