Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TWA's Idlewild Terminal: How Illegal?  
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 7228 posts, RR: 7
Posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3450 times:

NY Times for 17 May has a front-page article on changes in NY City building codes. In the continuation on page B4 there's a sidebar "History Rewrites the Rules" listing the years of various changes, and the last is 1968:

"1968-- The building code is rewritten again, allowing for new, lighter-weight materials and spray-on fireproofing. Previously illegal techniques, like those employed in 1962 to build the T.W.A. terminal at what is now Kennedy International Airport would now be possible in New York City."

The article says nothing more about it. What, if anything, was illegal about the Saarinen terminal?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineLY4XELD From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 858 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3407 times:

Looks like they were referring to the TWA terminal using those spray-on fireproofing and lighter-weight materials? This exceprt seems like a rather cryptic, but I'd imagine the design of the TWA terminal wouldn't have been possible without light weight materials.

That's why we're here.
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13863 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3029 times:

What that really meant was that at the time of the construction of that famous TWA terminal building, it was using techniqes of construction that were new then, but not yet approved by NYC building/fire codes. The airports within NYC, JFK and LGA, have always been under the authority and jurisdiction of the NY NJ Port Authority, they didn't have to follow the NYC codes. It wasn't until 1968 that these newer methods of construction were allowed by NYC codes. The exemption of jurisdiction of the NY/NJ PA also included the construction of the World Trade Center complex - it wasn't built in some ways to NYC codes. This may have contributed to its collaspe and some of the deaths. Now ALL buildings within the borders of NYC, except US government owned properties, must meet all NYC building codes. It is interesting to note that right now NYC is revising it's building codes to become more like the general US codes, although with some important exceptions.

User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4297 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2723 times:

Are we talking about Asbestos?
-Mr. X

What now?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
TWA Idlewild To PIT? posted Wed Jan 11 2006 18:49:20 by Ikramerica
JetBlue Construction Plans For TWA JFK Terminal posted Sun Dec 11 2005 07:18:58 by F27XXX
Twin-prop At PA Idlewild Terminal? posted Thu Jul 14 2005 19:47:37 by Timz
AA/TWA STL Terminal Ops. posted Wed Feb 20 2002 00:14:15 by Blink182
Help Save TWA's JFK Terminal posted Mon Aug 20 2001 05:38:26 by N707PA
TWA Saarinen Terminal 1980's posted Tue May 1 2001 04:42:40 by ContinentalEWR
TWA's STL Hub How Is It? posted Wed May 24 2000 01:39:58 by Doug
How Long To Build The DTW Mcnamara Terminal? posted Mon May 1 2006 22:34:56 by 7E72004
How Far Along Is The DTW North Terminal Project? posted Tue Apr 11 2006 22:41:05 by 7E72004
JFK TWA Terminal 5 Usps Stamp posted Sat Dec 10 2005 01:38:49 by BA