Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
EK A345 V SQ A345  
User currently offlineMika10021 From Greece, joined Jul 2004, 122 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 9 months 1 week ago) and read 4241 times:

There are a lot of talks about SIA replacing there A345's.But we haven't heard anything about the Emirates planes.Why is that?

Also what aircraft can do the ATH-MEL/SYD nonstop?

Thanx

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week ago) and read 4204 times:

Thusfar, EK has only utilized their A345s for higher payloads on B-market routes.


SQ, on the other hand, flies the longest routes in the world... using heavily payload-restricted A345s. Since the 772LR is expected to achieve significantly better performance speculations, and due to the massive size of SQ's already-operating 777 fleet; there's quite a bit of speculation that the A345's time at SQ will be as similarly short as the Celestars'.


User currently offlineSV777KiloAlpha From Saudi Arabia, joined Dec 2003, 267 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3982 times:

ConcordeBoy,

EK has been using the A345 on its DXB-SYD service for many months, and even before SQ got their A345s. I would consider the DXB-SYD route with a 14 hours flight to be a long route. Wouldn't you? Same for the DXB-JFK service.

I have tried the A345 (First Class) on a DXB-KIX service last April. The First Class Suites and the entertainment system were the best I have ever seen. SQ can't come close.

 Big grin
HZ-AKA



PPL since 2006
User currently offlineJoleb From Belgium, joined Oct 2003, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3856 times:

EK First Class all the way, its the best i ever had commercially ! SQ doesnt even have First Class on their A345. Which dumbass took that decision?

User currently offlineMotorhussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3038 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3711 times:

Joleb

The SQ dumbass, as you so eloquently put it, that chose not to include first class aboard their A345 fleet was a number of SQ marketers, engineers, planners et al that realised, after thorough investigation, that the A345, the world's current long-range title holder, would not be able to reach JFK or LAX year round while fully laden with the added weight of a first class cabin. The freight or range penalty was too high lowering the potential overall yield. They chose to focus on premium passengers with enhanced business and enhanced economy products. This appears to be working for them very well.

Regards
MH



come visit the south pacific
User currently offlineLX001 From Austria, joined Jun 2004, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3610 times:

On my opinion, SQ has got the more innovative product on it´s A345. Of course, there´s no First but the executive economy is a good and innovative product and business has more space than on the other fleet of SQ.
Emirates has still an outdated businessclass and comparing to SQ a poor economy with less room on a long flight. Please don´t misunderstand me - I really like Emirates and I´m going to fly with them this weekend, but I think that in this case SQ has done better.



[Edited 2004-07-19 15:41:42]

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3522 times:

I would consider the DXB-SYD route with a 14 hours flight to be a long route. Wouldn't you? Same for the DXB-JFK service.

Never said they weren't long... but whether you like it or not, they're still B-market routings  Laugh out loud



SQ has got the more innovative product on it´s A345

What's so innovative about a J/Y+ configuration?


User currently offlineND From Belgium, joined Feb 2004, 280 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3437 times:

ConcordBoy,

Could you please clarify the meaning of a "B-Market" route?



ND - Hated By Many, Confronted By None
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3411 times:

Really isn't a technical threshold... but for all practical purposes: routes exceeding 8000nm/18hrs, previously beyond the reach of existing aircraft.

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 915 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3410 times:

Could you please clarify the meaning of a "B-Market" route?

It's actually a Boeing terminology. When Boeing was defining the 777 in the early 90s, they saw three distinct markets for which the 777 would be tailored-

A Market- Domestic applications (5,300 miles), 350 passengers
B Market- Intercontinental applications (7,600 miles), 280 passengers
C Market- Ultra-Long Haul applications (9,000 miles), >280 passengers

When you look at this, a pattern should emerge-

A Market aircraft- 777-200A (now you know what the A means  Big grin ), 777-300A, and A330-300
B Market aircraft- 777-200ER, 777-300ER, A340-300, A340-600
C Market aircraft- 777-200LR, A340-500


User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 847 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3407 times:

If SQ wants the -LR shouldn´t there be an order out now? The roll-out is in 2 years, and SQ loves to be Numero Uno on the orderlist  Big grin

Mike//SE Big grin



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3402 times:

If SQ wants the -LR shouldn´t there be an order out now?

After their disappointment in the M11 and A343... can you blame them for patience?


User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 847 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3378 times:

Hahahahaaa.......

U do anything to get the last word inhere, C-boy, eventhough you´re wrong sometimes?

Just for the hell of it, right?

