Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air India To Lease A343 And B744  
User currently offlineBOEING787 From India, joined May 2004, 158 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 6211 times:

Air India has floated global tenders to take 3 Airbus 343's and one Boeing 747-400 on lease for it's U.S. West Coast expansion.

In addition to the thrice weekly LAX via AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA they will start SFO from April 2005 with a thrice or four times weekly service.

This is a short term need until the delivery of 10 A434's and 18 B738's begin.

It definitely looks as if the 777 is out!

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 859 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 6135 times:

Correction: You mean 343 and not 434(!!??)
Didnt know that AirIndia order 10 A340-300!!
 Wow! Fantastico  Wow!

Mike//SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7110 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 6106 times:

I heard that they are expanding, and that they are short of pilots. Is that true?

User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6007 times:

Is the B747-400 mentioned the same one that they are taking from BAHC which is ex-SQ?


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6002 times:

I thought that the A343 order was never finalized and now subject to a new review by India's new government.

User currently offlineWindowSeat From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1312 posts, RR: 57
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 5957 times:



Oh Sean,

Where art thou?


cheers





I'm all in favour of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with keyboards.
User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 5876 times:

Please take notice of

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1577070/, where this was already discussed

Then, I would be interested in teh source for the claim that SFO will definitely start in Apr 2005. The time this was discussed, it was rumour, and I would be surprised if the final decision has been taken


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 5727 times:

Air India has floated global tenders to take 3 Airbus 343's and one Boeing 747-400 on lease for it's U.S. West Coast expansion.

Are you referring to the tenders that were approved by the board 3 months ago and floated in May? If so, this has been discussed many times over already.

I have also stated many times over that SFO cannot happen until a new bilateral deal between India and the US is negotiated, either to replace or modify the current 1950s deal that permits service to EITHER Los Angeles OR San Francisco. The last round of talks in May were psuedo-productive in that both sides agreed for the need to open it up some more, but neither side made any concrete proposals to do so. With the change of government that immediately followed, everything was put onto the back burner again.


User currently offlineAirbusfanYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2002, 1437 posts, RR: 25
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 5580 times:

Sean to the rescue of yet another wayward AI discussion.  Smile

Cheers,
Kaz



t.dot photography
User currently offlineHirnie From Germany, joined May 2004, 596 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4865 times:

Seems like two childs try to eveluate who did the first slash to the other and in the end we are all happy that if Air India someday gets new aircraft and can produce with a modern and new fleet...

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4657 times:

Any truth to the following article Sean concerning open skies between US and India???

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/766453.cms




User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4652 times:

Any truth to the following article Sean concerning open skies between US and India???

Absolutely. Although the article itself is very badly researched and contains a number of factual errors, the overall premise is correct. The Indian government has been pushing for a more liberal US-India deal since the early 1990s (when AI's application for Chicago service was repeatedly blocked) and it has been the US who has resisted it until recently.


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4519 times:

Whats the sticking point in the US-India bilaterals? Northwest's demands for more flights?

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4504 times:

Whats the sticking point in the US-India bilaterals? Northwest's demands for more flights?

Northwest doesn't have any restrictions on the number of flights they can operate to India. The restriction is on KLM because of the India-NL bilateral, which also prevents KLM from codesharing on NW operated flights. The US DOT has maintained that this is not a matter they have jurisdiction over, despite NW's protestations. It is an issue between India-NL and hence all US rulings are made over NW's objections. An open skies deal would not change this at all.

There really is no sticking point at present. There were plenty in the early 1990s over AI's proposed services to Chicago that were consistently objected to and finally approved only with the caveat that services via London be capped at 3x weekly (which is why we see 3x LHR and 3x FRA operations right now) - and then later over AI's codesharing to the US West Coast, but those were sorted out in the late 1990s. Right now both sides would be willing to sign a new open skies bilateral - they just need to sit down and negotiate the details.

[Edited 2004-07-06 07:40:09]

User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4490 times:

When were US - India bilaterals first drawn up?
It appears that these were crafted during the old babu socialist days when the current explosion in US-India traffic was beyond anyone's contemplation.
How do you envision the US-India bilaterals changing?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air India To Lease 4 Boeing Widebody Aircraft posted Mon Nov 13 2006 21:50:35 by B742
Air France A/C To CCS: A343 Or B744? posted Mon May 15 2006 22:52:59 by Poh2
Air India To Lease Upto Four 747-400 & 11 737-800 posted Wed Mar 1 2006 17:31:29 by LAXDESI
Air India To Lease 777-200's posted Fri Oct 22 2004 09:51:56 by Santhosh
Air-India To SEL And DAC? posted Mon Mar 7 2005 12:54:26 by MrNiji
Air Memphis Opt To Lease B738s And A320 posted Fri Sep 17 2004 00:46:03 by Horus
Air India To Receive 2 A313s In Dec 03 And Feb 04 posted Fri Jul 11 2003 18:12:57 by Singapore_Air
Swiss To Lease 2 A343 From Austrian posted Sat Oct 14 2006 03:08:19 by Daron4000
Air India Doing Al Ain And Salalah? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 18:48:02 by 777way
Air Madrid To Add 2 A343 posted Sat Jun 3 2006 01:37:09 by Solnabo