Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UAL Close To New Financing Package  
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 2 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2140 times:

According to the WSJ this morning UAL is close to renegotiating terms of a financing package to double the cash available and extend the maturity to next summer. "The new $1 billion facility, which could be finalized as early as Thursday, wouldn't come due until June 30, 2005, said people familiar with the negotiations. The current, smaller financing package matures at the end of this year. The new facility would be backed by the same strong collateral package -- jetliners, spare engines, landing slots at airports in Washington and New York, UAL's Pacific route rights and its access to London's Heathrow Airport -- that secures the current financing."

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN777UA From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2036 times:

Good to hear....looks like the end of ch 11 is coming closer.

User currently offlineCtbarnes From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3491 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Any news about what cuts in wages may be involved? After the loan guarantees were denied by the Stabilization Board there was talk UA employees may lose their pensions. Is that still a possibility?

Charles, SJ



The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1945 times:

Isn't the most basic advice of a credit counselor/financial advisor to a debt-laden client something along the lines of "paying a credit card with another credit card is bad..."? Can we start expecting an annual UAL bailout package?


Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offline777ualsfo From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 104 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1874 times:

Great news for all the pax and employees - as well as the economies of Chicago, Denver, Washington D.C., LA, and San Francisco.

User currently offlineSpeedport From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 284 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1804 times:

I think you missed the point, this is DIP financing, or in other words while in bankruptcy financing, not emerging from bankruptcy financing.

This may be a sign that United intends to remain in bankruptcy longer than reported.

Also, this is not a new financing package. It is a renegotiation of the current DIP financing package in order to extend coverage to next summer and enlarge the original 1.5B loan by an additional 1B.


User currently offlineNWAFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1893 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1713 times:

That is not good news for the employees, that means more debt and chances are LONGER in BK.

They are mortgaging almost everything..that in its self is scary.



THANK YOU FOR FLYING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!
User currently offlineMm320cap From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 227 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1659 times:

NWAFA,

In my opinion, this is very important and good news for the employees at UAL. When we completed the ATSB process without getting a positive response, a new financing strategy needed to be implemented. This involves negotiations with the equity and traditional lending markets. These deals can take quite a bit of time. It was essential that we have the funding in place to operate smoothly while this process plays itself out. If we end up not needing it, great. But it would have been foolish not to plan for it. I also tend to agree with Tilton, who said that we should take advantage of the protections of Ch 11 as long as we need to in order to make sure we do this right the first time.

Ctbarnes,

No mention thus far about what, if any, further concessions are going to be required of the employees. Anything you hear at this point is TOTAL speculation. How do I know this? Because the negotiations have just started. Much of what occurs depends on how much financing is available from traditional lenders, and how much is required from equity investors. Then you have to see exactly what kind of equity investors you end up doing business with. I am not on the negotiating committee, so I will abstain from comment about what I think will happen. I'm sure you will see some changes to the contracts that we have in place, but to what extent, NOBODY on this planet knows yet.

Cwapilot,

Obviously we would prefer not to be putting up further collateral and borrowing more money. The ATSB decided that our problems were not generated by September 11th (obviously they missed the fact that two of those planes were ours... flew them both) and that we are not an essential part of the U.S. transportation system. However, Frontier, America West, Aloha and others must be, as they were backed by the ATSB... but I digress. I'm not sure what kind of bailout you are suggesting we got, or are trying to get, but this is certainly not the road we wanted to be on. But here we are. Just trying to do the best we can. If you want to see leveraged, look at Continental...


User currently offlineOrdpark From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 574 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1647 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Mm320cap - very well said - you have probably answered a lot of questions for a lot of people.



User currently offlineAa777flyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1586 times:

Ok, I am a little confused, does this mean that UAL will remain in CH11 until 2005 sometime? I thought their final deadline as issued by the court was late summer, and it could not be extended.....Can anyone clear this up?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
GLA Close To New Vilnius Route. posted Thu Dec 9 2004 18:22:29 by GLAGAZ
UAL/IAM May Be Close To Deal posted Thu Jan 6 2005 22:50:29 by Ual777contrail
UAL's IMC To Close, Reduce FAs posted Fri Mar 21 2003 02:03:27 by Speedport
Air Asia Close To Take Another 30 A320s posted Thu Dec 14 2006 13:29:16 by Flying-Tiger
Etops 330 Close To Approval? posted Thu Dec 7 2006 20:09:10 by PolymerPlane
New Dash 8s From YYZ To New Zealand-What Route? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 15:52:33 by DC10sRULE
Air Malta Aligning Close To Star Alliance posted Tue Nov 28 2006 07:09:56 by Jimyvr
PIA Close To RIP? posted Mon Nov 20 2006 12:58:25 by Oly720man
FAT 757 Fly Too Close To TG Plane: Hit Turbulence posted Thu Nov 16 2006 06:56:37 by Jimyvr
Air China Close To Signing For 10 B777's posted Mon Oct 30 2006 13:54:13 by UA777300ER