Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Misleading VS  
User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2405 times:

Note the following:


Sydney (SYD) to Hong Kong (HKG) Saturday, December 18
Select Flight/equip. Depart Arrive Notes


select &
continue
Virgin Atlantic
Flight: 201
Departs
Sydney (SYD)
December 18
4:15 pm Arrives
Hong Kong (HKG)
December 18
10:05 pm Notes
Cabin class: J7 D7 Z2 S2 Y7 B7 L7 M7 X7 N4 0 0
Distance: 4571 mi
Stops: non-stop

I thought they don't even have the approval for the route yet?

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12334 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2345 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

VS got approval last month to operate between SYD - HKG. It will be operated by an A340-600

User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

NO THEY DIDN'T!! It is still SUBJECT to APPROVAL!!!!
This has being dicussed before.

Also we noted VS annouced this Prematurely!


User currently offlineHz747300 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 1710 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2221 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Good Lord, take it easy. I am sure if Virgin prematurely announced a route without approval PM Howard will have Richard Branson shot and left for dead in the Outback.

BTW, I thought it had been announced previously in the columns too. I realize these boards are not official, but they certainly are the next best thing.



Keep on truckin'...
User currently offlineCarduelis From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2001, 1586 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2215 times:

The Thread Title says it all about most of what we hear about VS!

However, there are those who enjoy discussing such vagaries, so doubtless we'll continue to receive such messages.




Per Ardua ad Astra! ........ Honi Soit Qui Mal y Pense!
User currently offlineVSFullThrottle From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 280 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2166 times:

There is nothing misleading about this at all, VS does have all the approvals to operate LHR-HKG-SYD-HKG-LHR using the Airbus.

 Big thumbs up


User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2035 times:

They don't!
It is still SUBJECT to GOVERNMENT APPROVALS!

CX is not even annoucing their JFK-LHR flights yet!


User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17822 posts, RR: 46
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1978 times:

Either way, plenty of airlines offer routes "subject to government approval".


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12334 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1948 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Cx123

GEEEES, why don't you do some research first and then what you say will be correct Smile

VS HAVE GOT FULL PERMISSION TO FLY FROM SYD. Here is their Press Release announcing the start date of their new service. It even says that Australia are pleased that VS will be flying to Australia!!!.
Here is the press release
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/press_release.view.do?press_id=2137

The first flight starts on the 8th December 2004

All services will be operated by 306-seat Airbus A340-600 aircraft with a configuration of 45 Upper Class Suites, 28 Premium Economy and 233 Economy seats.

Details of Virgin Atlantic’s introductory promotional offers will be announced later this year, and tickets will go on sale for the new services at the same time.

Here is the link to the Sydney Airport Media Centre Press Release on the new flights
http://www.sydneyairportmedia.com/upload/Sydney_Airport_welcomes_Virgin_Atlantic_announcement.pdf

So I will repeat it again......
VS HAVE GOT FULL PERMISSION TO FLY FRM SYD Smile

Edit: to include the link to the Sydney Airport News Release

[Edited 2004-07-07 06:27:10]

User currently onlineVS4ever From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 139 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1909 times:

Is it just me or can VS NEVER do anything right in some people's mind, first it's the service, then it's the upcoming aircraft deal and now it's the "oh my god, they can't offer this service until after they have received GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL" when in fact they have and from 3 countries to start the route!"

I checked the link provided by 777ER and there is NO mention of "SUBJECT TO GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL" in it, in fact it actually praises the Australian Minister of Tourism for making it happen.

So I say best of luck to VS on this route, having been allowed it "FAIR AND SQUARE", let's hope it's the first of a few to the Oceanic region.  Big thumbs up

And to those who seem to want to knock VS for the hell of it, they have been here for 20 years, so I think they might be around for a while yet! , here's hoping anyhow.

VS4ever and ever (frustrated and annoyed, can you tell?)




Bring Back Orion Airways, you were the best!
User currently offlineSpringbokUSA From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

I am brand new as a member with a.net and have seen ALOT of Virgin bashing! My first international flight was on a Virgin 340-300 out of JNB over London to MCO and what an experience that was. They are my favorite for sure and I keep an eye out (from my front door!) for the silver 744's coming in to MCO every afternoon.



User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1886 times:

I am pretty sure it is still Subject to Government Approval! This was discussed last week in a seperate thread and we had the LINK from CX on this CLEARLY stating that VS does not have HK approval! The press release was premature!

I am NOT trying to BASH VS (in fact I really like them and think they are real innovators in product offerings) But it is just MISLEADING when posting PRESS RELEASE up without stating the conditions!


"Either way, plenty of airlines offer routes "subject to government approval".

Well those airlines do SAY it is Subject to government approval.