Mike//SE  Big grin  Big grin



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3365 times:

I'd be thoroughly amused, in a droll sort of way, to see you point out one "wrong" thing I've said on this thread...  Big grin

User currently offlineAntares From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 1402 posts, RR: 39
Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2469 times:

Re Dubai-Sydney being a B class route. It is in fact an A class route to London or other ports in Europe as a one-stop competitor to flights via Changi or Bangkok and it is causing an A-class pain in the A** for Qantas and Singapore Airlines.

The SQ A345 order happened because it built a jet that Boeing couldn't match AT THE PARTICULAR TIME. SQ has now received an Airbus which (drum roll.....ta dum) actually does everything SQ paid for. But it would like 'more' and the much delayed 777-200LR is almost certainly going to provide it, three years after the SQ flights to LAX and ERW non-stop started.

I doubt that the A345 will go the way of their dismal A340 Celestars, ie, to Boeing. They could keep them and use them very effectively on long range flights from Australia to the US if they get TransPac rights, or to develop other 'minor' routes. Or they could sell them as a block to someone who needs five ultra long range jets that can deal with transAntartica routes or far southern routes that are operationally forbidden territory to the 777-200LR and likely to stay that way forever.

I'll bet that the new leadership of Mr Chew at SQ is even thinking about how they might bury the hatchet with Virgin Blue and Pacific Blue and offer them the A345s for Pacific Blue flights like Perth-London, Perth-LAX, Adelaide-LAX, Sydney-Chicago, or Auckland-JFK.

Qantas will wet itself again at the thought of what these wicked Singaporeans might do to 'their' market.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2437 times:

Re Dubai-Sydney being a B class route. It is in fact an A class route to London or other ports in Europe as a one-stop competitor to flights via Changi or Bangkok and it is causing an A-class pain in the A** for Qantas and Singapore Airlines

Not class. Market. A B market route is one outside the capabilities of the 777-200A, 777-300A, or A330.

A Market - A330, 777-200A, 777-300A
B Market - A340-600, 777-300ER, 777-200ER
C Market - A340-500, 777-200LR

EK is operating their C market plane on routes that a B market plane could fly, while SQ is clearly operating far into the C market space.

N


User currently offlineCx123 From Australia, joined May 2004, 695 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 9 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

"Also what aircraft can do the ATH-MEL/SYD nonstop?"

Since when does EK fly ATH-SYD and MEL NON STOP????????????????

Is it a special thing for the olympics?


EK is OK and their F Class does look appealing, but overall SQ does have a better product (in J and exec Y Class) and also has a much stronger network to USA


User currently offlineTexAussie From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 9 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2041 times:

EK A345 is very nice... albeit no leg room in economy. First and Business very nice. The ICE system is amazing... you can call seat-to-seat for free.

It has wireless internet onboard! How do they do that? The stars on the ceiling are a nice touch. Too bad Emirates service is getting worse. The 345 crews I've been on are terribly unfriendly. The 777 crews are always great. An F/A told me the 345 crews only work that plane and the rest of the cabin crews work across the fleet.

SQ is, well, SQ. No complaints!

I have ridden all of the A & B offerings extensively (OK, not the 773ER yet) and would have to say the EK 345 is THE NICEST airplane I have ridden on to date. Coach is not comfortable, unless you have an empty seat next to you, but the rest of the plane is amazing. SO quiet!


User currently offlineEkfirstclass From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2004, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 9 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1899 times:

TexAussie
The 345 crew is not working only on that aircraft. Everybody must fly on all the aircrafts. The priority will be given though for A345 when the rosters are made. I'm a 345 crew but I didn't fly that aircraft for a month now... I'm sad to hear that you found unfriendly crew on your flights... I recommend you to talk to one of the Seniors and point any bad attitude on the spot. If you don't say anything nothing will change.
Cheers!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK A345/A346 Order posted Sat Jul 16 2005 16:08:32 by Dutchjet
2 X EK A345's At SYD Today! posted Mon Mar 14 2005 06:49:10 by The Coachman
EK A345 Diverts To Jakarta? posted Mon Feb 21 2005 08:54:47 by Sparky747
EK A345 V SQ A345 posted Mon Jul 19 2004 01:12:10 by Mika10021
Why EK A345 To LGW? posted Sun Mar 7 2004 20:21:06 by Sjoerd
EK A345 To Osaka posted Thu Mar 4 2004 07:17:36 by SV777KiloAlpha
EK A345's Operating To LGW Yet? posted Sun Dec 7 2003 10:49:13 by Planesarecool
EK And SQ Considering A380 Cancellations? posted Wed Jul 12 2006 15:24:25 by Zvezda
EK Why A345 To KIX? posted Thu Jul 6 2006 02:12:41 by EMA747
EK Statement On A345 Misleading? posted Fri May 6 2005 05:23:39 by 6thfreedom