Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
South American Carriers  
User currently offlineLVZXV From Gabon, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 36
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2079 times:

A few quieries...

  • Why are none of AV's aircraft Colombian-registered?

  • Why are LP's neither Chilean nor Peruvian registered?

  • Why are PZ's aircraft all Brazilian and not Paraguayan-registered?

  • Why is TA's fleet predominantly US- or Irish-registered?


  • It's strange how TAM can operate Brazilian-registerd planes within Paraguay yet AR can't within Chile and LAN can't inside Peru...

    XV




    How do you say "12 months" in Estonian?
    6 replies: All unread, jump to last
     
    User currently offlineFokker50 From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 359 posts, RR: 1
    Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2052 times:

    Why are none of Av's aircraft Colombian-registered?

    Because Av has not enought money to have those aircrafts in colombian registration, like Fokkers are registered in Holland, and McDonell Douglas and boeing in United states. This registrations are paid by the Leasing company.

    Sorry not could help in the other quieries

    [Edited 2004-06-28 03:41:33]


    Bogota, the South american gateway!
    User currently offlineArcano From Chile, joined Mar 2004, 2411 posts, RR: 23
    Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1956 times:

    XV: Hi, sorry for the late answer (estaba fuera de Santiago, tu cachai...)

    I think it's easy for LAN to register its LPs a/c with a neutral registration. I've flown some VP registred aircraft within Chile:

    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Claudio Luna



    By this practice, they can use them for all LX/LA/LE(?)/LP. But remember LA does use CC aircrafts for LP: 767s and 340 for USA routes. I think in the case of PZ, Paraguay should accept this condition for JJ to introduce the airline. I think this is more related to the special condition PZ has as a "flag airline".

    I think there will always be other "under the table" reasons for Chileans not allowing "LVs" in our domestic or Peruvians and you people "CCs" in yours  Big grin

    I think Fokker50 also has a point (Hola Daniel, bienvenido, ya habra mas tiempo de "conversar").

    Saludos



    in order: 721,146,732,763,722,343,733,320,772,319,752,321,88,83,744,332,100,738, 333, 318, 77W, 78, 773 and 380
    User currently offlineSfelix1978 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 40 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

    here is what i know.
    Avianca have their aircraft with irish and us registration because colombia is not a category one country so that means that colombian registered airlines can't operate in the us. ACES was operating their A320 with VP registration.
    LAN use their chilean registered aircraft for all their affiliates(LAN Chile, Lan Ecuador, Lan Dominicana, and Lan Peru) it goes the same way with the airbus A320 and the A340 that is operated with Lan Peru. i know that some of the A320 and 737 are VP registered.
    Taca only use US registered aircrafts because El Salvador is not a category 1 country but Costa Rica is, even though LACSA also operates with US registration. There were plans to move the hub from SAL to San Jose but I think its on hold. About the two irish registered aircraft. One of them is wet leased to CUBANA airlines, and that aircraft in detail can't operate to the US. I think it has something to do with the embargo.


    User currently offlineSumma767 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2569 posts, RR: 6
    Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1866 times:

    Colombia *is* a category 1 country.
    I am not sure about the technical issues about registering a leased plane, but it may well to do with tax regimes as well as, perhaps, offering some protection should the country fall into a lower category.


    User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6674 posts, RR: 6
    Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1848 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Taca only use US registered aircrafts because El Salvador is not a category 1 country but Costa Rica is, even though LACSA also operates with US registration. There were plans to move the hub from SAL to San Jose but I think its on hold.

    Easy there tiger!

    SAL has been a CAT 1 for a looong time, recently it went down to 2 for about 1 year due to some legal technicallities - needed some new legal regulations or something like that - Now its back to 1..

    So that is not the reason. Maybe someone else can help us..

    Im thinking it may be insurance or bank realated.. since they are US registered they must follow all US regulation = cheaper insurance. Maybe a bank credit requirement too.



    Step into my office, baby
    User currently offlineTACAA320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
    Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1842 times:

    Basically I think it´s about "costs". For example, and referred to another transportation system, many cruise ships are registered in Panama, but they belong to other countries. And the answer in this regard is simple, the Panamanian Legal System is very "friendly" about this.

    Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

    Printer friendly format

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    Abscence Of South American Carriers At London posted Mon Jul 18 2005 16:06:13 by Orion737
    South American Carriers posted Mon Jun 28 2004 03:14:25 by LVZXV
    Will We Ever See Any South American Carriers @ SFO posted Mon Sep 1 2003 03:43:32 by Copaair737
    Which South American Carriers Have You Flown With? posted Sun Oct 28 2001 15:31:39 by Singapore_Air
    South-American Regional Carriers posted Sat Dec 1 2001 15:42:18 by Flying-Tiger
    Central And South American Destinations From MIA posted Sun Oct 22 2006 10:57:51 by Pe@rson
    UA South American Routes Lucrative? posted Wed Sep 13 2006 23:31:04 by Swank300
    Why South American Airlines Don't Fly To Toronto? posted Fri Jul 21 2006 04:07:55 by MaiYYZ
    South American Airlines Update News posted Sat Apr 15 2006 20:54:13 by Cedars747
    Question About EZE Services By American Carriers posted Thu Apr 6 2006 21:37:54 by ThaiboynMexico