All I am trying to say here is that VS does not have full GOVERNMENT APPROVAL yet, and I am actually interested in how this is coming along!

i know CX have not received the approval yet. for LHR-JFK


User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12334 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1849 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

If VS did not have full permission to operate flights out of SYD then the Sydney Airport Media Centre would NOT announce the new flights also. When an Airline is annoucing a new route and they dont have full permission yet then they have to say in the press release "Subject to Government Approval". Why don't you read if you have not already the two press releases that I provided in reply 8 and you find "Subject to Government Approval" in it.

User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1807 times:

Can someone who POINTED out to me in an EARLIER POST re: the Subject to Government Approval.

I just want to know what happened to CX's LHR-JFK.

I think VS got approval for the AUS government but not HKG yet as CX still haven't received the approval for LHR-JFK


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1628 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1683 times:

VS are selling tickets now on their web-site for LHR-HKG-SYD (but only Y class on sale currently), so it seems the route is going ahead.

There was an article in the London Financial Times about a month ago concerning CX, and its plans for a bigger lounge at LHR and the extra staff it is recruiting ready for the LHR-JFK service.

CX have not yet said when this will commence though, and I do not think they have purchased the necassary slots at LHR to operate the route yet. If they want them, then they must buy them, just as VS and QF recently did.

Rich.


User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1655 times:

OK, so VS does have full apporoval for the HKG-SYD route.

Can someone who has confirmation let us know.



User currently offlineRichcandy From UK - England, joined Aug 2001, 733 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

Hi

When a route is subject to approval it brings up a remark in the CRS to say this so that you can advise the pax. I have just checked in Galileo and there is no note about that, but it does have change of aircraft at HKG.

1. VS 200 Y 10JAN LHRSYD HS1 2130 *0710 O MO< ³
³DEPARTS LHR TERMINAL 3 - ARRIVES SYD TERMINAL 1< ³
³PLANE CHANGE AT HKG< ³
³** FLIGHT DEPARTS LHR TERMINAL 3 * ARRIVES SYD INTL AIRPORT **< ³
³*** PLS ENSURE DESTINATION CONTACT TEL NOS ARE IN EVERY BKG ***<³
³OFFER CAR/HOTEL >CAL >HOA <


Amadeus does not have this so I guess the change of aircraft thing is incorret.

Rich


User currently offlinePixuk From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 322 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

"I am pretty sure it is still Subject to Government Approval! This was discussed last week in a seperate thread and we had the LINK from CX on this CLEARLY stating that VS does not have HK approval! The press release was premature!"

Cx123, probably worth remembering not to believe everything you read on a.net as gospel. Plenty of people on here like taking a shot at anything remotely connected with Branson, so just because they say something with convincing argument, it doesn't make it true. Equally, just because another airline says something about VS, that doesn't make it true either.

Branson has got his approval. Coincidentally I was at the company 'do' where he announced "we have got the piece of paper that let's us fly to Sydney" to staff 4 days before the official release.

Pix


User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1555 times:

CX123, just wondering if you have the initials.. "RD" ?


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 858 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1529 times:

Dont know why they keeping "Atlantic" now when they are going global!! Any of you guyz have another name after Virgin or do you wanna keep the name? "Virgin Ways"? Nnnaaaahhh...

Mike/SE  Big thumbs up



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

It is really strange because you can book only Y Class on the UK site for LHR-SYD.

Also I heard that they CANNOT sell HKG-SYD or SYD-HKG yet. So i am thinking maybe they are only allowed to do LHR-SYD (and not pickup pax from HKG-SYD vv) and use HKG as a refuel stop only (until they get Final HKG Approval)


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1628 posts, RR: 6
Reply 21, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

Dont know why they keeping "Atlantic" now when they are going global!!

Cathay Pacific stays Cathay Pacific, Virgin Atlantic should stay Virgin Atlantic!

why re-brand - the names great!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
787 20% Vs. A350XWB 30% posted Wed Dec 13 2006 07:13:20 by AVinutso
The VS A346 At MSY Countdown Thread posted Wed Dec 13 2006 05:39:07 by MSYtristar
A358 Vs A351x Numbers Don't Make Any Sense posted Mon Dec 11 2006 20:18:25 by Clickhappy
KE Vs OZ posted Mon Dec 11 2006 03:48:40 by ORDagent
BA, VS, 9W - BOM-LHR Convenient? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 06:15:17 by B773ER
VS + CM, Is There Something Going On? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 20:57:15 by 2travel2know
B6 Vs The Legacies In Their Own Hubs posted Fri Dec 8 2006 01:16:22 by GoBlue
Here We Go: LH Longhaul 2nd Round A350 Vs 787 posted Thu Dec 7 2006 22:01:48 by Columba
Raked Wingtips Vs. Blended Winglets posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:33:11 by Iloveboeing
VS 009 On 20th December And VS 744's PE Seat posted Wed Dec 6 2006 21:44:45 by PlaneMad