Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CRJ-200  
User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1863 times:

I was on a CRJ-200 for the first time this last week. It was an ASA flight from DFW to MCI, leaving at 1pm. The flight was full and for the most part great.

But just like everyone else has said, the placement of the windows really REALLY sucks. Im 5ft 11in and found myself looking at the wall next to me and not easily looking out the window.

Is this the only plane with the window so low?

Let me make it clear. I had no problem with ASA and I am not an RJ hater (I love ERJs). I just cant get over how low the window was.

Are CL60s also like this?

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRjnut From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1835 times:

i usually get an aisle seat.. i have found it is easier to look out the window from there than from the actual window seat..i just deal with the stiff neck thing. i can't not look out the window...if you do have the window seat..slouch way down in your seat...its crazy,,but i still like the plane!

User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1827 times:

I agree with your sentiments. The CRJ-200 windows are indeed, too low for a lot of us. I think Canadair made the windows higher in the longer versions of their RJ line.


Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineFrontierCPT From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 973 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1817 times:

Yes, DIA, for me, my flight on a YV CR7(United Express) from STL-DEN,I had a window seat, and the window was much easier to look out of then the CR2. But then again...I am only like, 5'7 or something....  Smokin cool

User currently offlineRjnut From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1247 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1793 times:

AS I recall, Bombardier asked several large operators of the type , early in production, if they would be interested in an updated design in regards to the window placement, and there weren't any takers...
Guess the addtional costs and waiting time wouldnt have been worth it


User currently offlineNearord From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 185 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

The original design called for the height of the cabin to be about 6'7'', and the windows were placed accodingly. It was only in later design that an engineering mistake was discovered and they had to raise the floor 5 inches. They then went to the airlines and asked if they wanted the windows moved up as well, but the costs and delays in delivery was too much for the windows to get moved up as well. So now you have a cabin in which the windows are too low for most people because the floor is suppost to be 5 inches lower.

User currently offlineAmericanAirFan From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 408 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1775 times:

I read in a regional airline magazine about how the were lowering the belly of the plane and raisng the windows.


"American 1881 Cleared For Takeoff One Seven Left"
User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6441 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

The original design called for the height of the cabin to be about 6'7'', and the windows were placed accodingly. It was only in later design that an engineering mistake was discovered and they had to raise the floor 5 inches.

That is really funny... where in the world did you pick this "story" up?



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineAmericanAirFan From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 408 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1758 times:

yup thats what it said in the magazine i read it said somethn having to do with thos mesurements.


"American 1881 Cleared For Takeoff One Seven Left"
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Oddly enough, for those of you who have been in a Challenger (any model), the windows are at the perfect height in a biz jet configuration. Any higher and you'd strain your neck looking over the sofa or in the club chairs if even moderately reclined.

I'm sure the 5" story is an interesting anecdote...but I'll believe it's only that. Through all the interrations from LearStar to Challenger...there have been plenty of times to correct this shortcoming if it were true (God, I hope!).

For airline use, the CR7 windows are greatly appreciated---but the additional headroom is nil....


User currently offlineB727fan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 316 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

Ha thats funny, I was thinking the exact same thing today! I fly the DL CRJs quite often, and ALWAYS feel like this was a plane designed by engineers who either did not care about the pax & a window, OR was especially designed for 5'-6" max. pax height! I am also 5'-11" and always find it so annoying trying look thru the windows! As far as the commuter jets go, I prefer the ERJs much better!

User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6441 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1568 times:

I read in a regional airline magazine about how the were lowering the belly of the plane and raisng the windows.

AmericanAirFan... my question was not directed towards your post but the one prior. Your post is almost 100% correct -- BBD did raise the windows on the CRJ700/900 by 5.8" which improved the field of vision by 17 degrees. However, they lowered not the "belly" of the plane but the cabin floor to improve headroom by a "whole" inch.  Big grin

...ALWAYS feel like this was a plane designed by engineers who either did not care about the pax...

FYI, the CRJ200 is a minimal change design of the Challenger 600 biz jet as it was viewed as a very high risk project at the time (everyone scoffed at Canadair's "optimistic" sales target of 200 units!!) Hence the low window height. After the success of the 200, BBD was able to design the 700/900 from scratch -- basically retaining only the fuselage cross section and cockpit profile (which is also the same on the two Global models).



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineNearord From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 185 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1552 times:

He he, I knew somebody would like that one. Sorry, I couldn't resist. I fly the machine myself for Independence, I had a captain tell me that once and just about snorted my ginger ale through my nose. Im pretty sure that all it was, was a plug, new brakes, and glass cockpit, compared to the 600 series. Am I somewhat correct on that planemaker?


User currently offlineQIguy24 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

In Cimber Air we have 3 CRJ-200's for our international routes. And I fly about 4 times a month from BSL-CPH. And I always want window seat even thoug I'm 1.97 meters. My neck always hurt like crap when I get out of the plane. But I still love that aircraft because It's very comfortable and not so noisy.

User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6441 posts, RR: 34
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

You are not too far off the mark!!!  Big thumbs up By the way, the 6'7" cabin height story is impossible -- with the 6' cabin height in the 200, the floor width is 84". To lower the floor seven inches would entail almost turning the CRJ into a 3-abreast as the resultant floor width would be approx. 12 inches narrower (the aisle is 16" wide).


Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CRJ-200 Fires posted Fri May 12 2006 17:42:26 by Sleekjet
US CRJ-200 -- Exit Row? posted Sun Feb 19 2006 03:10:37 by Columbia409
CRJ-100 Vs CRJ-200 posted Tue Feb 7 2006 02:43:06 by Tcttx
ASA CRJ 200 Overweight? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 03:02:39 by Avi8tir
What Was AC Jazz CRJ 200 Doing In MUC? posted Sun Dec 11 2005 21:50:48 by AirCanada014
Any News On The Pinnacle CRJ 200 Crash From Last Year? posted Fri Oct 21 2005 02:57:27 by Nwafflyer
Delta Connection CRJ-200 posted Wed Sep 28 2005 07:56:39 by Delta767-400
ASA To Get 12 Ex-Indy Air CRJ-200's posted Sat May 28 2005 17:18:58 by AV8AJET
NWA/Mesaba Exercises Options For 15 CRJ-200's posted Fri Apr 29 2005 22:08:09 by ATCT
CRJ-200 Landings posted Sat Mar 12 2005 03:15:48 by 747Combi