Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thai And SAA The Next A380 Customers?  
User currently offlineMika10021 From Greece, joined Jul 2004, 122 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4865 times:

There was a rumour that Thai will order the A380.Any more news about that?hope they fly it to MEL.
Also last month's Airlinerworld wrote that South African Airways is considering the superjumbo.

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTasha From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4819 times:

I can see Thai, but can SAA fill a A380, except on perhaps the JNB-LHR run?

Tasha  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 962 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4816 times:

I think Thai has already committed to purchasing the A380? Maybe they are holding off until the air show. As for SAA... I havn't heard anything.

User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4782 times:

The A380 is the logical option for SAA for their LHR-routes. Its not likely that they could get new slots for expanding their flights. So their only option to grow is the A380. Today they have two daily flights by 744`s from JNB and one from CPT. And while the jumbos becoming older it wouldn't make sense to replace them with smaller 346`s. So 6 A380`s for all their LHR-routes wouldn't surprise me.

User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4740 times:

Is that make already orders with TG & SA of A380 yet?

User currently offlineERJ135 From Australia, joined Nov 2000, 680 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4627 times:

While I have no hard proof I am convinced that the Chinese will be on the order books in the not too distant future. Recently I flew China Eastern and in their in flight mag there was a short article in English on how the A380 would fit into their fleet and also the five Chinese airports that are planning to upgrade facilities to handle the A380. Given that I don't know any airline flying into a Chinese port that might use their A380s there, I wopuld have to assume that the infrastructure upgrade is to accomodate A380's within the Chinese fleets, (Probably Air China, China Eastern and maybe China Southern)


I remember when the DC-3 was new!
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4622 times:

SAA have kept the 744's specifically to operate the LHR route, because they can pack more people in than on the A346. I would say they could easily fill A380's on the JNB/CPT-LHR routes, and maintain double-daily JNB flights.

User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 851 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4568 times:

I´m hoping for BA JAL AA CO to order A388  Big thumbs up

Mike//SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7089 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4507 times:

I am hoping NZ will, but they would have no use for it unless used on LAX and LHR routes which would still be long shots. Besides LHR what would SAA use them for?

User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4484 times:

Re: Besides LHR what would SAA use them for?

Nothing - except maybe JNB-DUR at Easter and Christmas. Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 60
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4424 times:

Would ANA or JAL ever over the A380? I doubt it would happen, but I think it would make sence if they did go for the 'superjumbo'.


EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineAmerican 767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3742 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4329 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Re: Besides LHR what would SAA use them for?
Maybe AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA. AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA is also a main point in SAA's long haul system. LHR and AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA are the only two cities to which SAA would fly the A380 from their main hub JNB.

Perhaps Cargolux will be the second customer to order the A380 Freighter, first is Fed Ex. Cargolux currently has an all young 747-400F fleet, the oldest being only 10 years old, but sometimes next decade they will need to start phasing in a replacement, maybe they will continue with newer 747-400F's but if Boeing decides to close the 747 production line then maybe Cargolux will consider ordering the A380-800F.

Ben Soriano
Brussels Belgium



Ben Soriano
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 851 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4246 times:

What will JAL do when 744ER´s getting old? Go over to 773ER (too small) or buy A388 (perfect for JAL)?? That goes for ANA too IMO... Big grin

JAL/ANA have some agreement with Boeing, right??

Mike//SE  Big thumbs up



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineTrevD From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 327 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4207 times:

In JAL's case they have already decided and have gone to the 773ER. The only agreement JAL/ANA have with Boeing is the individual orders each have in place. In addition to the 773ER's for JAL, ANA has the order for the 7E7's to replace 767's as they retire and the 737NG's which will start replacing A320's in the near term.


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4191 times:

Wow Warren, what a wise analysis. "From this forum we have learnt that the plane is over weight" - do you think JAL and ANA make their decisions based on such forum talk?  Laugh out loud

And the plane is not based on projections - it will actually fly in a few months. So the B7E7 is much more a projection in comparison. At the end both types will satisfy their customers.

Btw, following your logic, all current A380 customers are dumb, right? Hm, I'm only wondering why dumb airlines like Lufthansa, Air France, Qantas, Singapore Als, Virgin Atlantic, Emirates or Qatar Airways are able to make big profits, while oh so wise airlines such as JAL and ANA have not been able to fly anyhwere else than in the red for years? Maybe your definition of dumb is somehow different?  Wink/being sarcastic


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4158 times:

Is that something about more new A380 customers for TG & SA? Is that plans for orders them with A380.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3987 times:

from this forum we already learned that it is already 12 tons over weight.

