Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Al-Qaeda Warns Of More Attacks On Airlines  
User currently offlineMoolies From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7479 times:

I have just turned the tv on to SKY NEWS. They had a caption at the bottom of the page that al-qaeda has warned of more attacks on airlines. I havnt seen any more details and will post them when I see them.

46 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7402 times:

It should need to be very careful with the protect with those airlines.

User currently offlineGSPSPOT From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3006 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 7311 times:

The only real threat I can think of is either missile attack of jets taking off or landing, or infiltrating airports and gaining access by being an "employee".


Finally made it to an airline mecca!
User currently offlineNoelG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 7310 times:

Jeez not another one - it seems like there's a fresh warning every other week now!

They're not exactly gonna issue a warning then bomb an aircraft are they - do they think we're stupid?

Their main weapon is surprise - which has been demonstrated to deadly effect in the past.

 Insane

Noel.


User currently offlineSupraZachAir From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Feb 2004, 634 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 7221 times:

Anyone else almost feel safer when Al Qaeda goes out of their way to WARN US what they are going to do? It just seems like they're waving the wand before they pull their rabbit out of the hat. Just my $.02.

User currently offlineGSPSPOT From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3006 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 7152 times:

They probably just want to keep people from feeling safe. Harrassment, more than anything.


Finally made it to an airline mecca!
User currently offlineIowaman From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4358 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 7125 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

There have been dozens of warnings since Sep. 11th and nothing has happened, hopefully just another false alarm, esp. since i'm flying back home Wed.!


Next flights: WN DSM-LAS-PHX, US PHX-SJD. Return: US SJD-PHX, WN PHX-MDW-DSM
User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4233 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 7109 times:

Of course al-qaeda would love to attack commercial aviation again. This is not news.

Let's think about this for a second.
(1) A 9/11-type attack is probably going to be much harder to pull off. Credit better security measures, cockpit door modifications, higher surveillance, and as said earlier in this thread, lack of surprise. I'm not going to be stupid enough to say that "it could never happen again" but it's not as likely to occur, in my opinion.
(2) Having someone on the "inside". It is conceivable that a rogue pilot or two might have strong enough ties to al-qaeda and decide to crash his aircraft or hit a target. This is especially troublesome when it comes to foreign airlines as it is very difficult to ascertain who is capable of doing what. And now, of course, those same pilots are protected by stronger cockpit doors, making the chance of thwarting the terrorism from inside the aircraft that much less.
(3) Sabotage. Again, someone on the inside could help in planting a bomb or other device. Scary but we have to hope that those background checks work!
(4) Surface to air missile. To me, this is still one of the most likely scenarios. I am presuming that al-qaeda has launchers and weapons in the US already but who knows for sure. If they do, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that they could blow up a plane on landing or takeoff and they don't even have to be near the airport. Very scary.
(5) Traditional car/truck bomb. These are easy, cheap, and usually cause the most damage and carnage. This is what al-qaeda loves: high body count. Someone could drive a truck up to the front of an airline terminal, for example, and blow it up. Think about how many people are inside of a typical bustling terminal. Very scary, and of course this doesn't have to be at an airport. It could be at a sporting event, a train station, a concert hall, etc.

The hardest part of this whole thing is trying to stay one step ahead. What can be done to prevent another disaster? I don't know but I have to have to faith that the government (and all gov'ts worldwide) are doing everything possible to end terrorism. But I also know the reality - they are going to get through one day and something will happen. The Madrid train bombs were proof that al-qaeda is alive and well and can strike quickly and with devasting results. With all of this doom and gloom, what can we do but continue with our lives? I'm certainly not going to become a truck driver in Baghdad or anything, but I'm going to continue with my 'normal' life as much as possible. I will continue to take buses, trains, airplanes, and attend sporting events because my thinking is "if they get me, they get me". All of these warnings are great at getting the media hyped up but really doesn't accomplish much.



None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineIAHAAPlatinum From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 6989 times:

Well said, Richierich! We learned from 9.11, and we'll learn when it happens again, which I strongly believe it will. I flew three days after flights were allowed following 9.11 (on mostly empty aircraft), and was questioned by many people about being scared. I said it then, and I'll say it now....I'm not going to allow an organization to like Al-Quaeda to take away my freedom, simply by instilling fear.

