Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MAX PAX For A380  
User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2333 times:

I just read an article on the JAL123 crash in 1983. Still the most single deadliest airplane crash to date. It was a 747SP-46 and could carry over 550 people according to the article. (A prayer for all the lost souls). Was the 747 designed to carry that many pax? That is the number quoted for the A380. Is that the maximum number Boeing advertised? What is the maximum the A380 will carry on short haul?

You can view that article at http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-jal123.shtml

Please post here if you have a problem and I will recheck that address.


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2312 times:

Airbus states the A380 can hold 555 in a 3 class configuration.

FB05



Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 962 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2301 times:

I just read an article on the JAL123 crash in 1983. Still the most single deadliest airplane crash to date. It was a 747SP-46 and could carry over 550 people according to the article.

I don't believe it was a 747SP but a 747SR. The SP was a 747 shrink that increased range to pionner some city pairs we take for granted today. The SR was a full 747 with reduced range, MTOW, passenger amenities, and gallies to accomodate as many passengers as possible.. thus making it a short/medium-haul aircraft. It was replaced by the 747-400D (Domestic) that was and is popular with ANA and JAL. To fit this many people, it is basically an all-economy configuration with no business and very few first-class seats.

Only these versions (747SR and 744D) were designed to transport this many people.


User currently offlineBushcheney2004 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2304 times:

I think that I read somewhere that the A380 could hold around 800 people in a one class configuration.

[Edited 2004-07-18 00:17:38]

User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

DfwRevolution: You are very much in the know. The SR is "Short Range". Thank you.


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2236 times:

On entry into service, it will be certified for 560 passengers (this was as of Jan of this year).
Higher loads will be allowed pending further testing of the evacuation system.
Airbus decided it was better to 'pass' at 560....than to have cert issues with over 700--particularly when there is no customer for the high density config.

Fairly astute move.


User currently offlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2598 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2196 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

On entry into service, it will be certified for 560 passengers (this was as of Jan of this year).
Higher loads will be allowed pending further testing of the evacuation system.
Airbus decided it was better to 'pass' at 560....than to have cert issues with over 700--particularly when there is no customer for the high density config.

-------
That isn't what Airbus have said in the last week;

There is a long article about the A380 in this week's Flight International Farnborough Special Edition.

The main points concerning the A380's cabin interior are as follows:
• The A380 offers 35% more seats than the B747-400, but has a 50% increase in floor-space.
• The main deck of the A380 is 0.48m (19in) wider than the 744
• The upper deck of the A380 is 1.86m (73in) wider than the 744
• Economy class seats on the A380 will be 3.3cm (1.3in) wider than on the 744
• The baseline 3-class layout for the A380 is 555, but Airbus expects most cutomers to opt for less dense configurations
• One possible option is a premium economy section on the main-deck with extra-wide 25in seats at 8-abreast and 38in pitch
• The exit limit for the A380-800 will be over 800 seats - Airbus intends to run an actual evacuation trial for this number of people during the certification process, despite no current customer planning a seating density anthing approaching 800 seats

Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2469 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2027 times:

I'm sure there will eventually be Japanese domestic A380s, as there are 747s that WILL have the high-density single-class seating of 800; Airbus will just have to go through the certification process for that version, including daunting evacuation tests. If 747-400Ds carry nearly 600 now, 800 for an A380-800D should be no problem, aside from any evacuation woes. In the future, expect A380-900Ds carrying 1000 or more (can you imagine THOSE evacuation drills?  Wow! ).

User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2005 times:

Not just for this airliner, but it seems all those evacuation slides are on the port side of the plane. Are there plans for the starboard side should the port side of the plane be blocked?


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineSquirrel83 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1987 times:

It states right at the begining of the article that is was a SR not a SP

The Boeing 747SR (Short Range) is an aircraft that was designed to be used on short, high-density routes. Due to its lower fuel capacity, it is capable of carrying over 550 passengers. For Japan Airlines 747SR, JA8119, Monday August 12, 1985 began no different than any other day. The aircraft had previously flown in from Kyushu and had arrived back at Haneda, Tokyo at 5:17 p.m. The aircraft was refuelled and new flight crew boarded, while the cabin crew remained from the previous flight. The only anamoly on this flight was that the First Officer was being upgraded by a Check Captain for promotion himself to Captain. JAL123, which was the assigned flight number for this trip, taxiied away from the gate at 6:04pm with 509 passengers on board, ready for the flight to the industrial city of Osaka which was 400km away.


User currently offlineKalakaua From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1959 times:

Charters will be able to carry around 1000.


Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion.
User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Squirrel83: Thank you for the post, but, please change that color. I did note my mistake in a second post. Please read replys numbers 2 and 4. Thank you.


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Unveils Luxury Options For A380's First Pax posted Fri Jun 9 2006 17:54:28 by Leelaw
Airbus Predicts BA Customer For A380 posted Fri Nov 24 2006 15:48:15 by JAM747
UK - New "super" Wake Vortex Sep For A380 posted Mon Nov 6 2006 16:23:41 by Mptpa
Easa Eyes 15 December For A380 Type Approval posted Fri Oct 27 2006 11:40:13 by Leelaw
Break-even Outlook For A380 Now At 420...- Part 2! posted Sun Oct 22 2006 23:13:36 by Gilesdavies
Break-even Outlook For A380 Now At 420 Aircraft posted Thu Oct 19 2006 13:17:06 by Leelaw
Website That Shows Actual Pax #s For City Pairs? posted Tue Oct 17 2006 04:30:24 by TWFirst
China Southern Gets $250mil Comp. For A380 Delays posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:07:12 by N328KF
Airbus Pays Kingfisher $22 Millions For A380 Delay posted Fri Oct 6 2006 11:08:54 by Thorben
Pax Offloaded To "Applause Of Fellow Pax" For Tan posted Thu Oct 5 2006 12:57:55 by Singapore_Air