Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Madrid  
User currently offlineBullpitt From Spain, joined Mar 2004, 871 posts, RR: 8
Posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 6766 times:

Hi all

Has anybody any information about how Air Madrid is doing? I know they have just started but I'm curious about how their flights are doing load wise and are they flying to schedule.

Un Saludo a todos


These are my principles but if you don't like them I have others
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6678 times:

There were reports that they will serve some resorts/cities in Egypt. Is there any more info on that?


EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineSoAmSky From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6672 times:

Hi Bullpit

I've read they have had lots of problems in Colombia. It seems Avianca wants Air Madrid out since they're threatening one of Avianca's most lucrative routes.

Air Madrid have already made clear that if Colombian aeronautical authority have not granted all the required permanent permits to fly the CTG-BOG route by the end of this month, they would quit flying there and take the business somewhere else.

Regards



Soar the blue of the South American Sky
User currently offlineJuanr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6658 times:

Hi!

Yes SoAmSky that is the truth, the problem is that the bilateral agreement between Colombia and Spain says that there will be 14X week non-stop flights between the countries (currently operated by Avianca 7x and Iberia 7x) and there is a chance of 3 more weekly flights if they operate through Cartagena and with tourism porpoises.

So, when Air Madrid announced the flights to Colombia they were requested to stop in CTG and they agreed, but the intention was to create a tourism market for CTG so a lot of money would remain in Colombia and Iberia and Avianca would not be affected by the new company.

Now, Air Madrid started selling tickets only in Spain at a very low prices and of course Avianca was very terrified with the idea of losing a lot of their market, that went worse when it was announced that the flight route was MAD-BOG-CTG-MAD; Civil Authority in Colombia did not authorized Air Madrid selling tickets in Colombia (their fares are lower than required for the route) So Avianca said: they are looking for the Ethnic market (Colombians living in Spain) and not for Spanish Tourists and requested to deny they authorization.

So everybody was eyed wide open when their first flight arrived and the fact is that Avianca was right there were 285 passengers on that flight, 210 got off in BOG and only 75 in Cartagena, so immediately the Aeronautica Civil ordered that the flight had to stop in CTG before BOG and Air Madrid CEO jumped out of his seat saying that they are being prosecuted by Colombian authorities and he gave Colombian Authorities 15 days to solve their problems and authorize operation or they'll stop flying to the country. Of course Aeronautica Civil will decide according to our laws what to do with Air Madrid.

Given those facts, I think is better for them to leave.

Juan
SKBO


User currently offlineSoAmSky From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 6643 times:

Hi Juan

" Given those facts, I think is better for them to leave"

Do you think it's better for Air Madrid to leave because they have been given many problems or because you think Air Madrid is not playing a fair game?

I read Air Madrid have shown the Civil Authority how they've come up with their fares. They stated also that since the beginning they made clear they wanted and needed to fly to BOG since Cartagena doesn't have enough market to support a transcontinental flight. However, even with fewer pax to CTG, if the tourist industry does well in this historic city, word of mouth would bring more tourist there.

Regards



Soar the blue of the South American Sky
User currently offlineJuanr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 6622 times:

Hi SoAmSky

Yes, I think they are not playing a fair game, unfortunately Avianca has notbeen able to play the game the way they should, they are like crying babies right now; I would love to see a commercial ad saying something like "A ten hours flight to Madrid with no free food service, no way!, you better fly with AV" or "Better keep flying with tradition and without paying 17.00 Euro for your food" things like that.

Of course they needed to fly to BOG beacuse the only foreign city that can handle a flight to CTG would be MIA and of course it is really hard to get a ticket on AV or IB to go to MAD from BOG; the thing is that right now you can't buy a ticket on Air Madrid if you live in Colombia; that means that the airline is making profit of a market that is underserved, using Colombians (there are more than 500.000 living in Spain as a target) as a target, competing with almost "dumping" prices with AV, every euro remains in Spain, and when the Colombian Aeronautica Civil make some requests they reply with an ultimatum; so... certainly they are not playing fare and they should leave.

Juan
SKBO


User currently offlineSoAmSky From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 6600 times:

Hi Juan, think about it!

