Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Article: Virgin USA Order Goes To Airbus?  
User currently offlineBCAInfoSys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4635 times:

OK guys.. we've read a lot of articles in the last few days concerning the new Virgin USA start-up and it's selection of SFO as it's primary base of operations. However, there has not been any indication of whether or not the start-up was going to go with Airbus or Boeing aircraft. However, I read the article from the Financial Times and the final line of the article read:

Virgin is expected to order a fleet of up to 30 Airbus aircraft - a mix of A319s and A320s - worth about $1.6bn at current list prices.

However, the article doesn't state it's source for this information. So my question is, should we take this as an indication that Airbus won the contract, or is it still anyone's game? The only thing that gets me is that the article states they will need about 30 aircraft, when Branson has specifically said in the last few weeks that they'll need about 50 aircraft. So that suggest to me that the information may be outdated or inaccurate; kind of brings the credibility of the information into question.

Steve

30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRoberta From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4598 times:

well you work for Boeing BCA, you tell us.

User currently offlineVorticity From United States of America, joined May 2004, 337 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4582 times:

well you work for Boeing BCA, you tell us.

Like anyone that would know that kind of inside information would give it out on a forum  Smile I make sure to only talk about projects I don't work on, as to never give anything away



Thermodynamics and english units don't mix...
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4516 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4581 times:

Used to work at Boeing. His internship ended am i correct.

User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 854 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4580 times:

I belive it when I see it in airbus.com  Big grin

Mike//SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineBCAInfoSys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4553 times:

Nope.. I'm still a current Boeing employee Aloha717200. Maybe ask me before you make statements like that? I'm in the middle of my 2nd internship; and I've been signed on for a full-time position once I graduate.

And the whole reason why I put it out there Rob, is because I've been hearing mixed information (internally and externally) and wanted to get some opinions.

And finally Solnabo said something productive! Everyone break out the champagne and celebrate! He finally showed some restraint and admitted that nothing was for certain and that we have to wait and see!

Regardless however.. speculation people, come on. That's why I put it up there...

[Edited 2004-06-07 21:29:24]

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 984 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4541 times:

This has been a screwy issue. First, V-USA was only considering the A320 series. Then they stated they needed about 30 to begin opperations. Then they went back saying they were in discussion with both Boeing and Airbus. Now they need 50 to begin opperation, and they're back to Airbus! I get the feeling V-USA is going to give Air India a run for its money in terms of fleet planning.

I'm with Mike, I'll believe it when I see it


User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4524 times:

About six weeks ago they said they had terminated discussions with Boeing and were working exclusively with Airbus on the order.

Then, about two weeks or so ago, Branson said they were, in fact, working with both manufacturers.....

Makes it about as clear as mud, right? I think it's likely tied in with his larger purchase of 340-600's or 777-300's.

In this case, I'm pulling for Boeing all the way. They deserve to have a stellar year!


User currently offlineBCAInfoSys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4484 times:

So what do you guys think, does the error in the stated number of aircraft required negate the credibility in stating that the order went to Airbus? Does the one error affect the credibility of the rest of the information? Does it just show that the information is outdated and the author didn't keep up on their research?

User currently offlineVorticity From United States of America, joined May 2004, 337 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4450 times:

Hard to say without knowing the sources for their information. They may have grabbed the information for the article from different sources at different times. It's hard to say since the # of aircraft from whom guesses keep fluctuating with time.

I really wouldn't consider it an indication that they've won, but I wouldn't be holding my breath for a Boeing order  Big grin ... unfortunately



Thermodynamics and english units don't mix...
User currently offlineCaetravlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 909 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4419 times:

I think that I am with Vorticity on this one. It could still possibly go either way, but it seems to be leaning in favor of Airbus. I am still pulling for Boeing though.  Smile


A woman drove me to drink and I didn't have the decency to thank her. - W.C. Fields
User currently offlineCanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2841 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4317 times:

I guess my question is, given the current orders on the books, if Branson makes his order for A320's tomorrow, when will his roll off the line. And, visa versa if he orders the 737.

Some of this has to be tied to what he thinks will be the start date of V-USA. If he can't have the fleet numbers by that date with one company, he'll negotiate with the other. I'd think the delivery date would be a sticking point.



The beatings will continue until morale improves
User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4252 times:

I do not think that sources should be a problem for us, simply because there have been so many articles about Virgina USA ordering Airbus. Origianlly, the articles mentioned Airbus 320-family or Boeing 737NG being selected, but now, they all seem to mention Airbus.

-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineBa319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8561 posts, RR: 54
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4237 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The Sunday Times(UK) had a similar story 2-3 weeks ago,also suggesting Airbus would supply the aircraft,though it only stated A320 series without specific breakdowns between model types.


111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6249 posts, RR: 34
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4229 times:

It may have absolutely no bearing with the VS contest but Airbus did announce last week that the 320 production rate was going up by at least 20% next year.


Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2744 posts, RR: 58
Reply 15, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4154 times:

The 'reports' have definitely been fluctuating.

First, to the best of my knowledge, the number of airplanes being discussed has always hovered around 50 frames. OTOH, there has been no official break-down of this number between firm/option/leased, so different numbers have been reported in different sources. The last I heard, the majority of the aircraft will be leased, at least to begin with.

