Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAA Considering A380 Order  
User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4416 times:

Interesting article in this Week?s Flight. An SAA order for six Airbus A380s to replace the company?s Boeing 747-400s is expected by early next year. The plane would be used on flights to London (from both JNB and CPT) and to Frankfurt, depending on future demand.

(Nothing that new, it was previously rumoured last year)

Jeremiah




Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4305 times:

Honestly, do they really need the A 380? No A VS B please.

Heard that they will keep the B 737s as well as the B 747-400s for a while


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4258 times:

The 737s are on a relatively slow replacement cycle.

The A380's increased range could be advantageous to SAA on several routes.

N


User currently offlineBuckfifty From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 1316 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4238 times:

Probably more to do with A380's being able to fly hot and high out of Joburg with just slightly larger loads than their 744's can handle at this moment.

Or would it be the case that SAA is severely slot restricted at LHR?


User currently offlineAirPortugal310 From Palau, joined Apr 2004, 3573 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4215 times:

After reading a lot of threads on SAA and their operations here in this forum, Ive noticed that alot of their problems at least on the JNB-JFK route is that they like to take a lot of cargo and pax and often end up missing the mark and making tech stops.

I do not know as much as Id like to on aircraft usage and logistics like that, but it would seem to me that in this case:

1) Even if they do not fill the airplane with full passengers (I dont know the popularity of CPT-LHR or JNB-LHR...) then they can use the extra weight savings to carry more cargo or freight...

Is this a fair though? Trade one for the other?

Thought Id try to be contructive for once. Later!



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7985 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4146 times:

I think what SAA really needs is a plane with less weight restrictions from JNB on long-distance flights--or they should redo their timetable for the JNB to JFK route so it factors in the need to stop at the Cape Verde Islands.

Maybe SAA should trade in their current A340-600 fleet for the A340-600HGW when that becomes available? With the range of around 8,000 nautical miles the A346HGW should be able to fly JNB to JFK non-stop with a reasonable load almost year-round.  Smile


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4024 times:

So where do they fly their 744s to?

User currently offlineKa From Switzerland, joined Apr 2000, 660 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3959 times:

Now that VS delays introduction of its A380s SAA might get a sweet deal on those initial airframes (Similar to what they got on the original A346s which weren´t taken by SR if I am not mistaken).

And I strongly believe that SAA could very well use a small number of A380s for the above mentioned routes.

KA.



Keep smiling - you might be on Radar!
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3958 times:

I know that LHR gets 4/5 flights from SA a day! usually 4744's and 1 346!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3937 times:

From what I understand about SAA's dynamics, cost structure, routes, growth outlook, and pax loads. . . . . .I'd have to say that, unlike many other airlines, the A380 would probably make a great fit with this airline. Especially when you take into account the growth curvature over the next 10-15 years.

I, for one, don't have much doubt that we will see the A380 in SAA colors.



Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineMoolies From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3887 times:

SAA fly there 744 to LHR and then the other 2 into Africa. They are really badly slot restricted to LONDON. They get offered gatwick slots some time and in return they want BA to have heathrow slots which is balls.

Ok tonight from Johannesburg to London there are 6 flights. 2 BA 2 SAA 1 VS and 1 CE. In our summer again there will be 10-11 flights a night for some nights others it will be 8-10 from South Africa to London. There are 2 or 3 flights from CPT-LHR tonight.

SAA could really use other more slots in summer. They are starting CPT-Frankfurt and another carrier might start JNB-Munich.


User currently offlineMD80Nut From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 899 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3744 times:

I agree with DIA that the A380 makes sense for SAA, especially for their routes to Heathrow. It looks like LHR is going to be A380 country as airlines seek to increase the number of available seats without increasing the number of flights. I believe BA is eventually going to have to order it to keep up with the competition.

cheers, Ralph



Fly Douglas Jets DC-8 / DC-9 / DC-10 / MD80 / MD11 / MD90 / 717
User currently offlineJfazzer From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 157 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3729 times:

Interesting point about BA, Ralph,
With BA still using the 747 extensively on it's route structure and at one time operating the world's biggest fleet of the type I am sure that the A380 could fit in with their future plans.
The only problems seems to be, that the type is made by Airbus and not Boeing and as we all know with the exception of their A320 / A319 fleet BA loves to buy American.
If it wasn't for government pressure on engine choice, I think they would source their powerplants from the states also.
Any views out there?


