Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Clumps Of Flights???  
User currently offlineFaunited7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 750 times:

I know this may sound stupid, especially comming from me, but I really want to ask it, so don't laugh!!! Yesterday (I had the day off), I went to IAD to take pictures. I went around 2. The airport was almost lifeless. No one was in a rush, nothing was happening real fast. So I waited (not many planes were there). I went to the screen. Almost all the flights were taking off between 4:15pm-5:55pm. All of the sudden, (at 3:35pm) the bulding filled up, along with most of the gates. Why would any airport want to do this. Wouldn't the smart thing be to spread out the flights so it is not so crampt and hectic?

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 750 times:

This is often done so that connections are easier for passengers. If all the flights come in and depart at about the same time frame, they do not have to wait long for their connecting flights, and they will not arrive just after a flight to their next destination has taken off.

User currently offlinePurdue Pilot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Each of these groups of flights are called a bank, and you will see them at all major hubs. Generally, there will be a bank of arrivals to bring connecting pasengers in, then a bank of departures to get them back out. This is the most efficient way of timing flights to allow the most possible connections.

User currently offlineFaunited7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Thank you for all your help. But why would anyone want quick connections? It makes you so much more stressfull! You have to like push people out of the way in the plane isles (you know it takes like 15 minutes to get out) then run through the terminal looking like a moron. But whatever!

User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 750 times:

There's nothing stupid in that question. Here in FAO we have the same problem.
If all the airlines want to operate between 1600 and 1800, the airport authority can't do nothing.
When there are no more slots available between that hours, then the airlines must operate in different hours.
It's normal here lifeless hours in the terminal and then, the buses with tourists from the hotels start arriving all at the same time and ofcourse, the check-in's and gates become extremely used.

Luis, Faro, Portugal


User currently offlineL1011 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1674 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 750 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I agree with FAunited7. When I am making a connection, I don't like to worry about either my luggage or me not making it if my inbound flight is a few minutes late. I like to be able to leisurely wander over to my next flight, maybe browsing through the airport shops along the way.

Bob Bradley
Richmond, VA



Fly Eastern's Golden Falcon DC-7B
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Technically you aren't supposed to be booked for a connection unless you have at least 45 minutes to make it.

But by the time you factor in the delays.......



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinePurdue Cadet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 750 times:

As passengers, it may be nice to have a liesurely connection (though I think many business travelers would disagree), but airlines are trying to do what works best for them. Having banks of flights allows them to offer the most possible city-pairs, because they aren't going to schedule a connection of 5 hours or anything, and they need to have their planes in the air as much as possible.

User currently offlineJetpilot From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3130 posts, RR: 29
Reply 8, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Planes don't like to fly alone. They travel in packs for safety.

User currently offlineLindy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Zach, you said that airport was lifeless at 2pm!!!!! I cant belive that. Only USAirways\USAirways Express and MetroJet had last saturday 86 flights between 2pm and 8:50pm!!!!! Thats where last plane was living (I'm talking about USAirways) flight 2761 to ATL. And after that flight we were waiting for Terminators (planes which are staying overnight), 10 big jets B737-200/300/400, DC-9, MD80, F100. Add United, they have around 100 flights between 2pm and 9pm!!! Lifeless? hehehehe You spent to much time in that model shop.

Rafal


User currently offlineDfw From United States of America, joined Sep 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (15 years 6 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Two words ladies and gentleman. BUSINESS TRAVELLERS. That is a big reason flights happen there. I fly on them everyday. In the U.S. the business traveller dictates what happens. Not the tourists or people like you and I. Another reason is that time frame is also when the international flights depart. Supply and demand. Simple as that. Cheers.

Ken


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lack Of Flights Linking Brazil - Ecuador posted Mon Feb 16 2009 05:32:07 by SJOtoLIR
Canceling Of Flights To TLV With Gaza Conflict posted Thu Jan 1 2009 14:06:08 by N104UA
Status Of Flights Into BOM posted Wed Nov 26 2008 14:33:56 by Globalflyer
Reduction Of Flights To Venezuela For US Airlines posted Mon Oct 27 2008 22:09:03 by Mariodgf
DL Cutting 23% Of Flights From CVG posted Wed Jul 9 2008 15:11:40 by Skibum9
Virgin Blue Vs Pacific Blue Naming Of Flights? posted Sun May 18 2008 16:17:48 by REALDEAL
Another Cool Video Of Flights To/From USA posted Fri May 16 2008 07:54:25 by PC12Fan
MAN Fuel Shortage Risks Cancellation Of Flights posted Fri Apr 4 2008 10:17:31 by OA260
UA -RJs/UAX 57% Of Flights, Just 18% Of Revenue posted Mon Sep 3 2007 06:02:36 by Iaddca
Ryanair # Of Flights Versus Iberia posted Thu Jul 26 2007 10:41:10 by Singel09