Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
KLM 744 Makes Fuel Stop AMS-LAX  
User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1924 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 8267 times:

I was wondering what the reason was for a KLM 744 to stop for refueling today. The flight was KLM 601 AMS-LAX, and the aircraft was PH-BFD with 275 pax on board. It stopped in GEG for a "delayed fuel stop" and arrived at LAX at 3:30pm or so. Thanks!


My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRobNL From Netherlands, joined Jun 2004, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 7985 times:

It has probably been due to the weather conditions in The Netherlands on June 23/24: very strong winds (up to 29m/s) with heavy gusts and rain.
KL601 might have had to change it's routing to avoid the storm system as much as possible.

All intra-European KLM flights were loaded with extra fuel to be able to stay up in the air an additional 30 minutes in case they needed to hold or divert.

greetz,
Rob

[Edited 2004-06-25 10:52:43]

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 7820 times:

Also possible it took off with a reduced fuel load to enable it to climb over the weather as quickly as possible.
The resulting reduced range could have necessitated a fuelstop.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineJmc1975 From Israel, joined Sep 2000, 3253 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5789 times:

GEG is a rather strange choice for such a diversion. One would expect a place like SEA, YVR or YYC which often sees heavies. Did they refuel on a remote pad?


.......
User currently offlineGrude1087 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 50 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 5450 times:

GEG would seem logical from a route standpoint, but could it also be because landing fees would be significantly less than at SEA or YVR?

User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 5371 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

wow that would have been a site!

User currently offlineNWA757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 172 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 5143 times:

Very unusual event. It has probably been due to the weather conditions in The Netherlands on June 23/24: very strong winds (up to 29m/s) with heavy gusts and rain. GEG seems a logical stop to me! Wish I was @ GEG to see it.



Fly High!
User currently offlineLegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2054 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4950 times:

I am assuming that the weather was the reason for KLM to cancel their flight into SFO yesterday? Today, 6/25, they flew in a 747-400.


John@SFO
User currently offlineSquirrel83 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4856 times:

GEG? That just doesnt sound right .

If so all I can say is WOW. . That has got to be the first 747 to land there in years.

Anyone got pictures of this? It would be quite amazing. .

KL601 Amsterdam Schiphol to Los Angeles - International
From/to Actual Status
Amsterdam Schiphol 25Jun 11:49 Departed
Los Angeles - International 25Jun 13:38 Arrived

[Edited 2004-06-26 01:03:26]

User currently offlineGeg2rap From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 848 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4580 times:

there was a korean 747 in geg earlier this year I think or late last year, there is a pic on a.net

User currently offlineNorthwest 777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days ago) and read 4429 times:

My dad works on the groud crew for NW in GEG. He said it caused a bit of excitement around there for those who haven't seen or worked on a widebody jet before (besides the Fed Ex A300s). It had hardcore headwinds and the decision was made over Calgary that they would stop in Spokane for fuel. They choose Spokane because it is a Northwest station and it would be easier to fill up using the Northwest account for Jet fuel.

Being that no one had any stairs that coud reach the plane, they had to use the jetway which caused some problems for 2 Southwest 737s and an America West 737 that had to pull into their gates VERY carefully as their wings had to go under the 744's wings, almost glancing an engine in one situation. If one of the WN 737s had been a new 700 with winglets, they would have been out of luck parking.

Also, the plane stayed on the ground longer than expected due to the start valve on the no.1 engine being stuck closed, and had to be opened manually while the pilots started up the engine, and then manually close the valve again. The only option for reaching the engine was to have a mechanic come out and stand on a NW belt loader with a rachet and about 15 extensions on it to reach the start valve. Once the start valve was opened and the engine was started, my dad and a couple other ramp rats had to make sure the mechanic didn't get blown right off the beltloader before closing the valve again.

NOW THE FUN PART! My dad was the only one for NW with experience working on widebodies so he had to show everyone how to hook up the towbar and push that beast back. BUT, the plane now had the no. 1 engine going, and NW's payloader didn't have enough power to push back the plane by itself, so after a little time to figure out what to do, they called over a Southwest employee and they used the WN payloader to push the NW payloader pushing the 747. My old man says it was a bit tricky considering they had to push it all the way out onto the main taxiway around a couple sharp corners, in order to give it the room it needed. Like my dad said, it gave a little excitement to the workday.

BTW, Spokane used to get a bunch of NW DC-10s back in the 80s and even a couple 747s on diversions, but the difference now is that there are more gates at the terminal now, thus causing a bit of a problem for a couple southwest pilots trying to taxi in.
GOOD TIMES!

[Edited 2004-06-26 02:30:35]

User currently offlinePolnebmit From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 99 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4169 times:

Now that's a story!! Did anyone take any pictures???

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4038 times:

I think everyone was too busy servicing an aircraft that's 3 times the size of the normal traffic to have any time to use a camera (at least they should have been...)  Laugh out loud


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineBronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 810 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3768 times:

Wasn't Air Force One in Spokane with President Bush last week? Or did he land at Fairchild AFB, and not GEG?


Jet City Aviation Photography
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9495 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

Bush visited Fairchild. GEG over SEA is an interesting decision. It cannot handle the widebodies like SEA and PDX can, but it is far less crowded and busy. GEG would have been a better place for a short stop, but it provided an interesting story, however not as interesting as a 777 in Yellowknife Canada.


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineVirgin747 From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3573 times:

There was a 744 in YWG flying the same route on June 6. During the airshow. Theres pics of it somewhere...

User currently offlineNorthwest 777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3542 times:

Well, unfortunately none of the employees that my dad knows of got any pictures, but he said a heck of a lot of passengers who knew enough to know that this big old bird wasn't a regular, took a bunch of pictures.

BTW, my dad said the 744 had KLM Asia titles on it.


User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1924 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3522 times:

Here is a pic of PH-BFD. No photos of it at GEG as of yet.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Hisham Atallah




My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
KLM 744 Ever Non-stop SXM-AMS? posted Tue Feb 28 2006 00:11:25 by Mozart
BUR-OAK...with A Fuel Stop At LAX?! posted Mon Nov 29 2004 01:11:23 by Skycruiser
US PLS-CLT Makes Fuel Stop Today posted Sun Mar 9 2003 19:36:19 by MAH4546
KL691 AMS-Toronto Fuel Stop At MAN posted Wed Oct 25 2006 17:10:31 by Oly720man
Official: KLM 6 Weekly Non-stop AMS-LIM posted Wed Sep 13 2006 17:56:12 by KLMCedric
KLM Uses 744 Instead Of 74E To LAX In March! Why? posted Sat Feb 12 2005 16:12:28 by KLMCedric
Reg Number Of KLM Plane AMS-LAX posted Sun Mar 28 2004 07:08:12 by Carpatica
LAX Is Fuel Stop For What Int'l Airlines To Where? posted Tue Feb 4 2003 17:30:02 by DIA
Window Arrangement on KLM 744 posted Wed Aug 2 2006 21:35:31 by LawrenceMck
KLM 744 Wants To Sunbathe On Maho Beach posted Wed Jul 19 2006 13:28:03 by Darrenthe747