Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Swiss A340 To Cairo - For How Long?  
User currently offlineOliver From Switzerland, joined Oct 1999, 144 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3993 times:

I've recently checked the bookings for the Swiss flight from Zurich to Cairo. It's operated by a A340 5 x weekly and it's really poorly booked, especially in Business and First. Even the A330-200 seems to be way too big and heavy for that route. They'd better operate an A320 to Cairo to make at least a bit of money. I know it won't be confortable for Business Pax. I wonder when they'll change the aircraft type to Cairo. Daily there are many Swiss LH routes overbooked, like Bangkok and Hong Kong. When will they finally start to shift capacity to more profitable sectors? Or how long will it take until we see a new LH route added to the Swiss network? And don't tell me the airline has no money for such negotiations in the current situation...They replaced a whole, reliable and intact MD11 fleet by brand new A340's.

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3947 times:

It's showing it as an A340-300 indefinitely.

Regards

[Edited 2004-08-15 00:57:02]


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineWhitehatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3935 times:

The flight could be one that has been squeezed into the existing A340 diagrams. Rather than have it on the ground for six hours, it does a quick return trip to Cairo.

Qantas regularly do a set of charters out of LHR for cruise passengers along similar lines. The aircraft would otherwise be on a remote, earning nothing at all. It's not a case of misuse of an aircraft, more one of using an aircraft that would otherwise be sat idle for a short time which is insufficient to factor into a longhaul timetable slot.


User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3923 times:

Oliver, the route is very high yeilding for Swiss. Loadfactor might not be as high, but the the fares on the route tend to be very high. Also in May Egyptair quit the route due to the success of Swiss (deciding to concentrate on Geneva) so Swiss has a complete monopoly on the route. Also besides the Swiss tourists flying the route, many Egyptians use Swiss to make onward connections to North America.

The route was intially flown by MD-11, then after 9/11 they used the A332. At the start of the winter 2002 season the MD-11 made a come back till March this year when the A343 came into service on the route.

Also the reason loadfactors are lower at the moment is simply because Egypt/Cairo is a winter destination, so summer is the 'off peak' season.

LX236 departing for CAI

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Christian Galliker



LX237 arriving from CAI

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Propfreak



Horus




EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 3778 times:

CAI switched to 343 when there has only been one or two M11 left in the Swiss fleet. The only plane left at the moment (HB-IWE) does a daily ZRH-ORD vv. schedule and there is no space for flights to CAI anymore.


Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineLX23 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 347 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 3766 times:

If you check, swiss also does this quite often to TLV...and used to do it daily to LHR right up until about the time that they "joined" oneworld.
which more or less brings a semi-related question...on a few occasions, I saw either 2 A332s or an MD11/A332 combination (as in 2 long-hauls at the same time) in GVA...anybody know why that happened? I thought they switched off in JFK...


User currently offlineChrisZRH From Switzerland, joined May 2004, 423 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3668 times:

well Swiss operates twice daily to TLV (plus codeshare with ELAL). they onward USA traffic is pretty good on that route! A340 is daily to TLV plus the A320. Swiss still operates GVA-JFK, i think even daily or 6 times weekly with A332


Christian Galliker - AirTeamImages
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3580 times:

CAI switched to 343 when there has only been one or two M11 left in the Swiss fleet

Flight International reported that they had 3 MD-11s in March 2004, which was when they began using the A343 to CAI.

Horus




EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineUnique From Switzerland, joined Mar 2003, 1703 posts, RR: 36
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Even the A330-200 seems to be way too big and heavy for that route. They'd better operate an A320 to Cairo to make at least a bit of money.

I wonder what your source is? How can you tell that LX doesn't make money? Have you ever thought of well paying cargo traffic? An A320 on that route might not be able to carry the sufficient amount of cargo the market is requiring but the A330 is!

Further to that, an A330 coming in from a long haul flight at 6.30am and leave for CAI at 9.50am is better utilized than an A320 which arrived at ZRH from an european city at 22.30pm the day before! There is not sufficient time to do a flight leaving ZRH to say CDG at 7.25am and return on time to operate the flight to CAI.

Even LX sometimes does things which make sense...!


User currently offlineDeltaMIA From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1672 posts, RR: 17
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3532 times:

I just got back from CAI on LX and both of my flights were full in Business and Coach. I know that doesn't necessarily mean they are making money, but it does show they can fill the 343 between CAI and ZRH and based on what others say it is a high-yielding route. Additionally the return into CAI doesn't even meet all of their destinations. The aircraft continued onto to HKG after arriving CAI.


It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.
User currently offlineLX23 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 347 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3501 times:

@Chris:
thanks, I know they're operating the daily GVA-JFK (which, rumour has it they plan to drop along with GVA)...what I meant to say was that I have, on occasion, seen 2 Longhaul airplanes in GVA at the same time (and no, I don't mean when the A340 came on it's demo flight Big grin). I know that sometimes, they "switch" the airplanes in JFK (I'm guessing for maintenance?).
Here's an example:
HB-IQI today does ZRH-JFK
HB-IQC does GVA-JFK
Tomorrow, we see
HB-IQI doing JFK-GVA
HB-IQC doing JFK ZRH

Since this is how the switch is normally done, I was wondering why there have been times where we have had 2 long-haul airplanes here in GVA


User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3460 times:

Horus
If not mistaken, one M11 was leaving the fleet soon after that. Or it was already standing in white colors at ZRH.



Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 59
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3378 times:

Swissgabe, to be honest I am not sure of the details, just reporting what FI said.

Unique, in addition to you excellent analysis, an A320 would offer an 'inferior' service compared to the A340, due to the smaller cabin and less comfortable F, C any Y seats.

DeltaMIA, hope you had a great time in Egypt Big grin


Horus





EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SAS MD-87 To Spanair, For How Long? posted Fri May 19 2006 15:01:44 by 717fan
For How Long Are Prices Going To Get Higher? posted Mon Sep 5 2005 17:46:50 by SDLSimme
Austrian 777's For How Long? posted Sat Apr 15 2006 20:12:55 by TwoLz2Rn
NW DC10s: Where Do They Fly And For How Long? posted Thu Oct 20 2005 18:25:21 by Usa4624
OA's 717's, Which Routes And For How Long posted Sun Apr 10 2005 12:19:55 by Ushermittwoch
Swiss A340 To JFK? posted Tue Aug 17 2004 01:27:02 by ContinentalEWR
Airbus For Air Canada For How Long? posted Sat Jan 10 2004 07:59:57 by YOW4NOW
For How Long Is AV8Air Leasing TF-FIA? posted Wed Jan 7 2004 20:00:13 by Pe@rson
Northwest Airlines 747-200 At HKG For How Long? posted Sun Nov 16 2003 06:07:35 by Hkg82
Swiss A340 To HKG, When? posted Mon Sep 29 2003 05:23:31 by CXHKG