Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ticket Has No Value Policy  
User currently offlineMY7E7 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 76 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2545 times:

How many of you have booked a flight, couldn't make it for one reason or another and didn't rebook before or on the day of departure and had to throw the ticket away?

Eat your heart out CO!




I'm not always right but that's no reason to insult me
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRobsawatsky From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 597 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

Hasn't happened to me but I have heard several complaints about this particular ticket rule and how it is "unfair". My response is always to question why they expect the airline to waive the rules for them? What is unfair about following the terms and conditions of a contract?


User currently offlineMY7E7 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 76 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2387 times:

It's not really a question of fair or unfair. I agree with you that both parties entered into a contract, basically. COs reservation agent did admit that if I would be a CO high tier member she would rebook me on a future flight to ZRH and I could still use that expired ticket. I don't remember reading about that 'exception' in the 'contract' either. It was a $600 ticket, it's not the end of the world and I fly every week anyway, just not on CO.


I'm not always right but that's no reason to insult me
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2348 times:

What is "unfair" about it is that the ticket is also not transferable - if it were, you could give or sell it to someone else who COULD take the trip. They like to use the "super bowl" or "theatre tickets" excuse...if you can't make it to the performance, you won't get your money back, and the ticket has "no value". But I can SELL my superbowl or theatre ticket to someone else for them to use and not suffer a loss. Can't do that with airline tickets.

User currently offlineMY7E7 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 76 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2342 times:

yeah that was exactly what they told me, it's like not showing up for a broadway show. They told me that I just have to rebook before or on the day of departure. It's an international flight that had a $200 rebooking fee and I didn't know when I was going for sure, so I asked, I just keep rebooking and paying $200 a couple of times until I know for sure when I can go? the CO agent said: yes


I'm not always right but that's no reason to insult me
User currently offlineTFJamie From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2315 times:

This is of course the airline's way of being able to offer cheap fares. If you get a cheap fare it is very important to read the rules. If it weren't for rules like that fares would be much higher. Nothing unfair about that. If you have to change your flight, buy an unrestricted ticket or travel insurance

About the non-transferability issue. It's the airlines' way of tracking who flies them it's both a security issue and about an airline being able to have control of their own ticket prices.

So this is really not unfair. Whithout these rules fares would be much higher and loads would be much more unpredictable.


User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2305 times:

I don't buy the security argument. All it would take is one phone call to the airline to say "change confirmation # 5GHF4W to John Smith at 123 Main Street, Omaha Nebraska". There's a way around the unpredictability of loads also...still make them valueless after the flight - just allow someone to transfer the ticket. If they can't sell it, then the airline gets to double book the seat and take one person for the price of two.

User currently offlineORDagent From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 823 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2250 times:

so I asked, I just keep rebooking and paying $200 a couple of times until I know for sure when I can go? the CO agent said: yes

Thats a load of BS! CO's current policy sates that you have one year from the date of issuance to reuse the ticket as long as you have cancelled the reservation prior to the time of departure.


User currently offlineMY7E7 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 76 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2177 times:

ORDagent: If I would have rebooked the ticket PRIOR to departure, I wouldn't have started this discussion. It's been a while since this happend to me, maybe it's change but on that ticket I had which was highly discounted, there was a rebooking fee of $200 every time I would change the reservation.


I'm not always right but that's no reason to insult me
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2121 times:

Thats a load of BS! CO's current policy sates that you have one year from the date of issuance to reuse the ticket as long as you have cancelled the reservation prior to the time of departure.

According to the penalty rules for a CO fare I checked at random, I found this:

ON/PRIOR TO TICKETED DEPARTURE TIME OF EACH
FLIGHT - CHANGES ARE PERMITTED - USD 100.00
CHANGE FEE APPLIES.


So it looks like you can change the ticket and reuse it prior to departure, minus a $100 change fee.

I do know that UAL will charge the change fee each time a ticket is changed - had it happen to me (almost) when I had to change an MCI-ORD ticket outbound and return - As the agent was making the change and preparing to charge my card I happened to mention that it would have been cheaper for me just to buy a full fare ticket for less money than I have been charged for the original ticket and the first change fee and the change fee she was getting ready to assess. She stopped a minute, handed me my card back and said "You're right - it's pretty stupid" and made the change without charging me again.


