Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Tran And BWI  
User currently offlineCumulonimbus From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 1 month 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2408 times:


While I am still on the topic of BWI, How is AirTran doing There? Do they have Plans for even more Expansion at BWI? Just Curious because I feel that AirTran and WN have done alot for my local airport.

Thanx

Mike

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2389 times:

A good bit of FL's growth in the next few years will probably be out of BWI, as ATL is nearing max capacity unless AirTran tweaks their ATL ops. I can definitely see BWI getting LAS, LAX, and SFO flights some time next year, and quite possibly service to the new cities FL has planned in the next year or so. If Southwest does scale back their BWI ops in favor of PHL, look to see AirTran up service on those routes that WN transfer to PHL. The only cities FL and WN compete on currently out of BWI are the following:

BWI-MCO
BWI-FLL
BWI-TPA

You can also argue BWI-BOS on FL competes with BWI-MHT and BWI-PVD on WN.

Even if WN doesn't scale back @ BWI, I could see FL entering on these routes that WN currently fly:

BWI-MDW
BWI-RDU
BWI-BUF
BWI-MCI
BWI-MSY
BWI-LAS
BWI-LAX

AirTran's not trying to start a battle against Southwest, as nobody's been able to win a battle against them. But Southwest does look like things may not be going their way like they're used to. On some routes, they could be vulnerable, especially if someone like AirTran or JetBlue starts on the route. Southwest may have to tweak their business model to stay relevant in today's LCC market.


User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2285 times:

I was on a layover in BWI last week, and while my crew was waiting on the crew van in front of the AirTran ticket counters, I noticed that the America West ticket counter had been vacated (the large counter adjacent to AirTran's). I asked one of our agents where they had gone. He stated that we were taking that entire ticket counter, basically doubling the size of ticket counter space we have there. Hmmmmmmm.

Travis


User currently offlineJeffrey1970 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 1336 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

I wonder how they are doing on there flights to the Bahamas from BWI.


God bless through Jesus, Jeff
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2199 times:

Wow...Travis, the last time I was BWI (flying FL to ROC in mid-May), America West was still at that counter. I suppose they've moved to some of those acres of still-vacant former US Airways counters.

I've long thought BWI still has decent potential for AirTran to grow *around* Southwest. Srbmod, AirTran has specifially avoided competing directly with Southwest on any BWI route except those to the really dense Florida markets that support both easily. We won't be seeing AirTran run BWI-BUF or BWI-RDU, for instance. The density isn't there to support both.

Here are what I think are the most promising WN-free AirTran route possibilities from BWI:

GSO--for GSOflyer and all those who don't want to drive to RDU!  Smile
MSP--AirTran makes their living scrapping it up with Delta and AA, so they're not likely to be afraid of Big Red. Also, the DC area has had no nonstop LCC service to Minnesota since Sun Country.
MEM--FL is holding their own to ATL fine there, so the nation's 4th largest metro area should support a couple of dailies to MEM.
FNT--Wouldn't compete directly with Spirit's new DTW-DCA, and offers north metro Detroiters another option.
CAK--They're up to 11 dailies there and have a strong customer base; a couple of dailies wouldn't compete directly with WN CLE-BWI and should do fine.
LAX and SFO--The sheer density of that route should support one or two dailies on each. Also doesn't compete directly with WN BWI-OAK.
PIT--Although PIT is on Independence Air's list, PIT could probably easily support a couple of FL dailies to BWI, bracketing the DCA area to the East. The PA Turnpike is a *very* crappy road and a lot of people would welcome not having to drive it. I-68 is better but its still the mountains. :P

Avoid:
DEN. UA and F9 both have loyal FF bases there and connecting hubs, FL probably would have a tough time breaking in.
HOU--direct competition with Southwest. Maybe the market could support both; our Texans would have to give an assessment. But I'd be wary.

Jim





Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineDAYGS From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 62 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2174 times:

Anybody know how the BWI-DAY route is doing for them?

User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2090 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

WN doesn't fly nonstop OAK-BWI on a daily basis...unless something has changed. However, WN will start up OAK-PHL on 10/31.

Does anyone think Air Tran will fly to secondary west coast markets like SAN, SNA, SJC, OAK, etc. in the near future?


User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2106 times:

Actually, I see somewhat different ops for FL @ BWI.

I can see FL operating from BWI to:

MKE
MSP
BMI
CAK
PIT
GSO
PHF
LGA
FNT
MYR
EWR
SFO
LAX
LAS
DEN

and new service to:

BDL
SEA
SLC
PHX
SAN

as service is added to those cities in the not-to-distant future (IMHO).

