Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airways Or Northwest To South America  
User currently offlineDellatorre From Brazil, joined May 2000, 1088 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4062 times:

I was wondering if any of them ever considered flying to South America or Latin America, besides Caribbean! Us Airways has a strong position in the Caribbean market from CLT, PHL, BOS and even PIT! They fly to San Jose CR which is more like a leisure destination, along with Cancun and Cozumel. Now with US in Star Alliance, wouldn't be reasonable getting in some hot leisure destinations down under! Could PHL-GRU or even CLT-GRU, with code-share with RG of course, work out or that's just a little too off! Would RG benefit from a most wanted BOS-GRU with US presence in Logan?


What about Northwest from DTW? Expansion to Latin America is under consideration?

What do you guys think about that? AA), Japan">NRT is served by AA, UA, CO, NW, and DL! London follows, as Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.

My point is, a key city in a continent like Tokyo is served by AA from a couple of US cities, though AA's weak presence in Asia, not to mention DL and CO! I know about CO Micronesia, OK!!!!!

The big question is: Would NW or US make any profit flying to Sao Paulo from their hubs?

Tomorrow May 9th is mother's day here in Brazil,
so best wishes to all members mothers!!!


15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN670UW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1603 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4024 times:

I think a PHL-GRU route (especially with a Varig codeshare) would be successful. CLT-GRU may even be successful, but that would rely very heavily on connecting traffic.

The problem is, US Airways doesn't have any widebody aircraft to open such a route. The 10 767's and 9 A330's are already assigned to the European routes, and until the 332's start coming in (which is questionable that they ever will), South American routes will have to be put on hold.



670


User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3989 times:

If NW wasn't aligned with DL, or more importantly, CO, they would probably start GIG, EZE, and maybe GRU. As is, the alliance provides adequate service to Latin America, and NW doesn't have the planes to commit to this new service.


Regards,

N-Dub



Create your own luck.
User currently offlineAviateur From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1351 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3914 times:

Inneresting question.

As far as I know there have never been any BOS-South America flight whatsoever. Am I wrong?

Hope you'll check out my articles...

http://dir.salon.com/topics/p_smith/index.html



Patrick Smith is an airline pilot, air travel columnist and author
User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2224 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3885 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I seem to remember about 10 years ago NW was asked this question. That was right when AA was making noises going that way and management pretty much dismissed the notion but not really giving a reason why. As has been said earlier, with CO and DL and NW in alliance now, it doesn't seem prudent to be redundent.


Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineDellatorre From Brazil, joined May 2000, 1088 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

So the are fleet and alliance issues! Even though, why DL keeps flying to JApan, if NW and CO can offer easy connections to Asia through MSP, DTW, IAH and EWR? DL and CO seem to be competing on their L American routes! I don't think that alliance is a fair excuse! DTW may demand some non-stop conection to S. America! Aren't they getting a few 332?

In US Airways case, I imagine that UA could handle a couple of parked 767 to US!

Just my thoughts!


User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2224 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3809 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

OK Then, if you won't buy the alliance excuse then you will have to accept an economic one. IF the market was there and the political means available to make the service work and IF we have a capitalistic company trying to make a profit in a market we have never been in, in an era where we can't make a profit in our home markets I would assume we would be trying to start service to SA. Absent that effort, hence your question, then I would have to return to the first as a flawed assumption - the market ISNT there.

Remember, strong markets can be shared among alliances. Weak ones cannot.



Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3648 times:

As mentioned, its very unlikely that NW or US will open routes to South America in the near-term future for several reasons.

1. Neither has a well placed hub to launch South American services - CLT for US and MEM for NW, their southern most hubs, would have a hard time supporting South American services - neither could generate O&D traffic. For a route to make a good profit, a reasonable mix of O&D and connecting traffic is required, which explains why so much of the service between the US and Latin America is routed via MIA.

2. Much of the airservice between the US and SouthAmerican nations is controlled by treaty - for the most part, its not an open-skies situation and it would take lots of time and negotiation for either carrier to open the routes. For example, CO for years wanted to fly EWR-Buenos Aires; after years of waiting, authority was finally granted but this came after 9/11 when the airlines were in their worst trouble and the Argentinian economy had hit bottom - CO elected not to fly the route and the authority was resassigned to DL for ATL-EZE.....CO is out of luck.

3. Neither has the aircraft - NW needs all of its A333s to replace DC10s on European services and all of the A332s for fleet replacement on pacific services and the SEA-AMS route......nothing is left over; its still not clear what NW is going to use on DTW/MSP-HNL routes after the DC10, never mind an expansion into south america that would required many aircraft. US uses its long-haul craft to europe and some high density routes, it has nothing left over and very few seriously think that US will be able to accept delivery on the A332s due to finances.

4. Alliance partners can handle these routes - NW can route pax on CO via IAH and EWR, and US can route pax on UA via IAD or MIA (UA has cut most south american routes) or on RG via MIA.


User currently offlineKlwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2015 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3574 times:

Dutchjet, DL's ATL-EZE and CO's EWR-EZE authorities were assigned at the same time. DL did not seize CO's unused authority for the route. DL also eventually dropped EZE as well. AA took CO's unused EZE authority and I think used it for DFW-EZE..

User currently offlineUsatoeze From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 358 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

1. Neither has a well placed hub to launch South American services - CLT for US and MEM for NW, their southern most hubs, would have a hard time supporting South American services - neither could generate O&D traffic. For a route to make a good profit, a reasonable mix of O&D and connecting traffic is required, which explains why so much of the service between the US and Latin America is routed via MIA.