User currently offlineN6376m From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

The problem with analyzing an airline ticket under a contract scrutiny is that the obligations are mostly onesided.

Once you've paid for your ticket the airline has your money. If the flight is late or cancelled for stuff within their reasonable control, they don't owe you anything for consequential damages. If you purchase a ticket to go from Point A to Point B on a specific date at a specific time, why shouldn't the carrier be liable for damages arising out of their breach of contract. The disclaim all such liability including if it is caused out of their own negligence or willful misconduct.

Furthermore, this game they play with announcing pricing and waiting to see what their competitors do boarders on anti-trust violation. Have you ever noticed that they all act in lock step with one another?


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2044 times:

If the airline can't get you to your destination within a reasonable time and the reasons why are not outside their control they ARE obligated to compensate (though there are strict limits to the amounts to avoid insane lawsuits from people demanding a billion dollar compensation for getting home 5 minutes late).


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSJU767 From Puerto Rico, joined Feb 2004, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2042 times:

MY7E7

Next time buy a fare without any restrictions, usually a Y. The cheaper the fare the more restrictions.


User currently offlineN6376m From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2026 times:

Jwenting -

They are obligated to compensate you based on a formulary rate (something like $200 + the cost of your ticket if you're 2 hours late and $400 + the ticket if you're more than 4 hours late), NOT for your actual damages EVEN IF those damages can be demonstrated.

While I agree that there would be people demanding ridiculous sums of money for very little actual damage, sometimes there are real damages that arise. I'm not aware of any other industry where actual damages due to negligence or willful misconduct are capped.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13643 posts, RR: 62
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2011 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The reason the carrier is not responsible for any damages arising from delays or cancellations is that the ticket, as has already been mentioned, is a non-transferable contract between the customer and the air carrier.

Over the past few decades, the airlines have become VERY good at making the verbiage in the contract so that it insulates them from lawsuits for things like not being on time:

Carrier undertakes to use its best efforts to carry the passenger and baggage with reasonable dispatch. Times shown in the timetable or elsewhere are not guaranteed and form no part of this contract. Carrier may without notice substitute alternate carriers or aircraft, and may alter or omit stopping places shown on the ticket in case of necessity. Schedules are subject to change without notice.

When the customer purchases a ticket, they're giving their tacit acceptance to these terms, even if they may not have taken the time to review the terms fully.




"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineRobsawatsky From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 597 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

"Furthermore, this game they play with announcing pricing and waiting to see what their competitors do boarders on anti-trust violation. Have you ever noticed that they all act in lock step with one another?"

No, that is called competition. If there was collusion, they would agree to raise prices so they could all make a profit and prices would fluctuate very little.



User currently offlineZrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3181 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1934 times:

Solution:

If you can't use the ticket, pay the change fee and buy a refundable ticket to anywhere for whatever day you wish. Then, when you have cause to use the ticket, rebook at a restricted rate, get a refund on the refundable part (obviously not to be mroe than the original non-refundable part), and off you go.

No need to pay a fee each time you change.



14 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2013
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
747LCF Has No APU? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 02:23:41 by Kaitak744
LH Has No First Class On FRA-DFW posted Mon Jul 10 2006 16:34:43 by BOAC911
AA Has No Love For WN! posted Mon Mar 6 2006 19:20:12 by L1329II
New YYC-EWR Route Has No Posted Fare? posted Sat May 14 2005 08:07:10 by DavidYYC
The King (Southwest) Has No Clothes! posted Fri Apr 8 2005 19:50:22 by Padcrasher
AeroMexico Has No Website For Spain And France? posted Sat Jun 5 2004 21:40:55 by Wolkenridder
What Recently Built Terminal Has No Mainline? posted Sat Jan 24 2004 01:55:50 by Iflyatldl
Gulf Air’s No-discount Policy For Australian Route posted Fri Nov 28 2003 00:14:36 by GF-A330
Why CLT Has No LCC...market? Politics? posted Tue Oct 28 2003 20:08:50 by IslandHopper
AF Says KLM Has No Choice posted Wed Jan 22 2003 17:27:45 by Ciro