Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Analyst: AA Might Show 2Q Profit  
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33018 posts, RR: 71
Posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

Some analysts are predicting that AA might show a profit in the second quarter when results are released shortly. This is in large part thanks to thier excellent turn around plan, to cut $4 billion, that worked out quite well. Great news for AA! ope the profits become reality.


http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2004-07-13-airearns_x.htm


a.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN670UW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1605 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

From the article:
Instead, the outlook is gloomy because of... glut of available seats

I guess I don't understand how the media is still reporting that there is a glut of available seats or there is a capacity problem, when airlines are reporting record load factors. Wasn't it CO and AS that reported record June load factors, and NW that reported an all-time record load factor? I can understand low fares hurting revenues and high fuel prices raising costs, but how on earth is there still a capacity problem (which there was just following Sept. 11) when most airlines are reporting load factors between 85 and 90 percent?


User currently offlineAa777flyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1766 times:

NW670NW-

The reason the load factors are so high are because the yields are so low. It is artificially created loadfactors. Remove the millions of extra ASM,s you will see fares go up, and load factors may slightly go down. Airlines are adding capacity for competative reasons, however to fill that capacity it has to be at lower yields


User currently offlineAa717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

Airlines are adding capacity for cash flow reasons.

There is demand. There is not overcapacity. There IS the ongoing cost differential between the LCC's and Legacy carriers.

We are seeing the same demand for air travel as we did pre-9/11--in fact, we should see more because of the rebound in the economy(despite the political rhetoric downplaying this).

The LCC's are experiencing a financial letdown because of the jump in fuel prices. The Legacies are continuing to hurt because of the jump in fuel prices AND the fact that they are STILL 5-6 cents above the CASM for the LCC's while generally being forced to charge the same fares.

AA has much more cost cutting to do before they are in the clear. Tick, tick, tick... The race against time.

Their plan to generate a 30% revenue premium over the LCC's is looking suspect.TC



FL450, M.85
User currently onlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3489 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

I don't believe it, and even so, this means that in the weak Q1, AA would once again lose money. The airlines can't continue down the path of only being able to make money when load factors are 85% and the economy is finally beginning to pick up.

Jeremy


User currently offlineAtcboy73 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

I think for any airline to think they can get a 30% premium on other carriers is a joke. Maybe its because I am a non business passenger but my guess is that, much like I do, most passengers are now going for the lowest fare.

Why would someone pay more just to fly on AA. Yes they may live at one of the AA hubs and want to take advantage of the N/S, I could understand paying more for that. The only other overwhelming reason I could think of would be to take advantage of the FF plan. But then how are they going to get more money out of those frequent fliers when they are not setting the pace on fares?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA 2Q Profit: 291M posted Wed Jul 19 2006 15:31:03 by MattMSP767
UA 2Q Profit: $119MM posted Mon Jul 31 2006 15:30:02 by BigGSFO
AS 2Q Profit Triples: $55.5M posted Tue Jul 25 2006 15:32:19 by BigGSFO
United To Post Small 2Q Profit posted Mon Jul 24 2006 17:14:49 by ArtieFufkin
WN 2Q Profit: 333M posted Wed Jul 19 2006 15:58:37 by Dartland
Frontier Posts $6.9M 2Q Profit posted Fri Oct 28 2005 03:20:34 by NZblue
Half Of US Majors Make 2Q Profit posted Thu Jul 21 2005 21:37:41 by TWFirst
AA Might Reverse Belo Horizonte Suspension posted Thu Aug 19 2004 15:36:16 by MAH4546
AA Might Go Non-stop To Montevideo posted Fri Jul 23 2004 02:03:09 by MAH4546
AA Might Have To Make More Cuts, But What? posted Sat Apr 10 2004 02:26:49 by Atcboy73