User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12400 posts, RR: 37
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 6927 times:

I think there's no doubt they will try to attack aircraft again, although it's strange that they mentioned American airlines. Maybe I'm making a mistake, but I thought they were just referring to Saudi Arabia, which is served by no US carriers. British Airways, Swiss, KLM and Lufthansa are among the European carriers which fly there.

I think this is an effort to make people feel more uncomfortable, but it's primarily part of an effort to destabilise the Saudi regime. They know the oil business is heavily dependant on westerners and if they can frighten them out (which they are trying to do), that hits the Saudi economy hard. Unfortunately, the sheer corruption, hypocrisy and profligacy of the Saudi royal family is a drain on Saudi resources and the economy has been doing very badly; the resultant high unemployment is a magnet for extremism, in much the same way as the economic climate of 1920s and '30s Germany was a healthy recruitment driver for Nazism. I don't want to cause offence with so stark a comparison, but the Saudi regime is heading for a fall and it's as well to be ready. I don't think Al Qaeda will feature in the new government, but we won't like it anyway, that's for sure.

As a previous poster said, if Al Qaeda wants to hit, it won't send messages to the media about it beforehand.


User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3204 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 6896 times:

Well I think Qantas is at risk.

The reason is, this year is an election year in Australia. After the terrorists saw how setting a bomb off in Spain rewards right before elections, I think
they are going to try it again. Plant fear into the minds of people.

You know a really effective way would be to plant a bomb on a QF flight into london and explode it over central london.... that way you'd get both the Australian Government and the British Government in one hit. I thin they should both have elections around the same time too if i remember correctly.

Of course, i'd say other non-aviation methods would be favoured this time around, but not having a stable aviation system (or at least confidence in it buy the travelling public) serverly damages western economies. That is the goal afterall.

Of course, it may shock some of you, but I wouldn't rule out an Air France plane being taken down. Their have been serveral attempts to set of bombs in the Paris metro now, that the international intellegence community has thwarted. Perhaps if the US gov shut their mouths and let a few bombs go off in paris, they'd be stronger supporters?

In any case, they (the french) aren't safe either as there are huge arabic communities that live in seggregated conditions in paris and destest the french. So, I think it is safe to Say Air France may be a target just as much as BA/QF or AA.

[Edited 2004-06-07 19:56:30]

User currently offlineUALongHaul From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 227 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 6868 times:

Al Qaeda has not pulled off any airline attack since 9/11.

I for one feel safer when they anounce things. They act like little school kids "look at me now i have scissors and i am going to run with them now, pay attention to me world!"

We have and will continue to make air travel more secure. I feel confident that Al Qaeda or any other bag of nutcases who wrongfuly hide behind religion to make others suffer will continue to become weaker.

We have made substantial progress in better protecting ourselves. While we should remain alert, our lives should not and will not change because of terrorism.


User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2688 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 6805 times:

If you are going to attack the airlines, the stupidest thing you can do is warn them of it  Laugh out loud

Al Qaeda has possibly put a dent in their plans just by doing this. Also, its clearly evident they think they can get away with the same thing twice. You would think they could be a bit more creative. They are assisting their own suicide by warning people of their attacks..as obviously people will be more on their guard.



Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineCoronado990 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1596 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 6783 times:

Remember, the planes used in 9/11 were a means to an end, not the target. I think I would be more worried getting on a cruise ship than a airplane. Talk about sitting ducks!


Uncle SAN at your service!
User currently offlineWesternDC1010 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 327 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6399 times:

Yeah. I saw this on Yahoo! News today which was titled:

'Al Qaeda Warns of Attacks on Western Airlines'

I was like..."Since when did Western Airlines come back?"  Wow! The thrill was only short-lived when reality and logic set in. Embarrassment

- Ron
Western DC-10-10



Western Airlines - The Only Way To Fly
User currently offlinePetazulu From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 701 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6399 times:

As a very frequent traveller, I can tell you that I see more and more rent-a-cops, less TSA, no National Guardsmen. Overall, screenings are more lax and screeners seem mon dimensional. If it isn't a laptop or a pair of sneakers- they don't even look at it! Drives me crazy! We were getting lazy again and are overdue for a reality check.

You are right- one successful missile launch at a plane on US ground would destroy the airline industry. Ugh. Talk about a shaky investment proposition...

Take the racial politics out of this forum please!


User currently offlineGSPSPOT From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3006 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6354 times:

It would wreck an entire industry, but how would Americans get around? Our highways are already overfull, and we have no passenger rail, to speak of... Guess we'd all have to "Go Greyhound"....