I don't see near-future service to MEM, MCI, HOU, MSY, GPT, PNS (except maybe seasonally), or SAV, simply because BWI isn't really a competitive cut-off from having to fly down to ATL from any other city in FL's system. I also don't see service to RDU or MDW unless the market absolutely demands it, simply because of the heavy competition they'd face from WN in those markets compared to the relative rewards. Then again... MDW might be able to support 3x or 4x daily FL...

Also, I expect a little more growth out of DFW before any MAJOR expansion from BWI, but I do think BWI expansion will come soon, probably next year.



Just my two cents.



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2078 times:

I've been working the Friday morning DAY-BWI flight all month, and it's been 90+ every week.

Also Jim - you're right HP did move down the road to the vacant US space.

Travis


User currently offlineIslandboy From Bahamas, joined Dec 2003, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2005 times:

I thought FL only operated to the Bahamas from Atlanta.


Looks like the fresh wind has gone stale
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1947 times:

No, AirTran added BWI- FPO/Grand Bahama Island last year. One flight daily.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineBH From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 525 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1938 times:

As for BWI FL will be taking over the HP ticket counter. They also now have the whole baggage make-up room for their selves, which has a planned expansion in the near future. Also gate D-27 which is adjacent to our gate D-25 has been used by USairways for ever but recently their computers have been removed and our wallpaper for the podium has moved across the D-27 half of the gate so it looks as if that will be ours soon. As for the FPO flight it is strong Thurs-Mon, The Dayton route has really blossomed in the past month, ever since it has switch to 2 717's (1 was RJ until this month) it has just taken off. Who knows what FL will do from this point it is so hard to tell, they like to sneak up on the comp. and its been working for them so I think any major moves will be kept hush until the last minute.

User currently offlineBNE From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 3183 posts, RR: 12
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1935 times:

Elwood64151 Where is Airtran going to find all those extra planes to fly all those new routes of yours. There is no point in Airtran trying to compete against Southwest. So don't see them starting new routes that compete directly with Southwest.

LAX and SFO, yes because of the amount of traffic, Airtran also have the option of business class and XM radio, should keep the passengers occupied on those 5 hour plus flights. Can' do any of these flights until more 737s come online.

MSP and DEN don't think it would be worth the hassle. Too much competition from UA & F9 out of DEN and NW is likely to retaliate on another route.

FNT-BWI for my mind too small 19 passengers a day 2002
CAK-BWI for my mind too small. 25 passengers a day 2002

MEM-BWI probably has the numbers for Airtran service. from 2002 there were 133 passengers per day, takes some market away from NW without going for MSP which they would defend.

GSO-BWI probably has the numbers and doesn't compete with WN.

PIT-BWI that road would have to be pretty bad for people not to drive instead of fly. They could use this route to test to see if they get a better reception from Pittsburg flyers. If the flight is successful then they could look again at PIT-PHL.














Why fly non stop when you can connect
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1849 times:

FNT-BWI for my mind too small 19 passengers a day 2002
CAK-BWI for my mind too small. 25 passengers a day 2002


Those routes currently have no LCC competition, so the fares are probably excessively high. That's why the numbers are so small. LoneStarMike has shown us lots of similar numbers on routes that were tiny before Southwest entered and pumped them up to hundreds per day. AirTran has done the same on many routes; ROC-BWI probably wasn't even 100 with three daily US DH8's before FL entered.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Tran (and Delta) Cheap Shots posted Thu Mar 2 2006 22:38:30 by Boeing757/767
Air Tran And The A320 posted Fri Feb 6 2004 20:20:19 by KBUF737
Air Tran And Their Aircraft posted Tue Jan 1 2002 06:20:44 by 767-332ER
Air Canada And Air Tran At SFO posted Fri Aug 4 2006 18:58:02 by Mnik101
Air Tran's A320 And Business Class posted Tue Apr 6 2004 22:37:18 by Carfield
Air Tran Gate Push And Ground Crew? posted Tue Aug 26 2003 03:53:38 by BOSugaDL
Air Canada, And American Cities posted Sun Dec 3 2006 05:35:05 by GoBlue
Air Canada And Its Investments posted Wed Nov 29 2006 21:27:16 by Goblue
Air Tran 717 Routes To Chicago posted Fri Nov 17 2006 08:37:36 by TrijetsRMissed
Air France And KLM Increase SJO Based Staff posted Fri Sep 15 2006 02:04:07 by LTU932