Avianca is going to be purchased by either synergy (Brazil) or Copa/Continental (Panama/USA), so euros wouldn't remain in Colombia either. Why do Colombians in Spain have to pay the high fares Avianca and Iberia usually charge?

Another question, wasn't Colombia-Spain one of the routes proto airline Fenix was seeking to start operations? What does this incident could mean to it?

Regards



Soar the blue of the South American Sky
User currently offlineSumma767 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2569 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 6559 times:

SoAmSky,
Fenix did ask for MAD as a destination, but this was not granted to them by Aeronautica. The reasons being the same restrictions contained in the bilateral agreement that now are troubling Air Madrid. Fenix have been granted authorization to fly to London, Paris, Frankfurt and Rome as European destinations.

The public audience for the approval or otherwise of Air Madrid is expected to be held on 22nd June. We will know then what will happen.
My guess is that some compromise will be reached.

What is clear is that Air Madrid did not do their homework properly or sorted out the legal issues in time. Colombia is a very legalistic country and the airline seems to have come in with a neo-colonial attitude.

Having said that, I do hope that they stay. It can only be in the interest of tourism (even if it's not immediate!) and a little healthy competition would not go amiss. BOG is a cash cow for Iberia at the moment. Not so much for Avianca. As Air Madrid's CEO said.. He can fly 300 pax on his A330s (which he called the jewel of aviation) on $31000 of fuel. Avianca carries 165 pax (175 seats but 10 fully reclining ones must be left available for the crew) on a 762 that according to him spends $60000 in fuel on the same route.

Do these figures make sense?

Kindest regards


User currently offlineSoAmSky From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 6475 times:

Hi Summa767

It's a pity that in such underserved segment, bilateral agreements limit competition. I do think that if Fenix begins operations, it would do really well offering a superb and competitive product on that route.

Regards



Soar the blue of the South American Sky
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 6399 times:

So nobody knows any info on flights to Egypt (Sharm El Sheikh, Luxor, etc)?


EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineKomododx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6393 times:

Since some of you mentioned Fenix, what's the status of that operation?

KdX in TLH


User currently offlineRCS763av From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4396 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 6323 times:

Fenix will start service in Oct/Nov this year with 757s, later they will acquire 767s for Europe routes.

User currently offlineSwissBrazil From Switzerland, joined Jul 2003, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 6 months 6 days ago) and read 6227 times:

Hello guys,

I just bought on their homepage 2 tickets MAD-GIG on Air Madrid for the coming 29.June! Does anyone knows if I can reserve the seats in advance, and if the inflight service (food and drinks) have all to be paid for? If so, am I allowed to bring my own food with me?

Hope to have nice flight  Wink/being sarcastic

Regards,
Fred


User currently offlineSumma767 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2569 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 6180 times:

About the food, you have to pay for it! The menu is actually on Air Madrid's website. €5 for a starter, €10 for a main course and €2 for a drink. It looks quite appetizing actually.
There is no information on bringing your own food. But I don't imagine that anybody will bat an eyelid if you take a sandwich onboard.


User currently offlineDebonair From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 2468 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 6159 times:


@SwissBrazil

Can I ask you, how much did you paied??? I am looking forward to your trip-report  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

@Summa767
Do you have a direct link to the meals??


User currently offlineDebonair From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 2468 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 6119 times:


One more question: Do you have also to pay the meals in the Biz Class???


User currently offlineSwissBrazil From Switzerland, joined Jul 2003, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 6 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6050 times:

Summa767: Thks! I did try it on their website, but just got empty pages when it came down to food info.. hmm, so I'm taking a couple of sandwiches with me  Wink/being sarcastic

Debonair: I paid for a return MAD-GIG-MAD 417EUR all tax incl, basic ticket was 329EUR+all tax comes to 417EUR... in July the prices go up for good, that's why I booked for the 29th now  Wink/being sarcastic

Will make a trip report, and place some pic's here  Wink/being sarcastic

Rgds,
Fred


User currently offline767-332ER From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2030 posts, RR: 10
Reply 17, posted (10 years 6 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5989 times:

Air Madrid CEO jumped out of his seat saying that they are being prosecuted by Colombian authorities and he gave Colombian Authorities 15 days to solve their problems and authorize operation or they'll stop flying to the country
Who does he think he is, God? So stop flying to Colombia, big deal. OBEY THE RULES!!!