Finally made it to an airline mecca!
User currently offlinePsa53 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3052 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6210 times:

I can't understand why the media doesn't
give 24/7 coverage on condemning terrorist
acts of killing, like the stand it takes on gays,
and in my opinion, holds very little political merit.I guess
there's no sex in the issue.Unreal!















Tuesday's Off! Do not disturb.
User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6140 times:

All hail the post-9/11 boogey man: Al Qaeda!

Seriously. They don't have to attack anything any more. They just have to say they will, and everyone sh*ts their pants!



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13010 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6132 times:

In large part, to me these 'warnings' are as others suggest, a form of harassment of the west and the USA, to make us spend more money on higher alerts, etc. But let us not forget that there has been ground to air missle attacks or attempts already in recent years like the Israeli charter plane in Africa a few years ago and several attempts upon US Military aircraft in Saudia Arabia. This could happen near any airport, in the world. We also cannot forget that there could be attempts to use aircraft to wreak destruction, such as sneaking on bombs, etc.. Attacks by car/truck bombs of airport faclities is still possible and not much is being done to reduce that risk.
These Al-Qaeda types are a sub-cult of death who happen to be believers in some pervese interptation of the Islamic faith. There goal is to take over the world, especially all the oil related weath of the Islamic world for themselves and their followers. To me they are as perverse as the Nazis were, living in their obscene fantasay world, their hate of Jews and other 'non-believers' and modernity.


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8021 posts, RR: 26
Reply 20, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 6095 times:

It wouldn't outright destroy the industry - it would just destroy privatized carriers as we know them. Hello government-run air travel.


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineFlyingColours From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2315 posts, RR: 10
Reply 21, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5979 times:

Don't forget the DHL A300 in Iraq as an example of a SAM strike

I'm with the group that believes "If they get me the get me, but I'm gonna make it hell for them first!".

A SAM strike would almost definitly cripple air travel unless they make 20 mile no go areas around airports (That would be good for LCY wouldn't it) - But that idea isn't going to happen now is it.

Phil
FlyingColours



Lifes a train racing towards you, now you can either run away or grab a chair & a beer and watch it come - Phil
User currently offlineStevenUhl777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5963 times:

I think BA and Qantas have a lot to worry about, besides the US carriers. AF and LH I don't think are high priority targets, given that France and Germany opposed the war in Iraq and don't have troops there (though they are in Afghanistan helping with the war on teror).

Australia holds elections for PM before ours in November, and like Spain, it's a conservative PM that supports Bush vs. a liberal that not only hates the war, but Bush as well.

Similar for Britain, though their elections aren't until '05 sometime. Given BA's operations in the middle east, I wouldn't be surprised to see them cancel flights in droves.

I'm flying out of IAD on a UA 747 headed for Frankfurt on July 3rd. A threat like this is a bit unnerving, given the close proximity to a US holiday and outside the nation's capital. But, all this threat talk by these cowards have been hollow anyhow, so I'll be damned if it's going to stop me.


User currently offlineRichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4233 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5613 times:

Good for you, Steven.

I admit that I rearranged some vacation plans to avoid being in Vegas on 7/4 - I am flying out on 7/1 - but not entirely because of al-qaeda. It also works better from a work perspective. The terror threat was in my mind a little, however, which is exactly how terrorism works. Given a choice between flying on 7/4 or on a different day, I'd probably choose a different day, even though I know nothing will happen on that day.

I do agree with everybody that it is dumb and ignorant to blame all Muslims for terrorism and 9/11. This is exactly what al-qaeda wants, to make this a religious war, sort of like a crusade. Nothing pisses them off more as when an Islamic country works closely with Western countries to weed out the bad seeds. From their perspective, Western countries, especially the USA, are only interested in money and oil. To an extent this is probably true but that is overly simplistic. I think a lot of diplomacy has to go into getting away from an "us" versus "them" mentality because this is what fuels the extremist point of view.

Back to the subject - I will briefly bring my religion into it by saying - that I hope and pray to God that terrorism ends soon for all of mankind's sake. "Can't we all just get along?" I fear that answer to this question is increasingly becoming "no".




None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineIfly2eat From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5510 times:

Seems it is just posturing from an organization that is in disarray. Anyone forget that they never warned fellow Muslims about September 11th? Cowards hoping to capture a few headlines- nothing more.


