Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Proposed TSA Improvements  
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1496 times:

You guys have got to see this article. I guess talk is cheap, but actions speak louder. I'll believe Tom Ridge when the changes actually take effect (if they ever do...) and actually works correctly.

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2004-06-03-airport-security_x.htm?csp=28

Any comments are welcomed......


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHirisk From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 223 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

the only way to improve it is to get rid of it and start over


happy contrails
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5293 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1459 times:

Part of the problem is that TSA and dates that it had to carry out specific functions were mandated by Congress with no specific reasoning.

The thinking was that federal employees would do a better job than screeners employed by security companies. Why? I'm a lawyer, and the security people that conduct screening of visitors going into the federal buildings in downtown Chicago aren't deputy U.S. Marshalls. They are employees of a private company that is hired and supervised by the U.S. Marhshall's Office in Chicago. A lot of them are former police officers, MPs, or other law enforcement agents, and a number of them carry firearms.

Granted, in Chicago, besides terrorism, security is designed to keep prisoners from escaping and members of gangs and organized crime from turning courtrooms into shooting galleries. But if the U.S. Marshall feels comfortable with non-federal personnel keeping buildings secure, maybe aviation security can be handled in a similar fashion.

I don't blame TSA for all of its problems, although it comes up with some goofy ideas. Congress gets a lot of the blame.

After Pan Am 103 blew up, the British government decided to upgrade aviation security. It took 4 years to get to a level that officials felt was good, and another 2 to 3 years to get to a level that officials felt could truly thwart almost any attempt to carry out a terror or other criminal act. That's 6 to 7 years of planning, testing, and refining policies and systems.

Congress wanted this done in 15 months, because it wanted to minimize the risk of another attack. If that's the case, Congress should have thought about this back in the late 80s or early 90s.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1392 times:

Put law enforcement and retired law enforcement at the security checkpoints. Those guys would be the TRUE winners of aviation security, IMO.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1894 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1375 times:

It would be nice to see men and women who want to serve this country in a way that truly serves the citizens of this country instead of those citizens of other countries who do not even care for themselves. 350,000 US citizens and close to a billion dollars spent in Iraq alone and we do not even come close to feeling safe. Ask yourself, how much have you spent on personal and family/home security since 9/11? Multiply that by what number? Ridiculous to think that TSA is going to save us.

Turn that country over to their strongest leaders and let them fend for themselves, unless they ask for our help, and let us accept the
consequences. Bring the kids home and let them work here to rid the scum of the earth from our soil.

We can continue to work with, and aid , our allies without exhausting our resourses and burying our children in debt, if not in their graves.




Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1315 times:

TSA Improvements

Now there's an oxy moron statement if there ever was one.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Was N168AM At TSA 08/23? posted Mon Aug 24 2009 02:11:04 by Brenintw
TSA At AUS/DFW... Whats Going On? posted Wed Aug 19 2009 20:00:05 by BWI5OH
TSA Takes Over Delta Gate Podium posted Thu Aug 13 2009 13:26:31 by Jhooper
PDX: $3.5M Proposed To Keep NRT Link Alive posted Mon Jul 6 2009 15:00:23 by MAH4546
TSA Question?! posted Mon Jun 29 2009 09:54:44 by Smcmac32msn
TSA Abuses Pax At STL, Pax Sues! posted Fri Jun 26 2009 22:00:08 by Luv2cattlecall
Opposition To Proposed EU Halon Ban posted Wed May 6 2009 07:17:27 by VirginFlyer
New TSA "Secure Flight" Rule: Matching Names posted Thu Apr 9 2009 15:48:49 by Xkorpyoh
Airline Concept - Ditching The TSA posted Fri Feb 27 2009 08:32:17 by JA
TSA Idiocy Re: Mule Skinners posted Thu Feb 26 2009 01:48:59 by ThirtyEcho