Twinjets...if one fails, work the other one twice as hard!!!
User currently offlineJuanr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 6 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5935 times:

According with an Interview on W Radio Bogotá last friday Air Madrid has not yet rights to fly scheduled flights to Colombia, they are authorized to fly charter flights on June and July; the status of those charter flights was MAD-CTG-BOG-CTG-MAD on tuesdays and MAD-CTG-MAD on fridays, well, on that interview Air Madrid's CEO announced they will stop flying the Friday frecuency because it is not profitable (what they are really looking at is BOG market), and Director of Aeronautica Civil Colombiana announced that on June 23 will be held the public hearing to discuss the convinience of Air Madrid operation; perhaps the ACC will anounce that 70%-80% of Air Madrid passengers has to have CTG as final destination in Colombia (according with the bilateral agreement)

Who does he think he is, God?
No, I do not think he thinks is god, he is an Spainsh investor in Latin America so perhaps he thinks he is in "La Reconquista", Some Spanish investors still look at Latin American countries as their colonies

Juan
SKBO


User currently offlineSwissBrazil From Switzerland, joined Jul 2003, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 6 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5849 times:

I whish them all the best actually, it's very good to finally see some competition down in South America.. I'm looking forward to my flight to GIG next week with them  Wink/being sarcastic

User currently offlineRojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2482 posts, RR: 9
Reply 20, posted (10 years 6 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 5818 times:

No, I do not think he thinks is god, he is an Spainsh investor in Latin America so perhaps he thinks he is in "La Reconquista", Some Spanish investors still look at Latin American countries as their colonies

Can you explain why you say that Spanish investors look at Latin American countries as their colonies?? I don't see anything wrong in trying to do business in a place were there is a clear lack of them... it is obvious that there is a need for additional flights MAD-BOG-MAD and people are tired of paying so much money to fly IB or AV. I can bet that 80% of the passengers on Air Madrid flights are Colombians traveling home or Spain and not Spanish traveling to Colombia or back home. Then, blame your country and your government for not realizing that their nationals need more flights to MAD. Air Madrid is just trying to do business as any carrier would. We are in the 21st century and sooner or later countries will have to negotiate open skies agreements between them. Protecting national airlines will only make them more vulnerable to future competition. You can not protect an airline forever!!


User currently offlineMiaskies From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 1348 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (10 years 6 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 5815 times:

Any word on Air Madrid serving any U.S. Destinations? MIA? JFK?
Glad to see another Spanish Carrier take to the Skies...and cross the pond.



Nothing better than making love at 35K Feet!
User currently offlineSumma767 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2569 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (10 years 6 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5798 times:

Can you explain why you say that Spanish investors look at Latin American countries as their colonies??

Air Madrid's lower cost approach to flights across the Atlantic is very welcome. However, they seem to have taken for granted that there are regulations and processes that must be followed.

In the case of Colombia, at least, Air Madrid left it very late to get this process started, and now seem to be using "bully" tactics to get what they want. There lies the neo-colonial attitude.

Colombia's civil aviation authority are only adhering to the bilateral agreement and following normal procedures that include a public audience. All being well, tomorrow we will have a positive decision.

And as for regulation, I agree that national airlines cannot be overprotected. But at the same time in countries where airlines are essentially a public service, the long term interest of passengers must be looked after.


User currently offlineRojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2482 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (10 years 6 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 5772 times:

In the case of Colombia, at least, Air Madrid left it very late to get this process started, and now seem to be using "bully" tactics to get what they want. There lies the neo-colonial attitude.