Fly the friendly skys and stay out of mine.
25 Buckfifty : Really, there really is nothing to fear. I'm more afraid thinking of cancer than whether or not someone will rush into the cockpit and slice my throat
26 WestIndian425 : Hey, guys. Not to diminish the possibility of an attack or the severity of the threat, but has anyone else besides me considered that Al-Qaeda could j
27 Post contains links Md80fanatic : Only last month Larry Silverstein (WTC owner) bought the Sears tower in Chicago......so if you or anyone you know works there I would suggest taking i
28 WestIndian425 : MD80Fanatic I highly doubt that 7 World Trade Center was wired with explosives. Remember that the surounding buildings of the twin towers were badly d
29 L-188 : There was something like 20-25 thousand gallons of deisel oil in the basement of WTC-7 that caught fire. It was there to power the City Emergency Comm
30 Aa777jr : Sad to hear since Im a frequent international traverller on our biggest target...AA. You'll be glad to know though, my flight instructor just got outf
31 Post contains links Md80fanatic : Um, I bought that video, America Rebuilds, and yes Mr. Silverstein says they "pulled" the building later in the day on 9-11. Now...when a building fal
32 Skywatcher : I can't figure out how these scum can disseminate their threats to news organizations and have them broadcast without their legitimacy being verified
33 Flymia : Attacks on airliners are very unlikely I think. Unless done with a Private GA or Small Communter plane. It a larger Jet first they would have to get t
34 UALongHaul : MD80fanatic- First off, the last thing this world needs is comments like "......so if you or anyone you know works there I would suggest taking immedi
35 QIguy24 : The "only" thing I can imagine that will happen is the same thing that happened to that Israeli charter departing from Kenya and that DHL flight over
36 Philsquares : Just a few comments from someone who is in the airline industry; behind the cockpit door. 1) Diesel fuel will burn in standard atmospheric pressure an
37 UALongHaul : I do not get the diesel fuel analogy. What does Diesel fuel have to do with anything? Are you saying that if organised, terrorists can act like a "fue
38 Philsquares : A previous poster, Md80fanatic, made referenct to diesel not burning. I only attempted to correct his/her statement. That's all, no hidden meaning at
39 Qantasclub : We should not be afraid-because that is what these guys get off on-instilling fear. I am more determined now NEVER to change my travel plans and my l
40 NORTHSEATIGER : I think these new threats should be taken seriously as they are not about targeting airlines in their own countries but Saudi Arabia, where the violen
41 Na : Looking at what effect the Al Qaida attack had on the elections in Spain its for certain they´ll try something evil big-scale in the US (or outside t
42 Ehvk : I personally think that they won't make an atack with an aircraft, just because everybody is looking at that direction. and the airline sector is verr
43 Md80fanatic : QUOTE: _________________________________ MD80fanatic- First off, the last thing this world needs is comments like "......so if you or anyone you know
44 Post contains images 7E72004 : They are just trying to scare us..it is nothing more than a ploy to scare us again after 9/11...Al Queda can suck my *&^%s...i love flying and always
45 Post contains images Juanchie : Its been almost three years since that horrible september day and at this point, I dont think another terrorist attack is going to be SUCCESSFULL. I t
46 Post contains images Cedarwings : May be it is time to convert to Middle Eastern Airlines.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Government Warns Of More Flight Disruption! posted Sun Jan 4 2004 08:13:27 by 777ER
Icahn Launches More Attacks On TW posted Sat Dec 2 2000 21:23:38 by TurboTristar
U.S. Wants Airlines To Focus More Closely On Wirin posted Sat Oct 8 2005 16:47:28 by Flyibaby
Pig Sick Of No-frills On Full Service Airlines posted Thu Mar 24 2005 15:03:15 by Orion737
Need More Info On Spirit Airlines posted Tue Dec 23 2003 17:26:09 by Modesto2
U.S. Warns Of Al-Qaida Cargo Plane Plot posted Sat Nov 8 2003 14:06:22 by Wannabe
More News On Canadian Western Airlines To India posted Tue Sep 23 2003 22:04:33 by CanadaEH
Croatia Airlines Announces Order Of 6 More Planes posted Fri Jan 19 2001 20:12:33 by 9A-CRO
More News On Air Jamaica posted Tue Nov 28 2006 02:45:15 by Reggaebird
Story Of Suckling Airways On BBC4 posted Thu Nov 16 2006 22:02:18 by David_itl