LifelinerOne From Netherlands, joined Nov 2003, 1958 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 8292 times:
I think it's unbelieveble that such a known carrier as Air China gets involved into something as bad maintenance. China is going to be one of the biggest marktes in the world for leisure and business and if people see this, they wil not chose for Air China...
Just my 2 cents from a bl**dy hot Holland... (the weather is always wrong )
N276AASTT From US Virgin Islands, joined Jan 2004, 620 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 8249 times:
That is truely sad. It's sad that the income of revenue is far more important than people's lives. If I were a passenger and found out that my life had been put in jeopardy like that, all hell would've broken out in China.
Stretch 8 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2568 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 8225 times:
I recently watched the Discovery channel's program about the crash of AA Flight #191, the DC-10 that went down at ORD in May 1979.
In a re-eenactment of the TO run, passengers look out the windows to see the No.1 engine busting up and off the wing. Now there is something you don't want to see, especially if you are on the aircraft
Maggs swings, it's a drive deep to left! The Tigers are going to the World Series!!!
COAMiG29 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 515 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 8060 times:
The fact that it flew is amazing but the airline/cargo service obviously flys the planes till they crash and burn. I have also heard that CAAC the Chinese airline removes the instruments from the cockpits as they do not believe in electronics. Do a photo search on flight decks on caac.
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
Francoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 4097 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 7982 times:
Miamiair: Thank you.
The engine was victim of a FOD, so it was removed from the A/C.
Maybe it was strapped to prevent it from windmilling in order to make a ferry flight on 3 engines, but I refuse to believe any crewmember would, in his sane mind, take off on a revenue flight with only 3 engines. This could simply lead to grounding the whole frickin' airline if the authorities realized.
It is easy to get some pictures of a fodded engine that was strapped for a ferry flight and use it to destroy an Airline or a country's reputation. Plus this is hardly a reliable source, which takes advantage of the fact that there are so many gullible people on the net to make sensationalistic news.
And apparently it works.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
Spacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3905 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 7865 times:
I agree with those who say it sounds bogus - as soon as I read it I was practically heading for snopes.com to see if it's shown up there. (I don't see it, but it might be there somewhere; might not have propogated enough yet though.)
I would think more likely than making a three-engine ferry flight, though, this engine was probably ferried as a fifth engine, which 747's are capable of carrying. You really can't tell much from these pictures, though.
I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
StearmanNut From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 352 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 7807 times:
Big problems in replacing big engines in a foreign country. I remember an AN- 124 that sat down at DFW a few years back and had to get a replacement engine flown in from the Ukraine.
Main problem was that Customs would not pass the new engine into the US unless a huge import tariff was paid on it. The other problem was that the maintenance facility had to obtain funds in cash up front from the AN's owners before they would allow the faclities and labor to be used to install the new engine.
If wishes were horses, a Tail Dragger I would fly...
FoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3048 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 7691 times:
I have some serious doubts about this one. First of all, people love to bash Chinese airlines, but although there was good reason back in the 80s, these days Air China is a reputable airline that I am quite certain would not let a revenue flight take off with an inoperative engine. Furthermore, I don't recall hearing anything about this incident in recent memory, and I am fairly sure that something this scandalous would have been pretty big news in the aviation community. Finally, those photographs mean nothing--the engine is just sitting in a hangar next to what appears to be an Air China aircraft. It is not even installed.
I have no idea what the real story behind the photos might be. Maybe it really happened as described, but 20 years ago. Or, more likely, maybe it's just a photo that is totally out of context. I'm sure the truth is out there somewhere...
ASTROJET707 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 299 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7514 times:
screaming, crying, infants, out-of-control toddlers and CELLPHONES.
The last thing I want is to be on a transcon with passengers yapping their way from one coast to the next. I enjoy the quiet, it is a break from a hectic schedule.
: OMG!!!!!! The cryptkeeper Jackson.......quick, give me a parachute!! Micke
: Stirling, Interesting series of shots involving an NW ARJ and a jetway. Where did that happen? It looks like MSP. Here's the link if anyone is curious
: That ARJ incident happened a couple years ago to ship 528. It was big news then, but then it faded away. That was one of their newest ARJs as well.
: "That is clearly not an Air China plane. Air China has grey engine cowlings, and this plane has blue ones" I'm sorry but I beg to differ. Whilst I agr
: Look at the angle of the wings doesn't look as a 747 but more as a AN124 or IL-76 so I would either conclude that this was a Cargo flight! I don't bel
: Hi all, Neither of the engines in the first picture are attached to an aircraft so they may not even be from the aircraft shown in the background. If
: it looks like that wing belongs to a neighboring aircraft, not in the picture. as is a common configuration for parking more than one airplane in a ha
: I lend no credibility to this story, this is a ridiculous story. I don't have more words on that. To say more about the credibility of this site: http
: Dudes...worse things have been done by flight crews...*cough*Aero*cough*flot*cough*...damn this cold. But hey...Michael, aka Latoya, Jackson might be