Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
THAI's $ 9.6 Billion Order Confirmed  
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4784 posts, RR: 43
Posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 9308 times:

According to ATWONLINE...THAI AIRWAYS has confirmed a massive US $ 9.6 billion order for AIRBUS and BOEING planes.

Thai has confirmed the following :

6 Boeing 777-200s (non ER...A series)
6 Airbus A 380s
1 Airbus A 340-500 (3 more on order)
1 Airbus A 340-600 (5 more on order)

http://www.atwonline.com/indexfull.cfm?newsid=4407

and

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2004/7/30/business/8551268&sec=business

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBartiniMan From Australia, joined Jul 2001, 315 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 9001 times:

Going by what I currently earn per hour (i am a student so i earn crap all), it would take me:
691,144,708 hours or
28,797,696 days or
553,801 weeks or
78,897 years.
working round-the-clock to be able to order something like that.

I think im gonna cry... Crying

BartiniMan


User currently offline707lvr From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 585 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 8956 times:

This seems like quite a sum of money for 14 aircraft.

User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10733 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 8809 times:

Thai´s strategy is clear:
A380s, 744s and A340s for longhaul, 777s for high-density regional routes.
No surpise.

Well, a little one: that the the 777s are A-models. I thought this first version of the 777 was virtually out of production. No one has ordered it in the last 2 or 3 years as much as I know.


User currently offlineSabenapilot From Belgium, joined Feb 2000, 2714 posts, RR: 46
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks ago) and read 8632 times:

Whow,

that's another A380 customer this year then, although this one was expected at Farnborough, but hey, we got Ethihad in stead which wasn't too bad, was it?

And another A340-500 sold too, though be it a follow up order.

Strange to see them order the older B777 versions... Anybody knwo why? Seems all those ER, LR, IGW or whatever collection of letters Boeing adds to their latest babies are not the only one's they still produce then.
(I wish Boeing stopped using all those silly letters, it even starts to infect Airbus  Sad )


User currently offlineWindshear From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 2330 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 8544 times:

I am glad Sabena, that your high emotions didn't go to your head this time, BUT and you know there always is one..."we got"...We?

Who is we?

I don't like to see Airbus and Boeing as us and them, and I think it's time that these forums didn't either...

Boaz...

[Edited 2004-07-30 12:47:01]


"If you believe breaking is possible, believe in fixing also"-Rebbe Nachman
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 8472 times:

I am glad Sabena, that your high emotions didn't go to your head this time, BUT and you know there always is one..."we got"...We?

Who is we?


Its just like watching the conclusion of a MLB Baseball game....for example:

(Fan1): We won! We won!! YAY!!

(Fan2): Yeah, I know...but 'we' didnt win... THEY won, we just watched them win so we didn't win anything.

(Fan1): *looking confused...*


Sheesh! Reality hurts sometimes doens't it?! LOL

As for the topic...$9 billion does sound like too much money for 14 planes. I can think of other uses for $9 billion such as paying off aircraft leases, etc...


[Edited 2004-07-30 13:01:31]


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineRCS763AV From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4395 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 7987 times:

Nice for the A380 line!!!!!!


Les escribo desde el frío de mi verde altiplano.
User currently offlineBongo From Colombia, joined Oct 2003, 1863 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 7627 times:

How many firm orders has Airbus for the A380 in total today ?


MDE: First airport in the Americas visited by the A380!
User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10733 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7563 times:

6 Boeing 777-200s = ca. 1 Billion $
6 Airbus A 380s = ca. 1,5 Billion $
1 Airbus A 340-500 and 1 Airbus A 340-600 = max. ca. 400 Million $

This deal is about ca. 2 Billion US-Dollars + extras, certainly not the massive 9,6 Billion $.


User currently offlineCol From Malaysia, joined Nov 2003, 2116 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7267 times:

Deal is $2.3B or 96.4 B Baht (Thai Currency).

I think they will need more 380's going forward, six may not be enough in a couple of years.


User currently offlineKL808 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7167 times:

The reason for the 777 A version is because they dont need the extra weight of the ER versions.

Its been well known that TG had problems with ETOPS. They are not very pleased with the 777's on long haul routes, therefore they confine them within its limits, or to routes without a longer diversion than 1xx minutes. (not sure what they have).

drew



AMS-LAX-MNL
User currently offlineSjoerd From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 361 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5618 times:

Why don't they order more A333's for regional routes ?


Flanders + Wallonnia + Brussels = the UNITED STATES of BELGIUM
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5535 times:

I thought this first version of the 777 was virtually out of production. No one has ordered it in the last 2 or 3 years as much as I know.

Seems all those ER, LR, IGW or whatever collection of letters Boeing adds to their latest babies are not the only one's they still produce then.


Doesnt matter.

All 777s are made on the same line, and thus can be immediately produced whenever necessary.




I wish Boeing stopped using all those silly letters

Those "silly letters" differentiate aircraft based on their commission to serve the three market segments within which the 777 competes (and dominates)


User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4784 posts, RR: 43
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3997 times:

It would be wiser for TG to order a mixed bunch of B 772IGWs and As because the IGWs can come in handy in peak seasons for extra NONSTOP flights for long haul destinations in EU-Australia etc.

If TG want to become like CX-SQ in the Far East then they have to upgrade their inflight product in all their widebodies (except AB6s-MD11s) by including the following features :

1. TVs in every seat in every aircraft (A333/345/346-B772/773/744)

2. Sleeper business class seats or at least 160 degree recline for A333/B777s. Sleepers are however needed for B 744s/A345s/A346s operated flights. Seat pitch in J class has to be increased from a hopeless 48 inches to at least 60 minimum.

3. First Class seat pitch should be increased or this cabin should be scrapped altogether and TG should concentrate on having a 5 star J class product alongwith the lines of VS-BA-CX-SQ-EK (A345only) etc.


