Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lufthansa: Munich Or Frankfurt?  
User currently offlineFlymunich From Germany, joined Mar 2004, 171 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3329 times:

Lufthansa hopes to gain competitive advantage with A380s
Dateline: Friday June 18, 2004

Lufthansa Group Chairman and CEO Wolfgang Mayrhuber believes his airline will enjoy a significant competitive advantage when its A380s begin arriving in a few years.

LH has ordered 15 plus 15 options. "I believe on the trunk routes to our hubs at Frankfurt and Munich, other carriers with smaller airplanes on the same sector will have to reduce their capacity," Mayrhuber explaned to ATWOnline during a Star Alliance meeting in Singapore. "The A380 offers 25% less production costs compared to A340s, 17% less compared to 747s. Other carriers cannot maintain against our A380s."
He also believes that with its lower seat-mile costs, Lufthansa will be able to charge less for a ticket should it become necessary.

Frankfurt Airport already is able to handle the 555-seater but LH wants to rebuild some gates to deliver "a more passenger-friendly boarding" process. The A380s also may be deployed at Munich, the fastet-growing hub anywhere in Europe, where LH this summer is offering 2,300 weekly flights to 100 destinations--50% more than in summer 2003. At Munich, "we could bring all our new capacity on the market without losing yield," Mayrhuber added.



11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4696 posts, RR: 42
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3275 times:

If I take the airside capacity restrains in F R A into account, which will last at least until a new fourth runway will be opened in 2009/10 (IF it will eventually be built), I have my doubts that F R A will not see the majority of LH'S A380 operations.

It should be clear, however, that Lufthansa's main growth will most likely occur in MUC in the meantime. If you compare the traffic figures for these two hubs, MUC has still a long way to go until it reaches the same importance like F R A.

BTW - you forgot to mention whether the A380's will have PTV's installed for our a.net teeny bopper fraction. Big grin





Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1107 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3209 times:

I think that most 380s will be stationed in F R A. It is a good possibility to increase pax numbers without adding slots.

User currently offlineWdleiser From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 962 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2991 times:

"If I take the airside capacity restrains in F R A into account, which will last at least until a new fourth runway will be opened in 2009/10 (IF it will eventually be built), I have my doubts that F R A will not see the majority of LH'S A380 operations.

It should be clear, however, that Lufthansa's main growth will most likely occur in MUC in the meantime. If you compare the traffic figures for these two hubs, MUC has still a long way to go until it reaches the same importance like F R A.

BTW - you forgot to mention whether the A380's will have PTV's installed for our a.net teeny bopper fraction "

Frankfurt is getting the Airbase back from the USA in 2006/2007. I am very sad about this too because my plan was to Join Airforce, fly C17's at Rhein/Main and learn German, fly for Lufthansa and eventually captain their A380.
Now when I join Airforce I will have to go with Rammstein.

And of course, Knowing its Lufthansa, as of right now we could all make a good bet that they wont have PTV's =)



User currently offlineAirconti From Germany, joined Jun 2004, 148 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2801 times:

Well, from my point of view, LH might easily move long-range ops from AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA to MUC - mainly by a change from 747 to A34x,their Main Hub is still AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA - therefore I cannot imagine, we will see regular services of A380 in MUC. We still have no regular LH B744 Service in MUC - so there's no sense to upgrade to A380.
I think, LH will move some services from AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA to MUC for addl. Slots for A380 in AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA.
OTOH-all bepends on the legal story with having A380 maintenance in AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA or MUC - if court says AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA is out of bounds, the situation for MUC might be different.....


User currently offlineVS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2756 times:

I am no fan of LH but I will admit it that their strategy to develop MUC is a very smart one, and will make LH bigger and stronger. Unlike British Airways who are constrained at LHR, which stifles their growth, LH dealt with the problem of bottleneck airport in a radical and succesful way. LH is a boring airline to fly but it is smartly run - can't deny it.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Regards,
vs11



User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3492 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2659 times:


Palma de Mallorca (PMI) and Antalya (AYT) should get ready for the A380...


User currently offlineSteph001 From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 315 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2657 times:

I guess the A380 will replace some B747 on the routes where they have exceeding demand. This could mean that LH locates the A380 there where it has the B747. I don't know whether some of Lufthansa's B747 are stationed in MUC, but it is for sure that they are extending the hangars in AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA to allow for the A380. My guess is thus that the A380 will be stationed in AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA, at least for the beginning. This could also mean that MUC will get some B747 from AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA.

User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3492 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2633 times:


AFAIK,Lufthansa does not operate 747s out of MUC and so it does not need to base any there.B747s fly out of Frankfurt only.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8037 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

I think the route between AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA and SFO will be switched to the A380-800 as soon as there are enough planes to cover this route. Ever try to get a ticket on this route? Good luck!  Smile And that's with LH flying the 747-400, too.

User currently offlineMUCFLYER From Germany, joined May 2004, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 2399 times:

Sorry, pax or yield isn't the point. One of the most important reasons for LH to cut the B744 flights out of Munich, was the fact that LH wanted to base only Cockpit Crews for the Airbus Family in Munich.
(MUC-LAX and MUC-SFO with B744 according passenger load was very successful in the past. The A340-600 now to SFO -just 45 seats less than the B744- is also always full or almost full)
For B744 longdistance flights out of Munich, Crews had to proceed 'dead head' the day before departure in MUC from Frankfurt to Munich with an overnight in the hotel, dueto duty times. Just to expensive.
There are severals scenarios which have been discussed for the future:
One of them ist to base also some of the new A380 in Munich because there will be no problems with cockpit and cabin crews.
Another one is to base all A380 in AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA, and change several longhaul flights to B744 out of MUC, together with cockpit crews which have to be based in MUC.

We will see, but i am very sure that some routes will operate with an A380 out of Munich in the future. Don't forget... Munich was the FIRST Airport in Europe with an fully certificate for the A380 operation  Big grin
And Mr. Kerkloh the chairman of Munich Airport offers Lufthansa the possibility to become quick and easily a brand new or an remodeled Hangar for the A380  Smile
but for sure... AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA wil see the most A380 flights

regards


User currently offlineLuxair66 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2227 times:

I flew in and out of Munich every week during the second half of 2003, I never saw a single LH 744 the whole time I was there. Plenty of A340's though.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lufthansa Munich-San Francisco. 340 Or 747? posted Sun Jun 16 2002 14:34:12 by F.pier
Lufthansa: July2'06 Frankfurt-Athens, What Plane? posted Wed Apr 26 2006 18:48:34 by Boeing777/747
Lufthansa's Munich Hub posted Sun Dec 26 2004 14:30:15 by ContinentalEWR
Lufthansa 343 Or 744 Or United 777 On IAD-FRA posted Fri Mar 19 2004 23:01:24 by FlightLover
Lufthansa A340 Or What's Left Of It, Lands In IAH posted Thu Aug 7 2003 03:27:46 by Artsyman
Lufthansa Technik At Frankfurt posted Thu Jan 9 2003 13:15:58 by Airways
Orly, Zurich Or Frankfurt? posted Sun Feb 20 2000 20:28:39 by Gardermoen
Northwest, Lufthansa, USAir Or Delta ? posted Thu Jan 27 2000 16:46:04 by USAir
Lufthansa On Detroit - Frankfurt posted Fri Jul 23 1999 20:35:37 by DeltaShuttle
Did Lufthansa Ever Own Any 757s Or 767s? posted Wed Jul 12 2006 07:08:54 by Lenbrazil