Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air-to-Air Refueling  
User currently offlineDFWJIM From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 39 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1866 times:


This may be a stupid question but here goes...has there ever been, or is there currently, any consideration ever given to equipping airliners with the capability of being refueled from a tanker aircraft during flight? Of course this idea wouldn't work for short flights but for long international flights wouldn't this allow airliners to carry more passengers and/or cargo? There would be a lot of things to take into account, ie aerial tankers,training...etc but it doesn't hurt to be creative.

Thanks for your responses.

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1791 times:

By the time you pay to get the tanker up there, go through the time-consuming task of refueling, etc., it probably wouldn't be worth the savings. Either way, you are paying to get that big load of fuel into the sky.

Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlineGoose From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 1849 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

Imperial Airways did some experiments with mid-air refuelling with their 'Cambria' Empire flying boat in 1939.


"Talk to me, Goose..."
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2169 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1638 times:

I think there are many reasons this will never be seriously considered by the airlines. First off, they have aircraft for each type of route they intend to fly. Secondly, the cost of installing IFR (In Flight Refueling) capability, coupled with the requisite training of their pilots, would be prohibitive. Also, I'm not sure the military would be keen on flying tight formations with non service crews. Anytime you have aircraft of that size in such close proximity, there is a potential for a mishap. I just don't see the general public nor the CEO's ever accepting that risk.

But most of all, I just don't think it is really necassary with todays long haulers.

Here Here for Severe Clear!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Omega Mid Air Refueling 707 posted Sat Mar 23 2002 23:40:36 by Mikeclod
Korean Air Interview's Minor Excerpt posted Wed Dec 13 2006 19:17:38 by Jimyvr
Boeing & Air France Relationship Now Even Tighter posted Wed Dec 13 2006 18:15:04 by DIA
Iran Air: Leased Fokker 100? posted Wed Dec 13 2006 11:25:37 by ChiefT
Air Berlin Expects Yearly Growth Of 10-13 Percent posted Wed Dec 13 2006 09:51:44 by PlaneHunter
Air Berlin Expands Network, Adds Russia posted Wed Dec 13 2006 09:38:43 by Flying-Tiger
Airtran Proposes Merger With Midwest Air posted Wed Dec 13 2006 03:00:54 by Travatl
UK Air Passenger Duty - Pay Extra At Check-in?! posted Wed Dec 13 2006 00:09:05 by Demoose
Arrow Air Cyqx Crash DEC12/1985 posted Tue Dec 12 2006 22:44:48 by Jetset
Air Jamaica - Power Ports On A340? posted Tue Dec 12 2006 15:18:20 by BA380