User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12466 posts, RR: 37
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3922 times:

I agree, Behramjee, but I think there's a more fundamental reason for getting a longer haul aircraft. When the 772's time comes and they come up for replacement, who's going to want A models? Indeed, at that time, with 7E7-9s, the ERs and IGWs will be hard enough to dump, but now TG is going to have twelve of these - twelve aircraft doing a job that 330s could do a damn sight better. 777s should be on long haul routes, not short and in a proper configuration, they'll have the same pax numbers (roughly) as the 330. A bad decision, I think.

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4784 posts, RR: 43
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3843 times:

Well like Kuwait Airways who upgraded their B 772IGW engine capability to ER standards...THAI should do the same with some of their "A" series B 772s.

By upgrading their B 772s to ER standards TG too will increase the resale value of their B 777s when they would want to sell/lease them out to other airlines.


User currently offlineRoyalOrchid773 From Thailand, joined Apr 2001, 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

Can B777 A Model fly nonstop from Bangkok to Australia?

According to the local newspaper, THAI said it would buy 6-7 medium-size aircraft, long-haul (which I think they are 777s) to operate the Australian route? So I was wondering, why would TG want to order more 777A instead of the ER version?

Thanks


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7582 posts, RR: 42
Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

Does anyone know which route or routes (existing or new) will the A345's (the one ordered and the other ones on option) be used for?


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3529 times:

Seems all those ER, LR, IGW or whatever collection of letters Boeing adds to their latest babies are not the only one's they still produce then.
(I wish Boeing stopped using all those silly letters, it even starts to infect Airbus

Those "silly letters" actually have a purpose, and that is to distinguish models where adding another series number is not necessary. Airbus has done very few model upgrades where "silly letters" would be necessary. At least Boeing's "silly letters" make sense, compared to the A340-300X.  Insane

Thai has said that they would like to begin service to the East Coast, would the 345 work?

-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineKl808 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3499 times:

Reasons for ordering the 777 A version.

1) Due to TG's unreliable/BAD experience with ETOPS they opted for the A version and stick with quads for longer over water mission or himalayas etc...

2.) The 777A version will do its routes within asia where ETOPS would be minimal.

3.) The 777A versions are much Lighter than its ER versions therefore saving Money on landing fees. (And I think this is the Biggest Factor).

drew



AMS-LAX-MNL
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3488 times:

Well like Kuwait Airways who upgraded their B 772IGW engine capability to ER standards...

Um dude, 772IGW and 772ER are the same thing  Laugh out loud

Anyways, all KU did was PIP their GE90s to produce 4000lbs more thrust, and recertified their MTOW.




By upgrading their B 772s to ER standards

There is no way to upgrade a 772A to a 772ER without literally rebuilding the aircraft.




Can B777 A Model fly nonstop from Bangkok to Australia?

Easily.




So I was wondering, why would TG want to order more 777A instead of the ER version?

Because unless you plan on transporting an enormous amount of cargo, an ExtendedRange 777 would be a costly deadweight on such short route dedication.




Thai has said that they would like to begin service to the East Coast, would the 345 work?

TG has considered SFO, LAX, ORD, and NYC nonstop; the most likely candidates being San Francisco and New York. The A345 can do any and all of the above, nonstop from Bangkok


User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4784 posts, RR: 43
Reply 22, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3447 times:

TG has already announced that the new routes for the A 340s are SVO + JFK and ORD nonstop from BKK!!!

JFK and ORD obviously will see A 345 equipment being used whereas SVO god knows...MD 11s???


User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3352 times:

@Behramjee:

what you describe are their near-term plans for their deliveries in 2005. NYC was mentioned 6x and the second destination 3x weekly. But I am not sure if it really ORD, maybe it was SFO or LAX.

But the question is what additionally might come. I hope that they also use some of their next year coming 346 for an daily SFO and the new ordered forth 345 complement ORD for daily.



User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3199 times:

So does this mean bye bye for the A300's?

Behramjee, did you say non-stop ORD-BKK? Thta's great news!!!



Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7582 posts, RR: 42
Reply 25, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3016 times:

Can anyone say if Latin American destinations are still in the cards for TG?


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Wins $2.6 Billion Order From AirAsia For 40 posted Wed Jul 19 2006 18:24:30 by NYC777
Cathay Pacific 773ER Order Confirmed Today posted Thu Dec 15 2005 23:03:40 by DIA
$10 Billion Order For SQ? posted Thu Dec 8 2005 15:02:06 by TinkerBelle
Air Asia 40 Plane A320 Order Confirmed posted Wed Dec 15 2004 12:58:55 by Sjoerd
Airbus 330 Order Confirmed By Egypt Air posted Mon Feb 10 2003 16:06:26 by Fly707
US$ 3.60 Billion Order From CI. posted Tue Dec 24 2002 11:18:28 by Hkgspotter1
EasyJet Discusses $6 Billion Order With Boeing, Ai posted Wed Jun 26 2002 15:53:26 by Flying-Tiger
SAA Airbus Order Confirmed posted Wed Jun 19 2002 13:42:29 by Flying-Tiger
Emirates $6.6 Billion Order For 25 777s posted Thu Mar 21 2002 12:22:46 by GF-A330
Thai Airways Re-Consider A380 Order posted Mon Oct 2 2006 02:26:32 by PanAm_DC10
Airbus Wins $2.6 Billion Order From AirAsia For 40 posted Wed Jul 19 2006 18:24:30 by NYC777
Cathay Pacific 773ER Order Confirmed Today posted Thu Dec 15 2005 23:03:40 by DIA
$10 Billion Order For SQ? posted Thu Dec 8 2005 15:02:06 by TinkerBelle