Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Trans-Antarctic Flight Question  
User currently offlineAdriaticus From Mexico, joined May 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 19
Posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3165 times:

I was in a dinner party earlier tonight. A Chilean and an Argentinean folk who were there assured us all the flights between South America (SCL, EZE) and Oceania (MEL, PER, SYD) customarily experience disruption of all navigational electronic systems aboard over long stretches of flight over the Antarctic continent... According to them, the SOP of those flights include flying by gyroscope and radar alone...

Is this remotely true, or were they just pulling us a leg? (This was not aviation fans dinner, Ok?)

So, shoot!

__Ad.

[Edited 2004-05-21 06:11:18]

[Edited 2004-05-21 06:11:37]


A300/18/19/20/21 B721/2 B732/3/G/8 B741/2/4 B752 B762/3/4 B772/3 DC8/9/10 MD11 TU134/154 IL62/86 An24 SA340/2000 E45/90
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArcano From Chile, joined Mar 2004, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3104 times:

Hola Adriaticus

No, it's not true. LAN flies over the pacific, I understand they start to cross it at Puerto Montt's latitude, which is funny because Santiago is almost at the same latitude of Sydney (both at 33ºS)

AR promotes their flight to Oceania as "transpolar", but it doesn't fly over the pole. Not sure of they fly over Antartida either, but I think they don't.



You just got some of the so called picardía del Chileno
Saludos )( Arcano



in order: 721,146,732,763,722,343,733,320,772,319,752,321,88,83,744,332,100,738, 333, 318, 77W, 78, 773 and 380
User currently offlineKEno From Malaysia, joined Feb 2004, 1842 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3066 times:

Could somebody please plot the ETOPS for these routes? I'm curious to see if there are any dead spots along the route. I know that the plot lines would not be the true representation of the flight route but it's a good approximation. Gracias.

User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4302 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3064 times:

Yeah, as far as I've been told, there are no problems with the on-board systems on a transpolar flight. What I've always wondered is if on certain flights, if it's sufficiently south, you CAN see Antarctica off your window seat...

The most interesting aspect about those flights is still ETOPS.



My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4302 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3046 times:

Arcano, even if Sydney and Santiago are at the same latitude, routes usually try to follow the great circle routes.


My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2960 times:

QF's flights to South Africa from SYD and MEL travel quite far south. When I flew MEL-JNB non-stop, we could definitely see large icebergs in the ocean beneath - the flight moved off the moving map completely, and had an indicator "2100 km from South Pole" come up instead - OK 2100km is quite far, but its still pretty south.

User currently offlineAdriaticus From Mexico, joined May 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2686 times:

Thanks to those who responded to this thread. Arcano, thanks for the map. I printed it out and met with my colleague (a Chilean attorney) again tonight. I explained him the "great circle" stuff... He swore to me his cousin, a captain for LAN Chile, looses navigational equipment every time he flies to Sydney... Maybe the cousin is pulling HIM a leg...

JGPH1A: << the flight moved off the moving map completely, and had an indicator "2100 km from South Pole" come up instead >>

Could this be indicative the aircraft has left an area covered by positioning satellites and is just being tracked in an indirect manner?

I insist: I am clueless. Confused Confused

__Ad.



A300/18/19/20/21 B721/2 B732/3/G/8 B741/2/4 B752 B762/3/4 B772/3 DC8/9/10 MD11 TU134/154 IL62/86 An24 SA340/2000 E45/90
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4302 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2535 times:

I have promised myself to travel a 'near south pole' route by 2010... just thinking about the isolation of that flight, in both the sense of so few aircraft in the whole region at one time, and nothing but uninhabited icy oceans below, it fires my imagination.

I'll just need to make some good friends on the other side to cut on my hotel bill...



My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offline123 From Bolivia, joined Nov 2003, 745 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2508 times:

Derico: I flew EZE/CPT and CPT/EZE, the onboard airscreen indicated a nearly perfect straight line, not an Antartic line like I expected. It is unreasonable because great circle saves time.

However, the flights were so short I hardly started to enjoy them, only around 7~8 hours, nearly like a flight to Mia and only about 2/3 to Europe.

So I would guess, that according to wind the flights go "straght" or "polar".


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2483 times:

Per an above request:



N


User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4302 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

Quote by 123 #8

"Derico: I flew EZE/CPT and CPT/EZE, the onboard airscreen indicated a nearly perfect straight line, not an Antartic line like I expected. It is unreasonable because great circle saves time.

However, the flights were so short I hardly started to enjoy them, only around 7~8 hours, nearly like a flight to Mia and only about 2/3 to Europe.

So I would guess, that according to wind the flights go "straght" or "polar"."




Hola 123,

Maybe an EZE-CPT, because it is shorter than an EZE-AKL route, can fly more or less 'straight', specially if the jet stream cooperates I would presume.

But on flights to Oceania I would think that would be undesirable, unless there is some terrible storms southbound or something. I mean, maybe someone else can correct me, but I don't remember hearing about an EZE-AKL flight heading straight west, towards Southern Mendoza... they always head south towards Bariloche or Comodoro Rivadavia.


[Edited 2004-05-23 07:12:19]


My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Has There Ever Been A Sked Trans-antarctic Flight? posted Mon Mar 8 2004 04:42:15 by Ssides
NW DC-10 Last Flight Question posted Tue Sep 5 2006 02:31:26 by B6FA4ever
Longest Trans-European Flight posted Wed May 10 2006 16:53:38 by Spetouss
I'm On A NWA Trans Pacific Flight Now, Biz Class posted Mon Dec 12 2005 12:29:26 by Redneckslim
Visiting Cockpit In Flight Question posted Sun Nov 20 2005 15:22:41 by AlitaliaMD11
DE Comfort Class/LH Connecting Flight Question posted Sun Oct 30 2005 22:01:46 by Sabena332
Iberworld Charter Flight Question posted Fri Oct 28 2005 18:15:05 by Ualisthebst
Canceled Flight Question posted Wed Oct 26 2005 03:30:18 by Kimmykun
Southwest Flight Question posted Fri Aug 5 2005 19:15:31 by Luisde8cd
Sun Country Flight Question posted Sun Apr 3 2005 08:19:53 by Future757