Dutchjet makes some great points, but none greater than this one. Look at where US and NW are strong...are there any large O&D markets to/from South America? Not really, or at least not ones which aren't already served. US owns market share in PHL, PIT, CLT and a few other cities in the northeast. NW is strong throughout the upper midwest...where are the ties with South America?



War is a very poor political tool
User currently offlineMarcolic From Mexico, joined Dec 2003, 51 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3421 times:

US and NW, fly to Mexico City, in Latin America,

HaPpY mOtHeR's DaY



I love aviation
User currently offlineNeo From Brazil, joined Jan 2001, 671 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3297 times:

It's very unlikely that either NW or US will start service to S.America....

There are just so many reasons, that have already been pointed out here why this is just not gonna happen in the near future...

However, I do think that there are still room for growth in this market. There are several routes to be resumed or started that could really work.

some of them are:

MIA-MAO
MIA-SSA-REC or MIA-REC-SSA
MIA-BSB
MIA-COR
MIA-MVD ?? i don't know if MVD could sustain a non-stop service to MIA??

JFK-GIG
JFK-SSA or REC (seasonal)
JFK-SCL
JFK-VVI-LPB

BOS-GRU

EWR-GIG
EWR-EZE

IAH-SCL

LAX-EZE

SFO-GRU

..... I'm sure there is probably a few more.. but anyway..

All of this would of course depend of how the airline industry will do in the next year... i'm sure some of the routes listed above are more unlikely to happen then others... but at least should be considered...

Rgs.

Neo









User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32603 posts, RR: 72
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3284 times:

MIA-MAO
MIA-SSA-REC or MIA-REC-SSA
MIA-BSB
MIA-COR
MIA-MVD ?? i don't know if MVD could sustain a non-stop service to MIA??


Lloyd Aero Boliviano flies non-stop between Miami and Manaus every Wednesday and Saturday.

TAM flies non-stop between Miami and Salvador every Sunday.

American Airlines flies direct between Miami and Montevideo daily with a stop in Buenos Aires.

Varig has served Recife, Salvador da Bahia, Manaus, Belem, and Fortaleza from Miami in the past, but dropped them because they went to concetrating all long-haul out of GRU. They are now re-opening those discontinued long-hauls, and some of the older Miami service may resume.

Cordoba has had non-stop service to Miami in the past on Aerolineas Argentinas. Demand exists for 2-3 weekly flights. Southern Winds Lineas Areas holds the route authority and was planning on starting the route, but when the Argentine economy collpased, they decided better safe than sorry, and went with MIA-EZE instead.

TAM operated a daily A320 service between Brasilia and Miami with a stop in Manaus for a short time between July 2001 and December 2001. It did decently, but it was launched during too difficult a time.



a.
User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3267 times:

There are several routes to be resumed or started that could really work.

some of them are:

MIA-MAO
MIA-SSA-REC or MIA-REC-SSA
MIA-BSB
MIA-COR
MIA-MVD ?? i don't know if MVD could sustain a non-stop service to MIA??

JFK-GIG
JFK-SSA or REC (seasonal)
JFK-SCL
JFK-VVI-LPB

BOS-GRU

EWR-GIG
EWR-EZE

IAH-SCL

LAX-EZE

SFO-GRU



True, all good route possibilities... but in regards to the main topic, none of these would be feasible for US or NW, as both airlines would need substantial feed in addition to strong O&D to open a South American gateway.


Regards,

N-Dub



Create your own luck.
User currently offlineNeo From Brazil, joined Jan 2001, 671 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3160 times:

True, all good route possibilities... but in regards to the main topic, none of these would be feasible for US or NW, as both airlines would need substantial feed in addition to strong O&D to open a South American gateway

That reinforces the idea that neither US or NW will likely start service into South America!!!

Rgs, Neo


User currently offlinePluna757 From Uruguay, joined Mar 2004, 18 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3023 times:

MVD could have a MVD-MIA non-stop without problem, not daily but at least three times weekly would be ok, and IB will be flyin MVD-MAD a 12:30 hrs flight non stop, so I dont see the problem.............you said MIA-COR , well Cordoba is just a "little town" compared to Montevideo and what Montevideo means to South America, not sure how many residents COR have, but this is not about residents at all, just the meaning of a town in the middle of argentina and the capital of Uruguay.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would US Airways Make It In South America? posted Thu Sep 30 2004 03:34:53 by Upsmd11
To Florida: US Airways Or Delta posted Thu Nov 1 2001 16:28:03 by ROSWELL41
New Routes From US To South America! posted Sat Oct 28 2000 06:46:03 by Dellatorre
Did LH Ever Flew To South America Through JFK? posted Tue Oct 31 2006 17:22:38 by Eastern023
Chinese Airlines To South America? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 20:10:07 by Thepilot730
Lufthansa's Policy To South America: Why So Forgot posted Fri Oct 20 2006 19:19:53 by LipeGIG
UA To South-America posted Thu Jun 22 2006 14:55:22 by Canib7599
Taiwan President Takes CI 747 To South America posted Fri May 5 2006 15:21:21 by 777way
Will KLM Use More 777 To South America? posted Sat Jan 7 2006 10:41:29 by RootsAir
US Airways Not Returning To La Romana posted Tue Dec 6 2005 22:44:29 by A330323X