User currently offline9V-SPF From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1375 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3687 times:

They are starting CPT-Frankfurt and another carrier might start JNB-Munich.

LH already operates a seasonal (winter only) MUC-JNB service 7X weekly.  Smile

Daniel


User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1405 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3652 times:

I think the A380 will be unstoppable.

Regards

Mike


User currently offlineMoolies From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3626 times:

It is nationwide that want to start the service. from JNB-MUNICH

User currently offlineZSSNC From Germany, joined Feb 2003, 428 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3602 times:

I think that the A380 would make perfect sense for above mentioned routes (LHR/AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA). With AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA being the most important Star Alliance hub in Europe the A380 could very well be needed to meet increased demand to more transferring passengers to Eastern Europe, North America and North Africa. Since LHR is quite obviously right now the only route where 744s are needed capacity wise (the US routes do fine with the 346 and 343 right now capacity wise) this would be the second destination which would make sense for A380 operations. Lets assume you put two A380s daily on JNB/LHR and one daily on JNB/AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA you would need 6 A380s which would exactly match above insinuated order number.

Moolies,

SAA is also viewing MUC for future expansion.

ZSSNC



Airbus A340-600 - the longest temptation in the sky
User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1405 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Any chance of SA coming back to MAN? With their imminent entry into STAR, surely some kind of SA/BD SA-MAN route is on the cards?

Regards

Mike


User currently offlineJfazzer From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 157 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3389 times:

I would love to see the day when they do come back to MAN, but at the moment I can't see it.
At any rate, the route would be best served with a lower seating capacity than 747 or A380.
The A340-300 or even the A330-200 would be ideal, say three times a week.
By the way, does anyone how bad the load factors were when the route was pulled last time?

Oh well I can but dream.


User currently offlineRoberta From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3385 times:

No doubt SAA need the A380. JNB-LHR is one of the busiest routes form LHR out of all airlines all airlines and SAA can not get any more slots there.

User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 22
Reply 20, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3304 times:

and SAA can not get any more slots there.

not necessarily true.They picked an additional 4 weekly slots last year.


User currently offlineBa319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8483 posts, RR: 55
Reply 21, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3289 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The A380 is a perfect for SAA. If SAA could get more slots at LHR they would take them,the traffic between LON and SA just continues to grow, as it will in many other countries as they discover SA as a business and tourist destination.

It is just a matter of time,but SAA will order the A380.

M



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333,342
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3177 times:

Pretty interesting. Does anyone have the article?

Umm..... wonder how long will they keep their B 747-400s for. Afterall they have been upgraded sometime ago. How many do they have? Guess they will still be around for a while.


User currently offlineMark777300 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 388 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3065 times:

Getting off the topic here for one second. Dealing with the slot restrictions at LHR, does anyone know if these slot restrictions will still exist once terminal 5 is opened? I heard that BA was to move all of it's operations into the new terminal 5 once it's open. This would open much needed gate space at the other terminals that are currently being used by BA. No arguments towards the A380, but if that would be the case, I for one would believe that SA would not be looking into the A380 for slot restriction purposes but rather the need to increase it's payload on certain routes. It's already been discussed before that SA frequently fills it's aircrafts with a full load of freight and pax, the A380 would fit in their fleet just fine, no suprises here.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Singapore Will Keep A380 Order posted Wed Nov 8 2006 06:54:55 by Jimyvr
Emirates Tim Clark On EK A380 Order.. posted Tue Nov 7 2006 22:35:09 by Keesje
QF Reports Profit And To Keep A380 Order posted Mon Oct 23 2006 15:02:04 by Mptpa
UPS - Evaluating A380 Order Status posted Sat Oct 21 2006 03:23:01 by Mptpa
Singapore Air May Cancel 9 X A380 Order/LoI posted Wed Oct 18 2006 09:58:20 by PanAm_DC10
Thai Airways Re-Consider A380 Order posted Mon Oct 2 2006 02:26:32 by PanAm_DC10
SQ's Second A380 Order -- In Jeopardy? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 16:20:42 by N328KF
Emirates May Cancel A380 Order posted Thu Sep 21 2006 14:40:54 by ATLflyer
Aboulafia On Singapore Airlines A350XWB/A380 Order posted Sat Jul 22 2006 08:13:25 by Leelaw
An A380 Order At Farnborough This Week? posted Wed Jul 19 2006 23:19:52 by FCKC