Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Runways @ ORD  
User currently offlineUnited777ORD From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 262 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1916 times:

When will construction begin on the new North 9-27 Runway at O'Hare. My mom flew to Newark this afternoon from O'Hare and the delays were horrible. O'Hare needs this runway ASAP..

-United777ORD-

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUAFAN17 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

I don't know but hopefully soon. Your mom is lucky she flew to Newark I was flying to LGA last friday and there were delays at both O'hare and LaGuardia.

User currently offlineAirportplan From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 469 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1828 times:

The current date from the FAA for the O'Hare ROD (Record of Decision) on the ORD EIS (environmental Impact is Study) is September 2005 (see link below). This is the most complex EIS in FAA history. The City of Chicago is seeking RODs on 4 new runways and extensions of two others at the same time. This has never been done before at one airport. A ROD for one runway typical takes 3 or more years. But because of O'Hare delays, and the effect that this has other airports around the country, the ORD EIS is receiving the highest priority.

http://modernization.ohare.com/program_pages/news_items/pdf/FAA_EIS_RODS.pdf



User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

Bureaucrats suck.


Nuff said.



Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

I was reading about the "cost increase in estimates" the other day so the answer to the Q as in when the new runway will exist should be July 35, 2054. In other words, I personally don't think its gonna happen in our lifetime.
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2037 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1602 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The delays at ORD today where not because of a runway. In case you have not looked at the radar lately, it's storming pretty bad, and was yesterday, and the day before too.

User currently onlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23073 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

Most (maybe all?) of the land for 9L-27R has been acquired, and there is much less opposition to expansion from those north of the airport recently. Park Ridge is officially neutral now when 3 or 4 years ago they were leading the anti-expansion cries. If the FAA approves the project, (new) 9L-27R will probably get built regardless of what happens financially with any other parts.


I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4506 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

ORD has a ton of runways, but most of them intersect. Is this what causes delays? You'd think with as many runways as ORD has, delays wouldn't be much of a problem unless due to weather. Can someone elaborate?

User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3527 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

prevailing winds, weather, intersecting runways, LAHSO procedures, lake effect (regarding changing winds), noise abatement, traffic, etc..etc.. are all reasons for the delays caused at o'hare. How would you like to haev 25 jets set up as far out as dubuque iowa and st louis to approach a certain runway and then after having 3 of those a/c land the wind changes and instead of being out of the west (about 300-330 normally in the midwest) they are now out of the east (around 070-150). They need runways that can accomodate a/c of all types that do not intersect (read parallel). I think they are tearing up a few runways as well aren't they? the biggest changes ever seen in the chicago airport system will take effect within the next 10 years, whether it is slot controls, utilizing other airports, or current airport expansion.


Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1465 times:

"slot controls, utilizing other airports, or current airport expansion"

My guess is the first thing we see is some form of slot controls.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NH's (new) NRT-ORD Service posted Sun Sep 10 2006 06:05:21 by Carpethead
Three New Eagle ORD Routes From 6Sep posted Mon Jun 19 2006 18:14:50 by Commavia
IAD Expansion Moving Forward With New Runways posted Thu Oct 6 2005 19:41:49 by KarlB737
Barajas- New Runways Open Soon? posted Fri Mar 18 2005 19:50:17 by Glidepath73
New Runways In The USA posted Mon Nov 8 2004 16:57:12 by Pilotcoex
Air India Confirms New FRA-ORD Service posted Fri Aug 22 2003 08:47:19 by B747-437B
New Runways At AMS Schiphol posted Fri Jun 7 2002 10:10:57 by KLM-MD11
"London To Get Three New Runways" posted Wed Jan 23 2002 04:46:04 by Hoffa
US Airports With New Runways Coming? posted Wed Dec 26 2001 13:49:24 by Atcboy73
New AE ORD-TYS, & More posted Wed Nov 28 2001 06:26:12 by PSU_DTW_SCE