Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
To: 767-400er  
User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 1
Posted (15 years 6 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 819 times:

Hey 767-400er. I started this new topic because I thought you might miss my response to your comment on the earlier Lufthansa 767 discussion. The key element to my message and the article, is Lufthansa apparently wants the 767-400ERX. The "X" model has 2000 gallons more fuel than the -400ER and this was apparently what makes it kind of attractive. Anyway, I appreciate your comments.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline767-400er From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 819 times:

I never heard of the "X" model...
The 767-400 is already a "ER" model. Where did you find the info on the "X" model?
Or is it a Lufthansa 'Wish List'?


User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 819 times:

There have been discussions on a longer range 767-400 for quite a while. It would help on an L.A. to Europe market. I don't recall where I have read the discussions but I do stay up on Aviation Week & Space Technology and Flight International (as well as about 10 other aviation periodicals). It is felt that while the 767-400ER is good for Delta and Continental, others have found the range to be a little less than they would have liked. Specifically, I have read comments that if the -400 has the range of the 300ER, then there will be more buyers. Lufthansa by the way, said it was the 767-300ERX (a longer range derivative of the -300ER under study) would be the great transpacific aircraft. I misquoted the article in my earlier comments.

User currently offline767-400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 819 times:

Both 767-400ER and 767-300ER have both close to equal range with the more advance on the aerdynamics and (i think extra tanks).

User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 819 times:

Next time I see something referring to the derivative models, I be sure to send them to your attention. I think you have the best nickname on the forum.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
To: 767-400er posted Sun Mar 21 1999 03:47:59 by Navion
DL 767-400ER - To Europe What About BusinessElite? posted Sun Nov 6 2005 03:41:32 by Deltadude
PW-powered 767-400ER Ever Going To Fly? posted Thu Jan 15 2004 06:39:19 by Thrust
767-400ER Now My Favorite Plane To Fly On! posted Tue Nov 13 2001 17:43:38 by TranStar
Any Room For The B 767-400ER To Go International? posted Wed Apr 25 2001 06:37:01 by United Airline
Delta CDG-CVG From 777 To 767? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 14:57:34 by Nijltje
Headrests On Delta 767-400ER And 777-200ER posted Wed Oct 25 2006 20:31:42 by 1337Delta764
Delta International 767-400ER Conversions posted Thu Oct 19 2006 02:00:24 by 1337Delta764
Delta Domestic 767-400ER Seating posted Thu Oct 12 2006 17:52:32 by 1337Delta764
A UFO Boeing 767-400ER Never Built! posted Sun Oct 1 2006 22:55:03 by Beech19