Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ATA Want CGN; No USA Gateway Mentioned  
User currently offlineFlyCMH From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 2277 posts, RR: 10
Posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4123 times:

It appears that ATA Airlines would like to have Cologne-Bonn as the carrier's first scheduled transatlatic city. The article does not mention where in the U.S. the proposed flight/s would depart:

http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040625/airlines_ata_europe_1.html

[Edited 2004-06-25 17:38:53]

37 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4692 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4072 times:

This will become interesting. You can expect LTU and Lufthansa (through their affiliate Condor) to react on ATA's plans once they should become reality.

From my personal point of view, only serving big gateway cities with a high potential for both business and leisure passengers would make sense. So I expect either EWR or JFK to be among the candidates on the US side.



Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4045 times:

This is one of good service to CGN first one service to Europe flight.

User currently offlinePHLBOS From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7507 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3967 times:

The article also doesn't mention what type of equipment (plane) will TZ use for these future flights.

Will TZ use 753s or bring a few L-1011s out of retirement?



"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3944 times:

ATA's entry into the low-cost transatlantic market will certainly be interesting, and will cause other carriers to react. Cologne is mentioned as the first city, and ATA plans to serve 2 or 3 additional cities in europe according to the article. My guess is that most flights to Europe will be on ATA 757-200s, which have adequate range to fly from the NE United States to northern Europe. The 752s have a good amount of seats that will not be difficult to fill up and very low operating costs.....both important for a low cost operation. Unless ATA can keep the costs down and all of the seats filled up, the low transatlantic fares that they plan to offer will result in losses for the airline.

Gateways are likely to be cities like EWR, BOS or Baltimore, I would image we will see routings like Midway-Newark-Cologne or Indidanpolis-Baltimore-Cologne, to tie the international services into ATA's domestic route system. A guess, but I think that will be the logic.

The question is how other carriers will react.....Lufthansa will certainly do something, they are already in the process of re-lauching the Condor brand and plan to make that division into a low-cost carrier instead of exclusively a charter airline.

LCC on the atlantic.....let the games begin.


User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3773 times:

I remembered many years ago. Lufthansa used be nonstop scheduled flight JFK-CGN on an A300 or A310. I'm not sure about that. I remembered they used to have service for a short term. They dropped service due lack of service. Am I right?


Big777jet



User currently offline7E72004 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3587 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3743 times:

Is there an airport that is logical on the east coast that ATA could use w/o encountering much resistance in terms of competition? Seems like the new york airports have a lot of service to europe.


The next generation of aircraft is just around the corner!
User currently offlineGLAGAZ From UK - Scotland, joined Feb 2004, 1982 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3734 times:

In an e-mail i got from ATA they mentioned CGN, Shannon and GLA. Would condor compete with ATA on the route to CGN?


Neutrality means that u don't really care cos the struggle goes on even when ur not there, blind and unaware
User currently offlineATA767 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 419 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3608 times:

It really can not be done from MDW because of the fuel requirement and runway capacity. Germans want to go to NY or FL. That leave EWR,BOS, PIE or MCO as possible launch cities however the FL cities really could not support a non-stop in both directions. I would say the should launch it from EWR and have a few feeder flight from EWR to PIE, MCO, MDW, CLT, LAS and IND. Thats my 2 cents.

User currently offlineATAIndy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 591 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

I just wish ATA will have some transatlantic flights originating in Indy. It's about time for Indy to get a transatlantic flight.


Boiler up!
User currently offlineLambertMan From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2070 posts, RR: 36
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3559 times:

Think about the destination...

What city is ATA already in that could support such a destination?

EWR


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24725 posts, RR: 46
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3546 times:

From what I understand ATA initially is looking at one continental airport and one UK airport to serve in the begining.

For the US gateway last I heard the choices were, BWI, a NYC airport, and BOS.

While the both NYC and BOS would face competition from both US carriers and host of foreign carriers, ATA would pretty much have BWI to itself as there is very little scheduled Trans Atlantic service from the facility. In addition ATA has a good size set up at BWI as it operated AMC military charters at the airport on near daily basis.




From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3520 times:

I understand with the situation about TZ want service to CGN with B757. It should need to make better way for them. The choices is good for service out of MDW.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3502 times:

Baltimore is a great idea, but you'd be hard pressed to serve Cologne with a 757 from Baltimore.