Air Madrid just wants to be profitable and they are trying to get into a good business by flying to Bogota (feasible flight) but pleasing the Colombian government (to get their schedule operations approved) and extending the flight to Cartagena (unfeasible flight). They are just claiming that the market is the one deciding on the mix of people that each flight will have. It is obvious that if the Colombian government denies 3rd freedom rights to Air Madrid on BOG-MAD and schedule flights are not approved, they will have to pull from Colombia. Nobody will keep a Cartagena flight from Europe... Additionally, "Bully" Tactics is not a neo-colonial attitude, it is how business is done in Latin America. I haven't been to Colombia, but I have been to many other countries in Latin America and "Bully" Tactics is our way of living and our way of doing business... so please don't say that they have a neo-colonial attitude when our countries are the ones who make them act like that by not setting the terms in first place. The Colombian government should have denied Air Madrid flights from the very beginning by not authorizing the charter flights with a stop in BOG... but they were also thinking with this "Bully" tactic perspective: lets authorize them charters and see if we can get what we want (bring tourism to Colombia) knowing that it is impossible to fill an airplane to Europe - Cartagena. And, in the meantime, we will authorize them a stop in BOG, but if they start selling too many tickets to BOG, we stop the charters and do not authorize schedule flights...


And as for regulation, I agree that national airlines cannot be overprotected. But at the same time in countries where airlines are essentially a public service, the long term interest of passengers must be looked after.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that airlines are a public service in almost every country where people can buy a ticket on any airline as long as they have money... although in some countries (specially in Latin America) they are a very expensive public service. And I don't see how overprotection can help in the long term interest of passengers. It has been proved that overprotection only generates inefficient services with very high prices. Additionally, most passengers are price sensitive, because we have poverty in our contries, so I don't see how overprotecting the market and generating high prices is in the long term interest of passegers. It is in the long term interest of premium passengers but not of all passengers...


User currently offlineSumma767 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2569 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (10 years 6 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5740 times:

Rojo:
If Air Madrid had done its homework, it would have realised that approval of a route requires more than a week. Other airlines seem to manage to apply in time.

If they looked properly at the bilateral agreement they would have seen that any further access to BOG requires a CTG, ADZ or SMR stop. Similarly Colombian carriers would have to stop in the Canaries for more access to MAD. It's not a one sided thing! If the bilateral agreement needs changing, then they can lobby their government (After all, Colombia does have open skies agreements with many countries). What they cannot do is go about trying to re-write it in their own way.


I do trust that Air Madrid will be given approval tomorrow (with a stop as required by the bilateral). And furthermore, that they will be able to sell seats for flights originating in Colombia.

About regulation: Colombia's civil aviation authority has a clear policy of allowing as much competition so long as it can be supported. It wants to keep an equilibrium. It allows a number of flights and airlines between pairs of cities according to how many pax are carried. What it does not want to see is competing that would end up with airlines going bust, and therefore less choice in the long term for the consumer.

I don't necessarily agree. I know that the market should decide, but aviation is a tricky business.


25 Planeguy : Summa767, Do you know with which countries Colombia has open skies agreements? I'm just curious
26 Post contains links Summa767 : Colombia has open skies agreements with Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile and Mexico. The first two include limitless 5th freedom rights. With
27 Juanr : Well, according to Colombian National Newspaper "El Tiempo" finally the Colombian Aeronautica Civil has decided that Air Madrid has the right to opera
28 MAH4546 : Any word on Air Madrid serving any U.S. Destinations? MIA? JFK? Glad to see another Spanish Carrier take to the Skies...and cross the pond. By the tim
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Future Of Air Madrid posted Tue Oct 31 2006 03:19:49 by TACAA320
Air Madrid- 20 Hours For MAD-PMI.... posted Mon Oct 30 2006 14:23:26 by Beaucaire
Air Madrid MIA/LAX Update posted Sat Oct 28 2006 23:34:23 by MAH4546
Air Madrid B737-400 posted Thu Oct 26 2006 15:14:27 by RAFVC10
Air Madrid Problems? posted Thu Oct 5 2006 06:47:30 by Iberia340600
Air Madrid CR1's! posted Mon Sep 18 2006 21:14:47 by RAFVC10
Air Madrid To LAX, MIA? posted Sat Sep 16 2006 22:23:44 by Oakjam
Air Madrid Engine #2 Explosion During Takeoff UIO posted Sun Jul 16 2006 05:27:22 by Airportmanager
Air Madrid To Fly MIA-BCN posted Wed Jul 12 2006 18:17:12 by MAH4546
Air Madrid And Lufthansa Deal On Cargo Capacity posted Wed Jul 5 2006 12:28:11 by Beaucaire