As already mentioned, VirginUS was reported to be 'only talking to Airbus' about a month ago. However, lately this has been denied, and Virgin has stated that both Boeing and Airbus are still in the running. These reports, whether intentionally or not, have coincided with stronger and more reliable rumors that Virgin Atlantic is very close to a 777 order (initially -300ERs, but possibly also -200ERs). Whether these orders will actually be tied together remains to be seen.

IMO, the narrowbody order will come down to timing. IIRC, VirginUS wants to start operations fairly quickly, and would therefore need aircraft ASAP. According to Boeing, 95% of 2005 production has been sold out. Apparently, this was the primary (though, of course, certainly not the only) reason Jetstar went with the A320. Airbus reportedly still has some empy A320 production slots for mid-2005, mostly reserved to leasors. This makes me think the A320 will get this order, regardless of the VS widebody decision (which at the end of the day, I believe Airbus will still win).

Regards,

Hamlet69



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineVorticity From United States of America, joined May 2004, 337 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4143 times:

Good points on the production schedule, I saw the article about A320 production going up. I'm beginning to really question how wise it was to slow down 737 line as much as they did.


Thermodynamics and english units don't mix...
User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2744 posts, RR: 58
Reply 17, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4125 times:

BTW - Boeing is also talking about increasing 737 production, though I don't believe in the order of 20%.

As I always like to say, time will tell.

Hamlet69



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineDl021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 18, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3983 times:

It is funny how Virgin/ Branson changes their tune about selection right about the same time that a controversy is brewing concerning foreign ownership in a US airline. Is it possible Branson is raising a carrot for the government mule?

WHether he is or not, how will he be able to start an airline in the states without US citizenship?



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineVorticity From United States of America, joined May 2004, 337 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3877 times:

I'd certainly like to see them increase 737 production, guess I'll keep my metaphorical fingers crossed.

As far as Branson changing his tune all the time, I get the feeling it's done to try and sneak out with the best deal possible. I think he probably knows how to work Airbus and Boeing.



Thermodynamics and english units don't mix...
User currently offlineKL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5214 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

I've said from the beginning that it would be a mix of 319's and 320's.

For the passengers it's the best product, and for VS as well, since they are already an Airbus customer and might get discount on there future longhaul fleet.

Besides, they are so beautifull!!


User currently offlineStarrion From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1126 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3501 times:

You never know.

Branson could be waving a big carrot at Boeing for the 773 and a 50 ship 738 order for the best discounts.

And this passenger, who might be using the product, would much prefer to be on a 738 thank you very much.



Knowledge Replaces Fear
User currently offlineJlp123 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3349 times:

Concerning the number of A/C needed for their operation, I've read that they plan to purchase 30 and lease 20. This may be the source of the confusion, but it's definitely 50 planes.

User currently offlineRT514 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3290 times:

WHether he is or not, how will he be able to start an airline in the states without US citizenship?

One would not require citizenship. When it comes to immigration policies, there are several "ways in" concerning business, particularly when it comes to creating jobs and employing locals. Regulations concerning competition, foreign vs. domestic ownership reules, etc. are much more pertinent here than nationality.


I think he probably knows how to work Airbus and Boeing.

I think so too. Perhaps better than anyone else around.


User currently offlineS12PPL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2861 times:

I think Airbus offers a beter IFE situation than Boeing does, IF VUSA is planning to do a JetBlue and put PTV's in every seat. If VUSA wants IFE and a folding screen, well they could just go with either manufacturer. As much of a Boeing fan as I am....It would guess if they go with PTV's, Airbus will be announced....

25 Phxinterrupted : "For the passengers it's the best product, and for VS as well, since they are already an Airbus customer and might get discount on there future longha
26 Post contains images Scbriml : I would guess most American passengers would prefer a more reliable plane such as the 737NG over a 319/320. I would guess most American passengers wou
27 Dbo861 : "WHether he is or not, how will he be able to start an airline in the states without US citizenship?" That's why he's trying to find people to buy sha
28 Ken777 : When Branson started Virgin Blue in Australia he had no problems leasing 737s on a short term basis until Boeing could deliver the ones he ordered. Th
29 Post contains links Planemaker : This article was in today's the NY Times: Virgin U.S. head says new airline will be all-American Virgin Group's proposed new U.S. discount carrier wil
30 Aloha717200 : I'm thinking it will go to Airbus as well. As far as personal preference, depends really. If the choice is between the 738 or A320, I sure hope they g
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin USA To Order 50 Planes posted Mon May 24 2004 20:19:45 by HZ747300
Virgin USA Goes With Airbus posted Tue Apr 13 2004 18:54:33 by Wilco
Mexicana Close To Airbus Order posted Fri Aug 25 2006 03:37:57 by Manni
Final China Airbus Order Likely To Be Less posted Wed Dec 7 2005 01:06:44 by BoomBoom
What Ever Happened To Virgin USA? posted Sat Mar 12 2005 04:36:29 by Funflyer
Airbus Set For Virgin US Order posted Wed Apr 28 2004 09:30:20 by Kl911
Virgin USA Trying To Capture Delta's Fred Reid posted Tue Feb 24 2004 18:33:30 by Singapore_Air
Fred Reid To Virgin USA? posted Mon Feb 23 2004 00:12:34 by Deltaffindfw
Virgin USA To LAX? posted Sat Nov 29 2003 06:53:40 by FutureCEO
Virgin USA To Be Based In Philly posted Wed Nov 19 2003 21:50:23 by Kevin