N


User currently offlinePanAmerican From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 384 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3307 times:

Well, I certainly hope they'll send their good old L1011s, but I doubt it  Sad :

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Shawn Byers
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Shawn Byers


A flight from CGN to BWI would be great!
As they are talking about more European destinations, how about STN as a possibility, that would be a good base for low-cost operations.

I do believe that ATA did have scheduled transatlantic traffic before though. I think in the mid 1990s they flew to Ireland and on to Riga in Latvia with 757s and TriStars. I don't remember what the gateway city in the US was though.
I think it was JFK. Anybody remember that?

 Smile/happy/getting dizzyPA




Pan Am - The World's Most Experienced Airline.
User currently offlineGodbless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2752 posts, RR: 16
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3279 times:

ATA has been mentioned before in various articles on German forums and also in German newspapers, so to be honest I´m not that surprised... But after all it´s good to see this message come from the other side of the pond.
No matter what Lufthansa/Condor or LTU will do, I guess that CGN has a winner here. It is said that LTU wants to start operations to NY [again] next year so this might have to do with the fact that CGN is becoming a real competion to DUS [from where LTU operates it´s longhauls].

Well if you ask me, CGN is by far more attractive to me than DUS. Just found proof of that yesterday when I flew to MAD from DUS.

Max


User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3010 times:

PanAmerican-

You remembered correctly.
This would not be ATAs first attempt at service to Europe.
During the summer of 1994, ATA flew JFK to Belfast, Northern Ireland, continuing on for Riga Latvia. Tickets could be purchased to Belfast, but traffic mostly went on to Riga.
Twice a week, WED and SAT, returned on THU and SUN
They used AA's gates at JFK and operated the route with the Tristar.
Service lasted only for that summer season.
If memory serves me correctly, more than half the seats were purchased by a tour company specializing in travel to Russia. It may even have been a Russian/Latvian company. Independence was quite fresh at the time.



Delete this User
User currently offlinePanAmerican From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 384 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2976 times:

Thanks for confirming that, Stirling. Honestly, with such a strange routing, no wonder that didn't work out.
I'm just hoping they'll do better this time with their second attempt at transatlantic service. I'll be excited to hear about the details of this new service, especially from where it will be operating. If they'll offer fares of $100+tax there is no question I'll give them a try  Big thumbs up

By the way, in my opinion ATA's old livery (as posted by me above) was a great classic, too bad they had to replace it with the modern crap.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzyPA

[Edited 2004-06-26 18:31:56]


Pan Am - The World's Most Experienced Airline.
User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1102 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2954 times:

It's gonna be tight to fly the 757 from NYC or BWI to CGN. CO used to fly from EWR to DUS with the 752 and they had some diversions because of the fuel capacity.
So if they will use the 757 my guess is BOS because German tourists love to visit New England and they could use some feeder flights to other popular destinations.


User currently offlinePanAmerican From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 384 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2933 times:

FraT, yeah, sure BOS would work, however nobody confirmed they'll actually use the 757. However, even if they plan on doing that, BOS-CGN is 3119nm, BWI-CGN is3439nm, on the ATA website it says though that their 757-200s have a range of 3200nm, their 757-300 have a range of 3500nm, so they might also use the 753 to fly from BWI to CGN.

http://www.ata.com/about_ata/fleet.html#Anchor-Boein-2674

Of course, I'm still hoping for the TriStars  Big thumbs up, after all that would be a very unique and probably last opportunity to fly on one of those again!

 Smile/happy/getting dizzyPA

[Edited 2004-06-26 19:17:56]


Pan Am - The World's Most Experienced Airline.
User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1102 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2919 times:

PanAmerican,
that's why I used the word IF.

Besides that I'm still not convinced about this whole LCC transatlantic stuff. DE already mentioned CGN as well and there are a lot of fares in the market which come very close to Low Cost.
Let's wait and see.


User currently offlinePHX Flyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 541 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2819 times:

<< ... nobody confirmed they'll actually use the 757. >>

Actually, that's not true. ATA stated four months ago that they would use 757's.

The flights will be point-to-point, and will not depend on hub-feeding. Consequently, they will use large O&D markets as gateways, and they would have to take into account the somewhat limited range of the B757. Obviously, NYC comes to mind, but Boston is certainly a possibility, too.