No we haven't. We've heard hearsay.

At any rate, an A380 would also be able to op nonstop to the US with little if any weight restriction, especially from CPT. SAA has always wanted to be able to carry a larger load on their route (currently to ATL), and the 380 is the way to do it.

Obviously, Heathrow is a huge driver.

N


User currently offlineAerosol From Germany, joined Oct 2000, 556 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3948 times:

So much for the weight issue:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5677884

Nice quote from another forum:
"It's funny how the most controversial aircraft of their time are the ones that are European showing the Yanks that we can beat them at their own game.

Don't act so bruised guys, I'm sure that when the 7E7 turns up it'll be really......erm.......efficient......"



User currently offlineBa319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8509 posts, RR: 55
Reply 18, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3627 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As a side note,the tourism industry to SA grows each and every year as more amd more pople visit the country.

Give it a few years an they WILL need A380's and not just to LHR.



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlineCaetravlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 908 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3420 times:

It seems like there would definitely be a place for a small number of A380s in the SAA fleet. I could also see that kind of capacity working out for several Asian carriers.

As for the article quoted by Aerosol, it really doesn't say much. It certainly doesn't say the A380 will not be overweight, it says specifically "there will be no weight problems". However, there are no facts and figures or much of anything included in that article. That could mean anything, including "the aircraft is heavier than planned, but we will still reach our efficiency targets". It could also be like Bill Clinton saying "I did not have sex with that woman", all depends on your definition of the word "weight problems", just like Clinton's definition of sex was different than most people's.  Smile



A woman drove me to drink and I didn't have the decency to thank her. - W.C. Fields
User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Reply 20, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3321 times:

@American 767/Ben Soriano:

Perhaps Cargolux will be the second customer to order the A380 Freighter, first is Fed Ex.

The A380F already has two customers: Emirates and FedEx.

Jeremiah



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineWarren747sp From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1153 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3276 times:

But SAA is already flying the A346 which is suppose to do fly to U.S. East coast non-stop both ways and it now has changed to 1 stop on many days.
On such a long flight it will be the same issue with the A380 having advertised non-stop heavily all year around and then we can blame on the winds again.



747SP
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 851 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3230 times:

I second that, Udo  Big thumbs up

Mike//SE



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 23, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3168 times:

But SAA is already flying the A346 which is suppose to do fly to U.S. East coast non-stop both ways and it now has changed to 1 stop on many days.


To accomodate cargo. They'd rather carry all the cargo and go one-stop 100% of the time than have to offload cargo based on the wind. The nonstop flights were strictly trial run, and nobody but you really expected they'd go nonstop year round.

On such a long flight it will be the same issue with the A380 having advertised non-stop heavily all year around and then we can blame on the winds again.

What makes you say that? Do you have facts and figures? No? Good, nobody else does either.

The A380-800 has a significantly higher range than the A340-600. There's little reason to doubt it at this point, until we see it fly.

N


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17003 posts, RR: 67
Reply 24, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3020 times:

American 767, I think cargolux is more interested in palletized cargo than package freight. The 744F has one great advantage there: the big cargo door. If nothing else, it allows you to carry oversize loads.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
25 Post contains images Kl911 : I'm probably dreaming again, but how about the 380 for KLM and AF for their routes to their colonies and ex-colonies? KL and AF are always totally ove
26 Teahan : @KL911. Well AF already has A380s on order. J.
27 Kl911 : Teahan, oops, I totally forgot that........... It's getting late here......... Anyway, let's hope KL orders them too, then they can work together for
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
And The Next A380 Customer Is... posted Sun Feb 20 2005 08:14:42 by PM
A380 To Visit Iqaluit In The Next Few Days posted Fri Feb 3 2006 18:43:57 by Crank
Potential A350 And A380 Customers In North America posted Sat Nov 12 2005 09:58:09 by Columba
After A380 Ceremony...What's The Next Step? posted Wed Jan 19 2005 14:55:47 by MEA321
Boarding And Exiting The A380 posted Sat Sep 25 2004 18:11:03 by Gearup
And The Next Emirates Destination Will Be.....! posted Mon Aug 9 2004 10:25:16 by FlyingKangaroo
And The Next Jet2 Destination Will Be....... posted Tue Jun 15 2004 20:19:13 by Capital146
The Definitive A380 Thread: Who, When, And Where? posted Thu May 27 2004 22:36:01 by PanAm330
SAA And DL -- The 777 Deal posted Mon Mar 11 2002 07:28:05 by Gnomon
New A380 Customers With The B747X Out posted Tue Apr 24 2001 13:36:42 by Megatop