Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
XJ Saabs  
User currently offlineAlphascan From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 937 posts, RR: 13
Posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

What is the fleet plan for XJ? When will the Saabs be replaced?

BRDFlyer


"To he who only has a hammer in his toolbelt, every problem looks like a nail."
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineXJRamper From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2460 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

about the same time as NW's DC-9s. Laugh out loud The Saabs are workhorses, NW realizes that. People would much rather fly on a jet, but how cost effective is a jet on a route like TOL-DTW or STC-MSP. I don't see XJ replacing all of the Saabs, however, I think that you might see a transition as to the amount of Saabs you see up at WorldGateway or MSP.

XJR



Look ma' no hands!
User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12217 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1557 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Saabs won't be replaced in the near future. They are a perfect fit for XJ ops. Personally I prefer the Dash 8, but like the VP of Gnd Ops, said in the town hall, it's like comparing a Cadillac to a Toyota, both in quality and costs... As far as the A and B models, they will be the first to go.


911, where is your emergency?
User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3888 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

There actually is a plan to retire the saabs... only it seems to change each quarter. By the end of 2004 all the As were to be retired, followed b yall the Bs by 2007. But it seems that the As are remaining in the fleet for the time beings and no more saabs are being retired. FOR NOW. Our growth and business plan is completely controled by Northwest. So, XJ will do whatever NW wants/needs it to do.


AZJ


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7521 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1424 times:

As said the plan was to only retain the B+ models for the long-term. As said all the older A's were to be gone this year, but there are still 2 around in service somewhere. The B's will stay for a while, and of course the B+'s. I believe the count now is at 64 Saab's and will remain around there for awhile. The CRJ's allocated to Pinnacle have been used for expansion, not replacing Mesaba or NW mainline for the most part. Without the Saab many markets would be unfeasible in the NW network.

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

I would also say that since Mesaba has the 'newest' Saab 340 fleet in the world there is no reason to turn them in any time soon with their newest SF340, N457XJ being only 3-4 years old.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineKcrwflyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3795 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1367 times:

they are loud, slow, and bumpy to ride on. thats all we get to DTW in CRW, and those things hurt. Have you heard those things startup before? Its like, will the jet kick in or will the plane fall apart.

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1359 times:

they are loud, slow, and bumpy to ride on. thats all we get to DTW in CRW, and those things hurt. Have you heard those things startup before? Its like, will the jet kick in or will the plane fall apart.

Yea, and the SF-340 is built like a tank, easy to work on, don't break that often, have no real issues or AD to be concerned about...they have fantastic customer support and service for the operators. Mark my words...had Saab designed the SF340 with the PW 120 Series engines, they'd still be building them today..



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineNlink From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1354 times:

Only if Saab could have built an airplane that had a useful load.

User currently offlineKcrwflyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3795 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1346 times:

Mark my words...had Saab designed the SF340 with the PW 120 Series engines, they'd still be building them today..


Arent they still? The website says that they are.


User currently offlineNlink From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1333 times:

The Saab isn't being made anymore. Think XJ took the last one off the line or close to the last. Think back in 1999 or 2000 the last one came off the line.

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1328 times:

Nope.....SF340 production ceased in 2000 with the final deliveries going to Mesaba. Production ended with s/n 459.


Only if Saab could have built an airplane that had a useful load
They did..its called the Saab 2000. Unfourtunetly the market strongly shifted towards RJ's and only 50 where ever made.



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Actually 63 SAAB 2000's were built before production ended in 2000.

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2992 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1286 times:

It's really too bad about the Saab 2000...it was doomed simply due to the fact that it had propellers in front of its engines. I'm sure its economics can beat any RJ, and I can tell you from a passenger's perspective that it's a joy to ride on. Fast, smooth, quiet...on the inside, it's virtually indistinguishable from a jet. But once everyone started jumping on the RJ bandwagon, it didn't have a chance. Sure, RJs have opened all kinds of new "long, thin" point-to-point routes that never would have been possible with turboprops. But they are also being used on many shorter routes where something like a Saab 2000 would be optimal.


Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7521 posts, RR: 28
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1201 times:

I'm sorry you're forced to ride to Saabs, its too bad Charleston, WV isn't the epicenter of the universe.

Sounds like some good ole' irrational fear of props. If CRW could economically support more CRJ flights to DTW, then you'd get them, for you unfortunetely the costs are more oriented toward the Saabs. For a relatively short low-density route it works great. You'll see CRJ's more in the future, but it just isn't that high on the priority list right now.

The Saabs are only rivaled by the Dash-8 in terms of a well built and lasting prop. Unfortunetely you are probably too young to remember much other than the RJ era. They haven't been around that long, and everyone used to fly a lot more on props. You think the Saab is bad, go fly on the B-1900's (the C model that you can't stand up in), some J-31's, a Shorts 360, or even a Metro, then come back and complain about the Saab.



User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1183 times:

FoxBrovo-

The 'true' demise of the Saab 2000 was a late design change to a powered rudder design. Saab did not want to put the aircraft out just to later modify the rudder system for the early production aircraft....that along with design problems with the changes pushed the 1st delivery's back, and by then the RJ market had come alive. The really sad part about it......the Saab 2000 is actually only slightly slower then the Canadair CRJ200 and offers a better fuel economy burn and carries the same number of passangers.



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineKcrwflyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3795 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1176 times:

every other airline that flys into CRW has Crj's, and are prospering. Some airlines boardings have doubled since they haev switched from props to Jets. And no, i dont have a fear of props, i love the D0328, and the dash 8- 300, i just dont like the saabs and Js-41, -31.

User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 8193 posts, RR: 24
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1168 times:

What else is NW or XJ gunna fly into Alpena?  Big thumbs up


This Website Censors Me
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
XJ Flight Attendant Comments posted Sun Oct 1 2006 00:27:33 by Nwafflyer
The Final Days Of Mesaba (XJ)? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 22:45:24 by Clipper707
Judge Says XJ Losing 1 Mil/week Only 10mil Left posted Sun Sep 24 2006 07:38:18 by Ejmmsu
NW Airlink/XJ Saab 340 In New Colors? posted Wed Jun 7 2006 23:24:52 by NWBOS
NW Appeals BK Ruling That XJ Can Withhold Payments posted Sun Dec 18 2005 02:01:11 by LUVRSW
Swiss Saabs And Darwin Airlines posted Fri Nov 4 2005 10:57:18 by BBJII
NW Controlling XJ+9E Aircraft: Good Or Bad? posted Tue Oct 4 2005 03:30:07 by N908AW
NW Misses Another Payment, XJ BK Not Ruled Out posted Wed Sep 28 2005 09:07:45 by AviatorTJ
Swiss To Withdraw The ERJs And Saabs From Service posted Thu Aug 25 2005 14:13:45 by Juventus
Xj Routes With CRJs posted Thu Jul 14 2005 15:30:14 by Nwaca