Btw, Lufthansa served JFK-CGN with all sorts of equipment: 707, 747, DC-10, from the early 60s until 1980, I believe. Currently, they fly the route with a MD-11F.


User currently offlineWGW2707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1197 posts, RR: 35
Reply 22, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2799 times:

It would be interesting if they did fly the L1011, but I sorely doubt it.  Sad However, I did get to fly one in 1993 SFO-OGG and HNL-SFO, so I can't complain.  Big grin My first, but hopefully not my last trip in a Tristar, and my first but definitely not my last trip to Hawaii...

-WGW2707


User currently offlineWjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5087 posts, RR: 19
Reply 23, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2764 times:

My impression was that they wanted to offer connections to low-cost European carriers. Cologne offers German Wings as the low-cost carrier. If they can go into Stansted, then they get Ryanair and EzJet.

The 752 won't, I believe, make Baltimore. Also, I think that the 757-300 has a *shorter*, not longer, range than the 752, particularly with a one-class service like ATA's. Of course, ATA is adding biz class, but still...

Best,

Bill


User currently offlineDCAYOW From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 595 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2681 times:


I had seen an article in ATW or some other magazine where their Europe strategy was to link smaller / secondary European cities with US sun markets like Florida etc.

BWI would probably work - but they would need to establish a new station there.




Retorne ao céu...
25 ClipperNo1 : Doesn't ATA have a station at BWI for all the AMC flights to/from Europe? They have a german office in Kelsterbach near F R A for operational organisa
26 JBirdAV8r : An easy answer is that Delta has very little brand recognition in Indonesia.
27 ConcordeBoy : ATA would pretty much have BWI to itself as there is very little scheduled Trans Atlantic service from the facility. Four other airlines offering sche
28 Bh : Yes they do have a nice presence here in BWI with AMC,L-1011's across the pond almost every other day. The 100's and 500's and also the 757-200 to KEF
29 Big777jet : Let me ask you once more time, Does Lufthansa ever fly nonstop CGN-JFK long time ago? Do you remember or could you check timetable? I remembered LH fl
30 TravelRalf : @Big777jet I lived in Cologne and I remember the flights. You're right, LH served JFK and also Washington. As far as I recall: - in the late 60's / ea
31 7E72004 : If USAirways is in some financial trouble and happens to have to cease operations or drastically cut back, (which i hope does not happen) wouldn't PHL
32 PHLBOS : If USAirways is in some financial trouble and happens to have to cease operations or drastically cut back, (which i hope does not happen) wouldn't PHL
33 StarFlyer : If ATA want to serve O&D markets (which is an essential part of a low cost airline) they are certainly not going to fly from places like IND or PHL, s
34 7E72004 : I probably would rather go out of EWR than either JFK or LGA.
35 PHX Flyer : Indianapolis and/or Chicago will most likely be tagged on to the transatlantic flights. The one gateway I have seen mentioned most often is Boston. An
36 ERJ170 : With US LCC beginning the trans-atlantic routes, when will the airlines on the other side of the pond begin? Any clues who will be first?
37 StarFlyer : @ERJ170, apart from Condor I don't think there is any airline in Europe that has immediate plans for launching long haul low cost service. Might just
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No USA-MEX Open Skies? posted Fri Sep 6 2002 06:25:20 by HMOMX
UAL Cancellation = No USA Merger posted Sun Aug 13 2000 02:49:10 by Panamfanatic
DL At ATL : USA's Largest Tatl Gateway posted Sat Aug 26 2006 01:35:29 by WorldTraveler
No Direct Flights From Pakistan To USA posted Sat Aug 12 2006 23:23:16 by LAXDESI
ATA 757s In CGN? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 00:36:01 by Cgnnrw
Passengers?! Heck No, I Want A Good Old Freighter! posted Tue Apr 4 2006 05:54:27 by AviationAddict
No Extraordinarily Cheap Deals To The USA? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 16:32:05 by Pe@rson
ATA Creditors Want Investment Deal Halted posted Wed Nov 23 2005 10:52:41 by Indy
I Want To Go To HNL, ATA-SW Difference In Price posted Sat Nov 19 2005 05:49:42 by Elvis777
No ATA/WN Codeshare In GDS posted Wed Feb 16 2005 02:56:34 by Rjnut